Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

ITB's available soon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2007, 09:56 AM
  #61  
zxman69
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
zxman69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: florida
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just a quick note for you guys.The kits will be shipping out from England hopefully this Friday. I will post up more photo of them when they are here. Chris aka NA&ch will hopefully be making a trip across the state to look at them and I'm sure he will take some photos and give you his impressions s well. As soon as we get the air boxes and pedal adaptors designed and tested we will begin taking orders, right now the ones I have sold are going out to shops and race teams to get their feedback. xlr8r was asking about the plate sizes. They are staight 48 mm for the standard street kit and 52 tapering down to 48 on the street/full race kits. Sorry I haven't been on here more to answer everyones questions but my job makes a lot of demands on my time.
Neil
Old 10-17-2007, 11:20 AM
  #62  
buzzardmountain
New Member
iTrader: (17)
 
buzzardmountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Flying Low....
Posts: 9,898
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zxman69
Just a quick note for you guys.The kits will be shipping out from England hopefully this Friday. I will post up more photo of them when they are here. Chris aka NA&ch will hopefully be making a trip across the state to look at them and I'm sure he will take some photos and give you his impressions s well. As soon as we get the air boxes and pedal adaptors designed and tested we will begin taking orders, right now the ones I have sold are going out to shops and race teams to get their feedback. xlr8r was asking about the plate sizes. They are staight 48 mm for the standard street kit and 52 tapering down to 48 on the street/full race kits. Sorry I haven't been on here more to answer everyones questions but my job makes a lot of demands on my time.
Neil
No problem......just stick around and keep us updated.

Alot of times are hopes are raised and then people vanish....lol
Old 10-17-2007, 11:57 AM
  #63  
xlr8r
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
xlr8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SLC
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zxman69
Just a quick note for you guys.The kits will be shipping out from England hopefully this Friday. I will post up more photo of them when they are here. Chris aka NA&ch will hopefully be making a trip across the state to look at them and I'm sure he will take some photos and give you his impressions s well. As soon as we get the air boxes and pedal adaptors designed and tested we will begin taking orders, right now the ones I have sold are going out to shops and race teams to get their feedback. xlr8r was asking about the plate sizes. They are staight 48 mm for the standard street kit and 52 tapering down to 48 on the street/full race kits. Sorry I haven't been on here more to answer everyones questions but my job makes a lot of demands on my time.
Neil
Nice, 48mm is what I have calculated to be a good size for a street VQ.
Old 10-19-2007, 04:06 PM
  #64  
buzzardmountain
New Member
iTrader: (17)
 
buzzardmountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Flying Low....
Posts: 9,898
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I hope they shipped today....

bump.

Old 10-20-2007, 05:34 PM
  #65  
BigZ88
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
BigZ88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xlr8r
Nice, 48mm is what I have calculated to be a good size for a street VQ.

I'd love to see your calculations on this....
Old 10-20-2007, 07:26 PM
  #66  
xlr8r
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
xlr8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SLC
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigZ88
I'd love to see your calculations on this....
Go to the jenvey site & it has some go info you Throttle body plate sizing. Per there recomendations 48mm is actually a little big for a the amount of power a street VQ would be expected to make, but it seems most ITB setups are a little larger than what Jenveys recomendations since a few other things factor it like throttle plate distance from injectors, horn length, etc.

Another things that makes 48mm seem appropriate is that the OEM intake runners at their most "round" spot, where the lower plenum bolts to the runners, is 48mm.

I've been preparing to make a custom set of ITB's I have been going back & forth between 46mm or 50mm, 48mm is the happy medium.

Last edited by xlr8r; 10-20-2007 at 07:29 PM.
Old 10-21-2007, 03:53 PM
  #67  
BigZ88
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
BigZ88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dont want to get off topic, but you said YOU had calculations... my logic tells me that ITB's of the same size as the runners on the plenum will flow WAY more air...
Old 10-24-2007, 10:37 PM
  #68  
Broaner
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Broaner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm very interested to see how this continues to develope.
Old 10-25-2007, 04:54 AM
  #69  
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Julian@MRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Spotswood NJ
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

DBW+stock ecu+ ITB's= fail
Emanage,no worky..Full Standalone needed.
Nice hardparts.
Old 10-25-2007, 05:07 AM
  #70  
MI 35th
OGPremierMafia
iTrader: (16)
 
MI 35th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 5,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bump, subbing for more info.
Old 10-25-2007, 05:38 AM
  #71  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

full standalone would not be needed actually....UTEC + Map sensor, in theory, would work just fine (no idea if the resolution is enough, but by eliminating the maf, it should work just fine
Old 10-25-2007, 05:40 AM
  #72  
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Julian@MRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Spotswood NJ
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
full standalone would not be needed actually....UTEC + Map sensor, in theory, would work just fine (no idea if the resolution is enough, but by eliminating the maf, it should work just fine
What happens when the stock ECU throws the car into safe mode cause it does not pick up a TPs sensor?Would the utec over run that?We never tried the UTEC in that set up,although in theory it would work.
Old 10-25-2007, 05:41 AM
  #73  
MI 35th
OGPremierMafia
iTrader: (16)
 
MI 35th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 5,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would think about these @ the 2k price range, but 3500... that is damn high!

Fortunately when these hit the market it wont be too long before someone else has another version.
Old 10-25-2007, 05:42 AM
  #74  
MI 35th
OGPremierMafia
iTrader: (16)
 
MI 35th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 5,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
What happens when the stock ECU throws the car into safe mode cause it does not pick up a TPs sensor?Would the utec over run that?We never tried the UTEC in that set up,although in theory it would work.
you would just have to rig up a resistor to send the signal to ecu that the car is always at idle, then tune for that map.
Old 10-25-2007, 05:45 AM
  #75  
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Julian@MRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Spotswood NJ
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MI 35th
you would just have to rig up a resistor to send the signal to ecu that the car is always at idle, then tune for that map.
Hmmmm...Got me thinking..
Old 10-25-2007, 05:49 AM
  #76  
westpak
SFZCC
iTrader: (19)
 
westpak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 7,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you take the MAF out you will also need a temp sensor in addition to the map sensor.
Old 10-25-2007, 06:04 AM
  #77  
xlr8r
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
xlr8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SLC
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's kind of hard to believe people are considering using a piggyback to tune ITB's. As great & proven as Utec is I think you'll save yourself a lot of trouble by using a standalone. Itb's are known to be difficult to tune & you need a fair amount of resolution to get them running right in the lower RPM's. You might be able to get a decent tune with Utec, but after all the hoops & hurdles you have to jump through will it be worth it in comparison to just going with a standalone?
Old 10-25-2007, 08:02 AM
  #78  
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Quamen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

In regards to the TPS don't forget that there is actually two of them. One that is 5-0v and another that is 0v-5v.
Old 10-25-2007, 08:12 AM
  #79  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MI 35th
I would think about these @ the 2k price range, but 3500... that is damn high!

Fortunately when these hit the market it wont be too long before someone else has another version.
I would doubt highly anyone would bother coming out with yet another ITB setup, let alone for less money. Around $3k would be the floor for something like this to sell at, given the time and cost of materials to make it (namely, the lower plenum, which is not cheap to make no matter how you do it)
Old 10-25-2007, 08:16 AM
  #80  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xlr8r
It's kind of hard to believe people are considering using a piggyback to tune ITB's. As great & proven as Utec is I think you'll save yourself a lot of trouble by using a standalone. Itb's are known to be difficult to tune & you need a fair amount of resolution to get them running right in the lower RPM's. You might be able to get a decent tune with Utec, but after all the hoops & hurdles you have to jump through will it be worth it in comparison to just going with a standalone?
On an FI setup I'd agree, on a NA setup though I just don't see it being the case. What hoops and hurdles? A MAP sensor and AIT sensor are by no means hard, and any other certainly not beyond the level that anyone even considering ITB's would be able to accomplish. This is not a mod for a stock motor, and not a mod for anyone looking for the absolute enth degree of NA performance from their built motor.

Let's also not forget not every standalone can control ITB's either, at least out of the box. So the "hurdles" could be the same no matter which route you go.

Would a standalone be better with ITB's on an NA car? Maybe, maybe not - once again, all depends on the level of expertise of the person punching the keys

Like anything else you do to a car, the "hard parts" are only one small component - the person doing the tuning is probably the most under rated, and necessary part of the equation (assuming you are using quality parts that fit and were designed for a specific application and/or function).

Personally, I'm not going for this on my own car as I just don't see the need given my setup (relative to the cost), but I applaud someone for taking the initiative to do it.

Last edited by Z1 Performance; 10-25-2007 at 08:21 AM.


Quick Reply: ITB's available soon



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 AM.