Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

check engine light?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 11:45 PM
  #21  
MarquisDeSam's Avatar
MarquisDeSam
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Just make sure everything is tight with no leaks and you should have no CEL. Helix boasts that they won't throw off CEL, but with enough exhaust flow, CEL will go off. Nothing a little OBD-manipulator can't fix.
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 05:52 AM
  #22  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by INTENSEPOWER
Alex,

Yes, from 2004.5 to present, they throw CEL from what we've seen. Unfortunately we have no current knowledge of a fix for it either. Sorryz.
This is killing me. I have been posting a $10 fix for this for MONTHS and MONTHS.

HELP! nonfoulers, part # 42002 or 42009 - either will work.
Buy two packs for a total of '4' nonfoulers. Take two of the four and drill them out with a 1/2" drill bit. Take the two NONdrilled nonfoulers and screw one into each test pipe. Then screw one drilled nonfouler into them on each bank. Now, install the o2 sensors into drilled nonfouler and you are done.

Each bank should look like this

o2 sensor -> DRILLED nonfouler -> NON drilled nonfouler -> test pipe

Make sure the code is cleared before running the car as the fix will keep the SES light away, but 'may' not clear it if it was already thrown.

Originally Posted by MarquisDeSam
Just make sure everything is tight with no leaks and you should have no CEL. Helix boasts that they won't throw off CEL, but with enough exhaust flow, CEL will go off. Nothing a little OBD-manipulator can't fix.
It isn't a matter of too much flow, it is a matter of how 'clean' the exhaust gas is. The ECU runs a check to ensure the downstream sensors are reading 'cleaner' than those upstream. If they are at the same readings, the car assumes the cats aren't working properly and you throw a code.

From my experience there are no "obd-manipulator", MIL eliminator, or o2 sims that solve this problem. The nonfoulers are the easiest, cheapest method to resolve this issue.


PM if you have questions.

Last edited by Zivman; Sep 20, 2005 at 05:57 AM.
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 02:06 PM
  #23  
INTENSEPOWER's Avatar
INTENSEPOWER
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (208)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
This is killing me. I have been posting a $10 fix for this for MONTHS and MONTHS.

HELP! nonfoulers, part # 42002 or 42009 - either will work.
Buy two packs for a total of '4' nonfoulers. Take two of the four and drill them out with a 1/2" drill bit. Take the two NONdrilled nonfoulers and screw one into each test pipe. Then screw one drilled nonfouler into them on each bank. Now, install the o2 sensors into drilled nonfouler and you are done.

Each bank should look like this

o2 sensor -> DRILLED nonfouler -> NON drilled nonfouler -> test pipe

Make sure the code is cleared before running the car as the fix will keep the SES light away, but 'may' not clear it if it was already thrown.


It isn't a matter of too much flow, it is a matter of how 'clean' the exhaust gas is. The ECU runs a check to ensure the downstream sensors are reading 'cleaner' than those upstream. If they are at the same readings, the car assumes the cats aren't working properly and you throw a code.

From my experience there are no "obd-manipulator", MIL eliminator, or o2 sims that solve this problem. The nonfoulers are the easiest, cheapest method to resolve this issue.


PM if you have questions.

Hello,

Thanks for the reply. My reply was to say that we have no current knowlege of a fix. Thanks for the post. Very informative.
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 02:12 PM
  #24  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

the non-fouler method has worked for MANY MANY people. It should be in a FAQ in the intake/exhaust section somewhere

I use it on my car and I don't even have test pipes, but have all other major NA mods. It has no downside that anyone can find other than tech inspectors might go WTF do you have spark plug extenders here for? and decide that isn't good cause you're really cheating your ECU to think emissions are fine when they're not

Last edited by sentry65; Sep 20, 2005 at 02:22 PM.
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #25  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by INTENSEPOWER
Hello,

Thanks for the reply. My reply was to say that we have no current knowlege of a fix. Thanks for the post. Very informative.
Just giving you a hard time. That info is posted in the sticky FAQ at the top of this section.
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 03:32 PM
  #26  
INTENSEPOWER's Avatar
INTENSEPOWER
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (208)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
Just giving you a hard time. That info is posted in the sticky FAQ at the top of this section.
All Good!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Uriyo_
Exterior & Interior
22
Sep 8, 2021 08:46 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
350z82
Exterior & Interior
19
Oct 1, 2015 06:25 PM
Sleeper_Z
Forced Induction
3
Sep 30, 2015 10:25 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 PM.