dynoed my 05 300hp engine whit few bolts on
Hindsight is always 20/20, but you should have dynoed bone stock first. I have heard results from a couple 300hp motors and so far they have been impressive. I have also seen thawk408's dyno sheets and how it reacted to modifications . . .again very impressive.
I think you might be better off replacing the test pipes over waiting for an ECU reflash. Then take it back to the dyno again.
I think you might be better off replacing the test pipes over waiting for an ECU reflash. Then take it back to the dyno again.
+1
yeah i did mistake i should done bone stock dyno then dyno every mod but aniway im saving for boost so for now all live whit it
thx
mike
yeah i did mistake i should done bone stock dyno then dyno every mod but aniway im saving for boost so for now all live whit it
thx
mike
Originally Posted by VandyZ
Hindsight is always 20/20, but you should have dynoed bone stock first. I have heard results from a couple 300hp motors and so far they have been impressive. I have also seen thawk408's dyno sheets and how it reacted to modifications . . .again very impressive.
I think you might be better off replacing the test pipes over waiting for an ECU reflash. Then take it back to the dyno again.
I think you might be better off replacing the test pipes over waiting for an ECU reflash. Then take it back to the dyno again.
I think that spacer is costing you power. With redesigned higher flow intake manifold for the 6MTs, adding a spacer will most likely cause tubrulence in the chamber in the upper rpms. Take that off and put the stock intake back on. I'd bet you'll see better numbers then.
Originally Posted by Dave B
I think that spacer is costing you power. With redesigned higher flow intake manifold for the 6MTs, adding a spacer will most likely cause tubrulence in the chamber in the upper rpms. Take that off and put the stock intake back on. I'd bet you'll see better numbers then.
Originally Posted by Dave B
I think that spacer is costing you power. With redesigned higher flow intake manifold for the 6MTs, adding a spacer will most likely cause tubrulence in the chamber in the upper rpms. Take that off and put the stock intake back on. I'd bet you'll see better numbers then.
Here is my dyno:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....=05+track+dyno
Give it run for a few mile and then dyno it again. The result may surprise you.
I dyno my bone stock Z when it has 1300 miles and my put down 233whp and 226tq. THen dyno it with no hp mods at 7k miles and got 256whp and 244tq. The engine just probably haven't well broken in yet.
I dyno my bone stock Z when it has 1300 miles and my put down 233whp and 226tq. THen dyno it with no hp mods at 7k miles and got 256whp and 244tq. The engine just probably haven't well broken in yet.
thats a hell stong factory engine you have! how did you break in your engine?
thx for for all input and im sorry for painfull reading
thx for for all input and im sorry for painfull reading
Originally Posted by homiusang
Give it run for a few mile and then dyno it again. The result may surprise you.
I dyno my bone stock Z when it has 1300 miles and my put down 233whp and 226tq. THen dyno it with no hp mods at 7k miles and got 256whp and 244tq. The engine just probably haven't well broken in yet.
I dyno my bone stock Z when it has 1300 miles and my put down 233whp and 226tq. THen dyno it with no hp mods at 7k miles and got 256whp and 244tq. The engine just probably haven't well broken in yet.
Originally Posted by taurran
My car dyno'd really low with my listed NA mods. The ECU reflash is the key to gaining any power whatsoever out of your NA and bolt-on mods. Don't even bother hitting the dyno without the ECU reflash unless you're prepared to be disappointed.
) because of the variations in hp machines. The only meaningful comparison is between dynos done on the same car on the same machine without mods first, then with mods.
Originally Posted by thawk408
NO. The only thing the new intake manifold is that the lower plenum has smaller and fatter runners. How in the world would a plenum spacer add extra turbulence?
Here is my dyno:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....=05+track+dyno
Here is my dyno:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....=05+track+dyno
Originally Posted by Dave B
The 05 6MT manifold is designed for higher air flow in the upper rpms while trading a bit midrange punch. To do this, intake velocity is increased by redesigning the runners (ie lower part of the manifold). By adding a spacer or plenum could possibly disrupt the intake velocity and intake pulses. Your dyno does seem to show a very marginal increase in power from 6000-7000rpms which really won't make you much quicker in the 1/4 mile (maybe .05 seconds), but it is clear you're not loosing any power.
Last edited by thawk408; Jun 4, 2005 at 04:19 PM.
This has got to rank #1 in the poorest grammar, worst spelling, incomprehensible, thread start I've seen. Christ!!!!!!!!!! Were you kidding or is this really the way you (try to) communicate?
jcpeyton,
that got too be the useless info ive seen my life plz do you a favour, go share your stupid comment in a juvinile forum thx!
heres the graph look like its way too rich on top! maybe costing me a few hp
btw i dont think the spacer is costing me some hp im guessing the engine is not well break in yet i will dyno again at 6-7k milles
mike
that got too be the useless info ive seen my life plz do you a favour, go share your stupid comment in a juvinile forum thx!
heres the graph look like its way too rich on top! maybe costing me a few hp
btw i dont think the spacer is costing me some hp im guessing the engine is not well break in yet i will dyno again at 6-7k milles
mike
Originally Posted by mikz350
jcpeyton,
that got too be the useless info ive seen my life plz do you a favour, go share your stupid comment in a juvinile forum thx!
heres the graph look like its way too rich on top! maybe costing me a few hp
btw i dont think the spacer is costing me some hp im guessing the engine is not well break in yet i will dyno again at 6-7k milles
mike
that got too be the useless info ive seen my life plz do you a favour, go share your stupid comment in a juvinile forum thx!
heres the graph look like its way too rich on top! maybe costing me a few hp
btw i dont think the spacer is costing me some hp im guessing the engine is not well break in yet i will dyno again at 6-7k milles
mike
The a/f ratios are written on the bottom of the picture, take a look:
http://community.webshots.com/photo/...21123818VBbbZi
what the ratio diff between the 2 brand dyno?
Originally Posted by Gators2001
I just dynoed yesterday on a DYNOmite, in raining 84 degree wheather here in FL.
05' Euth.
Modz: Nismo Exhaust, Crawford HF Catz, JWT POP
3 pulls in 4th = 261-268.8 HP
05' Euth.
Modz: Nismo Exhaust, Crawford HF Catz, JWT POP
3 pulls in 4th = 261-268.8 HP


