Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

Sport Z Magazine plenum results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #21  
Nismo 350z's Avatar
Nismo 350z
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 1
From: So.Cali 626-951
Default

Originally Posted by devster
As in JUST the lower plenum and no spacer? How do you guys think a lower 300hp plenum would do combined with a spacer or an upper plenum? Has anyone tried? Maybe I should after the new year

You reading this GSC Motorsports?
You lose HP and TQ if you combine any of those parts. You can only have either an upper plenum, a spacer, or the lower plenum. You can try a lower plenum and have a spacer if you want, but from what I heard that by doing that then its too much air for the ECU to compensate and it resets back to factory settings. I have not seen anyone here or anywhere combining plenum parts and actually benefited from it.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #22  
Diesel350's Avatar
Diesel350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,378
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by Nismo 350z
Cool. I was going to get the motordyne spacer but I got the lower plenum on my 04 and its awesome above 5K rpms. What did they say about it?
Very good gains at 2000 and 6400 rpm.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 07:12 PM
  #23  
Inovashn's Avatar
Inovashn
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
Default

what would you think about a lower plenum and upper plenum with a turbo xs utech piggyback?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #24  
glittle41585's Avatar
glittle41585
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: orange county ca
Default

im thinking about picking up a plenum should i go with the upper or lower please soembody let me know which one i should choose
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 07:29 PM
  #25  
DavesZ#3's Avatar
DavesZ#3
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,887
Likes: 23
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Mike@Altered
Ugh yeah our plenum was the first they tested and after talking with them it looks like it wasn't installed properly!
I'm curious, how can you install it wrong? The spacer only fits one way because of the shape having to match the plenum and gaskets.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 07:36 PM
  #26  
JDMFairlady21's Avatar
JDMFairlady21
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 1
From: LI, NY
Default

if i'm not mistaken the bolts have to torqued properly and also there might have been leaks..
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 09:35 PM
  #27  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

As a contestant, I attended the plenum mod shoot out and saw the dyno plots that day.

To be fair to the guys at AAM, it looked like the ECU suddenly pulled timing on that particular set.... Almost as if the knock sensor was hit by one large knock and it suddenly yanked back timing.

I don't think their mod could have caused a decrease in power anywhere in the curve unless timing was pulled. By looking at the dyno plot it was fairly obvious what happened. Timing was abruptly pulled.

Although the rest of us didn't encounter it, ping was (is) a unpredictable risk that could have happened to any one of us at the competition. Chalk it up to random luck of the draw.

The ECU reacted to the random hit of a ping.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 11:12 PM
  #28  
VeeTec's Avatar
VeeTec
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
From: Jackson County, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Hydrazine
As a contestant, I attended the plenum mod shoot out and saw the dyno plots that day.

To be fair to the guys at AAM, it looked like the ECU suddenly pulled timing on that particular set.... Almost as if the knock sensor was hit by one large knock and it suddenly yanked back timing.

I don't think their mod could have caused a decrease in power anywhere in the curve unless timing was pulled. By looking at the dyno plot it was fairly obvious what happened. Timing was abruptly pulled.

Although the rest of us didn't encounter it, ping was (is) a unpredictable risk that could have happened to any one of us at the competition. Chalk it up to random luck of the draw.

The ECU reacted to the random hit of a ping.

That makes sense.

I was running a stock dyno on a 97 Maxima SE I use to own, and the first two runs hit 168 fwhp, which is quite good for a stock 97, then on the third run the timing being advanced must have taken it's toll.

The ecu suddenly pulled timing, and the car made 149 fwhp!

If the test car leaned a little bit too much, due to better air flow, than it could have pinged.

Considering how well my car ran during it's last trip to the track, after the AAM install, and cheap gas, I have no doubt the increase is in the 10+rwhp area.

Last edited by VeeTec; Dec 19, 2005 at 11:16 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 11:18 PM
  #29  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

IMO the plenums/spacers all do roughly the same

we're talking 1-2hp/tq difference at different rpms between all the different setups

I know there's minor differences, but it still isn't the hugest big deal difference out there. I know for NA it's important though, but still it's going to be different with each car with different mods
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 11:37 PM
  #30  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default

Originally Posted by Hydrazine
As a contestant, I attended the plenum mod shoot out and saw the dyno plots that day.

To be fair to the guys at AAM, it looked like the ECU suddenly pulled timing on that particular set.... Almost as if the knock sensor was hit by one large knock and it suddenly yanked back timing.

I don't think their mod could have caused a decrease in power anywhere in the curve unless timing was pulled. By looking at the dyno plot it was fairly obvious what happened. Timing was abruptly pulled.

Although the rest of us didn't encounter it, ping was (is) a unpredictable risk that could have happened to any one of us at the competition. Chalk it up to random luck of the draw.

The ECU reacted to the random hit of a ping.
I am sure that it is something like that. No worries AAM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #31  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default

But I am really interested in how the lower plenum did. Can someone give a brief synopsis on that?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 12:57 AM
  #32  
Ed 718's Avatar
Ed 718
BRAVEHEART
Premier Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,830
Likes: 3
From: PRODUCT OF BROOKLYN 718 USA
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel350
.THey also tested the lower 300hp plenum on the 03 Z and it did pretty well.
I think that might have been my car althought I have not seen the issue yet.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 03:42 AM
  #33  
Diesel350's Avatar
Diesel350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,378
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by Ed 718
I think that might have been my car althought I have not seen the issue yet.
Yep that was your car ed.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 03:44 AM
  #34  
Diesel350's Avatar
Diesel350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,378
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by throbbing_Zon
But I am really interested in how the lower plenum did. Can someone give a brief synopsis on that?
9-10 HP increases in the 2000, 3500, 4000, 6400 RPM range. 3HP/3TQ peak gain
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 05:53 AM
  #35  
350ZRB's Avatar
350ZRB
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Default

Did they test Kinetix SSV?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 06:21 AM
  #36  
Diesel350's Avatar
Diesel350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,378
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by 350ZRB
Did they test Kinetix SSV?
No.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 08:36 AM
  #37  
DaveO's Avatar
DaveO
Sponsor
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: SoKal Desert
Default

Originally Posted by Mike@Altered
Ugh yeah our plenum was the first they tested and after talking with them it looks like it wasn't installed properly! If you check the Modified Magazine article (two issues ago) they gained 13rwhp with our plenum.

We are talking about a follow-up article and re-dyno of the AAM to get the correct results.

Mike,

Please note that I personally believe you have a good product and our test results were not typical for the AAM Spacer and I said so in my article. However, my test observations and memory of our conservation certainly differ from yours. During our conversation you mentioned that we may not have installed it correctly. I said I didn't think so, but would look into it. I did.

We installed the AAM Spacer according to the supplied AAM instructions, including step 13. Tighten all bolts to 4.9 - 6.9 Nm (0.5 - 0.7 kgf-cm, 44 - 61 inch lbs). The engine idled smoothly, there were no vacuum leaks, the engine sounded strong during the dyno pulls and the air/fuel looked very good.

As for our telephone conversation... immediately after crunching the AAM Spacer numbers I called you and asked for your help in determining why your product didn't do well. At that time we agreed that our results were not typical and that you'd provide other stock engine-AAM Spacer dyno results. To date I have not received the promised information.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #38  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel350
9-10 HP increases in the 2000, 3500, 4000, 6400 RPM range. 3HP/3TQ peak gain

Thanks, Diesel. That sounds pretty good.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #39  
LODOSS's Avatar
LODOSS
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel350
9-10 HP increases in the 2000, 3500, 4000, 6400 RPM range. 3HP/3TQ peak gain
hm thats interseting. so for 300 hp cars... putting on a 287 hp lower plenum you gain power up till like 6500 rpm or so.. and for 287 hp cars if you put in the 300 hp lower plenum.. you make power..

something just doe'snt make much sense..

if that really is the case.. then we all should just start trading plenums =o
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #40  
publisher's Avatar
publisher
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
From: Larkspur, Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by devster
I'll have to check B & N tonight...
Let your fingers do the walking. Stay home and go to www.sportzmagazine.com. Click on the Order Page and have at it. We take MasterCard and Visa and back issues are mailed first class.

Save time, save gas --- click on www.sportzmagazine.com and relax.

BTW, while you're clicking, order a Sport Z Magazine T-Shirt.

One year subscription plus one T-shirt. Less than a full tank of premium gas. It's ho, ho, ho time.

Merry Christmas everybody.

Bob
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:34 PM.