Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently
View Poll Results: Is a CAI worth the money?
Yes
1
33.33%
no
1
33.33%
Did you not see the other 8,000 threads on this?
1
33.33%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll

FINALLY ANSWERED: What is the best __________ ? (Intake, Exhaust, headers, etc)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2017, 06:03 PM
  #401  
onevq35de
New Member
 
onevq35de's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Sweaty South NC
Posts: 607
Received 96 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Ah. It's a hobby for me as well but faster acceleration is a big part of that. I would more strongly consider what Admin tuning says than LMT as Admin's the only one with dyno results and he talks about it on another forum (google 3.5" intake 350z). Gives specifics between multiple intakes vs 3.5" with and without large bore t.b.
I sent NWP an email yesterday asking them about the dyno chart they have posted which looks nothing like any naturally aspirated DE I've ever seen. No word back yet. The chart they have for the "maxima with gutted intake" looks like our setup and the chart they have for our setup is totally unrecognizable. If I don't hear back from them but decide to move forward with the large bore, I'll buy a new tb for a buck-forty and send it to a guy that does nothing but bore tb's for $100. No adapter plate and no wire harness adapter either.
Old 12-08-2017, 06:38 PM
  #402  
onevq35de
New Member
 
onevq35de's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Sweaty South NC
Posts: 607
Received 96 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

I looked back over the NWP dyno charts. Something just doesn't pass the smell test. I sent'em another email which is posted below. I'm sure there are others reading this who have yet to comment. If you are in the know about a large bore tb used in conjunction with a large intake, please chime in. The charts on their site don't mention anything about utilizing a large intake pipe.

"Sorry to harp on this Aaron. I really don't mean to sound like I'm digging on your product, just trying to understand what I'm looking at. I looked at the charts again on your site. If the chart for the 350z/g35 is actually for the maxima, it still doesn't jive unless the maxima was mucho modified.

stock intake 2002 maxima 195/202
gutted intake 2002 maxima 266/244
350z/g35 2006 242/246

The first chart for the maxima is believable, knowing it makes 255hp/246tq at the flywheel.
There's a massive jump in power between the 2 maximas above with the only listed difference being a gutted intake?
The chart for the 350z/g35 is not for these 2 cars. I don't know what the chart is for, but it's not a vq35de in a 350z, g35 or fx35.
Please tell me what I'm missing. I'm participating in a running thread and inquiring minds want to know.
Thanks"
Edit 3/5/18 - it works.

Last edited by onevq35de; 03-05-2018 at 02:39 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
04-04-2016 07:52 AM
350z82
Exterior & Interior
19
10-01-2015 06:25 PM
Sleeper_Z
Forced Induction
3
09-30-2015 10:25 AM



Quick Reply: FINALLY ANSWERED: What is the best __________ ? (Intake, Exhaust, headers, etc)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:31 PM.