Plenum Shootout test.
No. What I'm telling you was clearly stated and articulated in my post that you quoted. So quit trying to put words in my mouth. I'm not saying that nothing can be learned from all those builds in the Shop Build section, but I also wouldn't recommend or support any of them being used for a plenum spacer shootout. BTW... More than 1% of the community has upgraded cams.Bottom line: The Cosworth plenum is for motors with cams and extended rev range, that thus far has been shown to be a better performer for FI applications than NA. Z1 already explained the Cosworth to you back in September, so I'm not going to continue this circular argument with you either.
https://my350z.com/forum/7792174-post51.html

https://my350z.com/forum/7792174-post51.html
Last edited by gabe3d; Oct 30, 2009 at 02:10 PM.
First and last warning: Keep this thread civil. Absolutely no name calling, belittling, disparaging, denouncing, etc. All of you who aren't directly involved (i.e., OP, MD, Intense, dyno operator, etc) have no reason to add your 2 cents in as it only seems to fuel the fire. If you cannot relay your thoughts in a mature fashion without going overboard with unnecessary remarks, I implore you to stay away from this thread.
I have great respect for both companies and I'd hate for this BS to continue on any longer
I have great respect for both companies and I'd hate for this BS to continue on any longer
If there ever were two people who could train wreck a thread, its always the same two.
Thank you,
Tony
PS - You know anybody local to you who would like to dyno a Motordyne spacer on their REVUP?
Wow. I'm interested to see the results of this on ANY car. It'd be great to have a few cars at the testing time. Stock, yours, couple other bolt on modded cars, and a FI. REV and non-rev.
Seems to me that people don't understand the concept of a friendly warning. If you made a post with negative connotations after my warning in bright red just above that is now gone, consider that to be your warning. My next warning will come paired with a little vacation time. If it did not have any negativity but was deleted, I found it to be irrelevant to the topic at hand (the OP's topic).
Seems to me that people don't understand the concept of a friendly warning. If you made a post with negative connotations after my warning in bright red just above that is now gone, consider that to be your warning. My next warning will come paired with a little vacation time. If it did not have any negativity but was deleted, I found it to be irrelevant to the topic at hand (the OP's topic).
QuickSilver,
Mistake on my part for the previous reply, I thought you were addressing me since you didn't quote anyone.
YOU ASKED FOR IT.
Darren
Darren
Intense was fired for insisting on getting a lower price than any of the other dealers. I said no. Intense insisted on getting their dealer discount on top of the Christmas sale discount that was running. I said no.
Intense made threats to me that I was obligated to give them their dealer discount on top of the Christmas sale discount. Are you crazy? I don't care how BIG they are.
I don't need to do business with anyone who dictates terms to me.
We can discuss all that if you like, but putting lipstick on the 800LB gorilla in the room won't make it go away. You can look away from it but its still there.
Intense made threats to me that I was obligated to give them their dealer discount on top of the Christmas sale discount. Are you crazy? I don't care how BIG they are.
I don't need to do business with anyone who dictates terms to me.
We can discuss all that if you like, but putting lipstick on the 800LB gorilla in the room won't make it go away. You can look away from it but its still there.
KA,
That is a very legitimate point to bring up. Yet I don't agree with the results. Never did. It is inaccurate. I can also site several more similar and inaccurate references with plenum mod testing. What you see there is an artifact of the ECU changes in timing and plenum temperatures.
Just like Throttle Body spacers. Testing that can show phantom gains one dyno set and the gains disappear the next. We all know throttle body spacers don't work. There is no physical reason for them to work but it can be really easy to make them show a gain. This is exactly how a spacer can be made to show phantom gains on a REVUP engine.
The ECU showing phantom gains is also one of the things I have been discussing on the forums for years. When it comes to dyno testing there are many variables to control.
ECU and thermal "controls" must be implemented for accurate A/B dyno comparisons. It will all become clear once you see the properly controlled, accurate and independent testing.
Not just Gabe3d's but also with testing performed by MY350Z admin. A complete description of the testing and controls will be provided.
EDIT: Please see this throttle body spacer testing link. At a minimum, read this whole page.
http://g35driver.com/forums/intake-e...-spacer-8.html
It was a test performed on the throttle body spacer where baseline was taken. Post TB spacer install testing showed ~10HP gain. TB spacer was then removed and it showed the same 10HP gain over the first baseline.
The gains seen seen in the TB test were nothing more than phantom gains. It was ECU and thermal variables moving around.
That is a very legitimate point to bring up. Yet I don't agree with the results. Never did. It is inaccurate. I can also site several more similar and inaccurate references with plenum mod testing. What you see there is an artifact of the ECU changes in timing and plenum temperatures.
Just like Throttle Body spacers. Testing that can show phantom gains one dyno set and the gains disappear the next. We all know throttle body spacers don't work. There is no physical reason for them to work but it can be really easy to make them show a gain. This is exactly how a spacer can be made to show phantom gains on a REVUP engine.
The ECU showing phantom gains is also one of the things I have been discussing on the forums for years. When it comes to dyno testing there are many variables to control.
ECU and thermal "controls" must be implemented for accurate A/B dyno comparisons. It will all become clear once you see the properly controlled, accurate and independent testing.
Not just Gabe3d's but also with testing performed by MY350Z admin. A complete description of the testing and controls will be provided.
EDIT: Please see this throttle body spacer testing link. At a minimum, read this whole page.
http://g35driver.com/forums/intake-e...-spacer-8.html
It was a test performed on the throttle body spacer where baseline was taken. Post TB spacer install testing showed ~10HP gain. TB spacer was then removed and it showed the same 10HP gain over the first baseline.
The gains seen seen in the TB test were nothing more than phantom gains. It was ECU and thermal variables moving around.
Last edited by Hydrazine; Nov 2, 2009 at 06:40 AM.
Thank you for the offer. There is other testing coming up soon.
It may not be necessary to do additional tests but lets go through the first couple of independent tests first.
Tony
It may not be necessary to do additional tests but lets go through the first couple of independent tests first.
Tony
Not a problem, I just spent the last 4 hrs of my life reading all the BS you and Intense are going thru.
I have no affiliation with either of you, I can't my G is bone stock.
Yet I do know the mods I want for it, by doing my homework and reading many post in many threads, both here and G35Driver.
The shop that will do my work is Injected Performance, I just wanted to throw my G out the to be used because its still stock.
I have no affiliation with either of you, I can't my G is bone stock.
Yet I do know the mods I want for it, by doing my homework and reading many post in many threads, both here and G35Driver.
The shop that will do my work is Injected Performance, I just wanted to throw my G out the to be used because its still stock.
First and last warning: Keep this thread civil. Absolutely no name calling, belittling, disparaging, denouncing, etc. All of you who aren't directly involved (i.e., OP, MD, Intense, dyno operator, etc) have no reason to add your 2 cents in as it only seems to fuel the fire. If you cannot relay your thoughts in a mature fashion without going overboard with unnecessary remarks, I implore you to stay away from this thread.
I have great respect for both companies and I'd hate for this BS to continue on any longer
I have great respect for both companies and I'd hate for this BS to continue on any longer
Seems to me that people don't understand the concept of a friendly warning. If you made a post with negative connotations after my warning in bright red just above that is now gone, consider that to be your warning. My next warning will come paired with a little vacation time. If it did not have any negativity but was deleted, I found it to be irrelevant to the topic at hand (the OP's topic).
7 days off...
VO
I will post again. I have a 2005 6mt non rev with intake and exhaust. I will Dyno both or more whoever else wants to join and I will video record and post results. I will go thru CIN Motorsports who them nor me have connections with any of u. I wan to show unbias results bc members need to know best bang for the buck and not inflated dyno graphs by vendors.
Edit-Thi is not intended to start crap.
Edit-Thi is not intended to start crap.
Last edited by 2004Black350z; Nov 12, 2009 at 03:16 PM.




