Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

Ram for AEM/Nismo CAI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 10:56 AM
  #21  
roark's Avatar
roark
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Va Beach
Default

Here's what the G-tech Pro Competition had to say about all of these little mods. The red is stock + Nismo CAI only. The green is the addition of the ram and heat shield, and the blue is with the fender liner holes blocked.

Not shown is the speed in this comparison, which is approx. 35-40 mph. Further up the graph, above 50 mph, the blue line crosses above the green until at peak HP, in 4th gear at about 85 mph, I got over 3 RWHP increase with the vents blocked.
Attached Thumbnails Ram for AEM/Nismo CAI-cai-alone-then-ram-then-blocked-vents-reduced.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 01:52 PM
  #22  
zxsaint's Avatar
zxsaint
Fairlady Stalker
Premier Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 0
From: Studio City, CA
Default

Why is the rwhp showing up so low? It should be at least 20-30 more.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 04:07 PM
  #23  
roark's Avatar
roark
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Va Beach
Default

Originally posted by zxsaint
Why is the rwhp showing up so low? It should be at least 20-30 more.
Ah,

I was waiting for someone to ask that. Good question.

Part of the reason that the number seems low is that the car is moving, therefore incurring drag. In this respect, the G-tech is a better guage of a car's overall performance than a dyno.

The second reason for the low numbers is that for these runs I put in the gross vehicle weight - and did not add weight of the fuel or my fat a$$.

I have another series of numbers with the weights adjusted, but I didn't have the third (blue) run (the landfill was closed on Sunday) so it it would not have been complete for the illustration I was trying to make.

Regards,

Roark
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2003 | 01:53 AM
  #24  
jreiter's Avatar
jreiter
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
From: san luis obispo, ca
Default

You can dramatically reduce the variability of the car's weight by putting the car into an easily reproducable state and weighing it. For example:

Fill the gas up to full (as this is the largest weight variable), top off the other fluids, and make sure you have no cargo in the car (unless it's consistently always there). Then weigh the car. This state can always be returned to by topping off your gas and fluids. No need to weigh the car everytime, as it's pretty safe to assume the car weighs the same if you follow those procedures. You might want to weigh yourself, though, before each run.

I follow this procedure with my G-tech, and it has provided me with accurate and extremely reproducable results with no need to re-weigh my car all the time.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2003 | 05:41 AM
  #25  
roark's Avatar
roark
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Va Beach
Default

Yes, that is easily reproducable, and if that is your baseline procedure, then you will have accurate results for HP/TQ.

But a full tank of gas is not ideal for testing your times. I doubt I could get 14.2 in the quarter mile if I used a full tank. I've gotten a shade under 14 by always trying to have less than a 1/4 tank of gas during my runs. Remember, premium fuel weighs about 7 lbs/gallon. That's over 100 lbs diffence between full and 1/4 tank.

Whatever procedure works is great. Just plan and execute your baseline and reproduce it for subsequent runs and you will have exellent results.

I take 8 runs for each test. I know (because the G-tech shows it) that there is a slight grade in the strip I use to test. So I take 4 runs (2 in each direction) with the G-Tech calibrated to actual weight (if possible.) Then I repeat the process with the G-Tech calibrated to GVW. I compare the averages of the two sets of runs against the previous set taken before the mod to make my determination on the effectiveness of the modification.

I always set my tires to 32.0 ft-lbs. and check them between sets of runs. The temperature sensors in the rims are not that accurate, so I use a digital tire pressure guage.

Also, I only do my runs when the ambient temperature is between 75 and 85 degrees F. That mitigates any error introduced by colder/denser air vs. warmer air. I'm running shy of those warm days where I live, so my next mod (UR Underdrive Pulleys) may not get tested right away.

One last thing. The G-Tech does not store things like ambient temperature, wind speed, so it's a good idea to keep a journal of your runs with as much detail as possible. When you go back and look at all of the files of your runs, it can be confusing what runs are for what mods.

Roark

Last edited by roark; Oct 17, 2003 at 05:47 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 07:16 PM
  #26  
roark's Avatar
roark
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Va Beach
Default template dimensions

Originally posted by roark
Next, I created a template for the new ram out of heavy card stock. It took a while, pasting bits and pieces together, then transfering the final design to a clean sheet, but here's the final template.
A couple of guys asked me to post the dimensions of the template I used to create the ram. Here you go.
Attached Thumbnails Ram for AEM/Nismo CAI-ram-dimensions.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 06:18 AM
  #27  
Lucino's Avatar
Lucino
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Default

nice info....thx
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 07:16 AM
  #28  
Zzzow!'s Avatar
Zzzow!
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Thumbs up

Thanks Roark! Great info!!!
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 10:37 PM
  #29  
350z-z33's Avatar
350z-z33
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 899
Likes: 1
From: New York City, NY
Thumbs up

Excellent DIY project info, thanks!
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 11:29 PM
  #30  
ZilvahZ's Avatar
ZilvahZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Default

Great post Roark! Excellent job on this project.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 06:00 AM
  #31  
roark's Avatar
roark
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Va Beach
Default

Thanks everyone for all of the positive feedback.

I'm making two more of these for guys on the forum that want them. While I'm at it does anyone else want this kit? I'm asking $70 for the ram and $50 for the heat shield (or both for $110) plus shipping.

Only serious inquiries PM me please. I'll be fabricating these this week.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Z King
Vendor Wanted
13
Oct 22, 2015 11:39 AM
z33z_nutz
Intake Exhaust
22
Sep 23, 2015 07:22 PM
torchkc
Engine & Drivetrain
11
Sep 11, 2015 08:26 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:07 AM.