Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

3", 3.5", & 4" intakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2017, 12:37 PM
  #41  
RENFRO
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RENFRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,108
Received 105 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jellofuel
When's your scheduled dyno? I might just meet you there lol.

This would be the first I've heard of the admin intake being tested against the Z1 m-spec race intake, so I'm definitely interested in the results. Are you getting the admin short or long tube intake?
I haven't scheduled just yet due to the lead time for the admin intake. Says 4-6 weeks to ship, but once I know for sure I'll call up Z1 and get on the calendar.

I actually modified the race intake into a short ram and added some tubing to the front bumper to get cool air up to the filter element. The way my oil cooler was set up with the long ram, it wasn't able to get cool air when driving. One night with about 70 degree ambient temps, I was seeing around 126 degree intake temps on the highway.

After I modified into a short ram and added the tubing, it dropped to about +4 degree over ambient intake temps.

So, long story short, I went with the short ram admin intake. I plan to remove the brace from the Z1 intake and have it welded to the admin tube since it doesn't have one, and I also plan to build a box around the filter element to help with heat issues.

I'll be sure to let you know back on here once I have a date set up for the dyno.
Old 12-13-2017, 07:24 AM
  #42  
RENFRO
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RENFRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,108
Received 105 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Quick update:

Intake should be shipping by the end of the week.

I've been seeing lots of chat about what adding a velocity stack does to help with power, so I picked up a 3.5" velocity stack/filter combo from Blox racing to do a before and after test of that as well.

My hope is to get down to Z1 sometime next week if I can.
Old 12-26-2017, 03:54 PM
  #43  
RENFRO
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RENFRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,108
Received 105 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Update:

Intake arrived from Admin Tuning. Took about 5 weeks, but it's a very beautiful, well made piece.

So I decided to hack it up

I needed to take off a bit of the end so I could run a universal 3.5" velocity stack.

I am driving down to Z1 Motorsports tomorrow to hang out for a while. Tuning will be done on Thursday.

If anyone is going to be in the area the next couple of days, be sure to drop by.

I'll report back here with dyno results.

My last numbers were about 293whp/275wtq.

Car is an 03 DE with Tomei 272 cams and a bunch of other supporting mods.

Looking forward to seeing what this intake/velocity stack will do.

3", 3.5", & 4" intakes-wwibojg.jpg
Old 12-28-2017, 07:48 PM
  #44  
RENFRO
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RENFRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,108
Received 105 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Got on the dyno today for some tuning.

Final numbers were 304whp/280wtq.

Total change was about 12hp/12tq.

The colder temps definitely played a factor, but there's also no doubt in my mind that the intake performed well.

The guys at Z1 are putting together a post for social media and a video, so once I have those I will post here.
The following users liked this post:
terrasmak (01-02-2018)
Old 12-29-2017, 03:59 AM
  #45  
jellofuel
New Member
 
jellofuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Carrollton, GA
Posts: 159
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RENFRO
Got on the dyno today for some tuning.

Final numbers were 304whp/280wtq.

Total change was about 12hp/12tq.

The colder temps definitely played a factor, but there's also no doubt in my mind that the intake performed well.

The guys at Z1 are putting together a post for social media and a video, so once I have those I will post here.
Solid numbers! So the only change was the intake? If I remember right, you'd converted the m-spec race intake into short ram, and then swapped in the Admin Tuning intake?
Old 12-29-2017, 02:06 PM
  #46  
RENFRO
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RENFRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,108
Received 105 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jellofuel
Solid numbers! So the only change was the intake? If I remember right, you'd converted the m-spec race intake into short ram, and then swapped in the Admin Tuning intake?
That's correct, and I misspoke earlier. I actually picked up 27rwtq from my previous run earlier in the year. At the time, it still had the full long ram, but yes I ended up converting it to a short ram in order to drop my intake temps down. That was mainly just due to where the oil cooler was located, as it wasn't allowing cool air to reach the filter element. Instead of moving the cooler, I just ran some ducting from Pegasus racing to dump ambient air on the filter while driving. Worked great.
Old 12-29-2017, 02:08 PM
  #47  
RENFRO
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RENFRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,108
Received 105 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Here's the chart.

Final numbers from my previous post I had to go look up were +12-13rwhp/+27rwtq.

Now, keep in mind a part of this was due to the much cooler air as compared to my first dyno, but there's still no doubting the larger bore Admin intake performs.

3", 3.5", & 4" intakes-ypktkem.jpg
The following users liked this post:
BluestreamDE (12-29-2017)
Old 12-29-2017, 02:11 PM
  #48  
RENFRO
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RENFRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,108
Received 105 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

and for comparison's sake, here's my old dyno.

3", 3.5", & 4" intakes-pu5gv5t.jpg
Old 12-31-2017, 04:50 AM
  #49  
dnash
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
dnash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 131
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The power gains are good and the torque excellent but what I find interesting is that the peak power rpm is now lower. I would have expected the opposite. Either way, the car should be faster now.

Last edited by dnash; 12-31-2017 at 05:50 AM.
Old 12-31-2017, 03:30 PM
  #50  
RENFRO
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RENFRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,108
Received 105 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dnash
The power gains are good and the torque excellent but what I find interesting is that the peak power rpm is now lower. I would have expected the opposite. Either way, the car should be faster now.
I thought the same thing. Very curious to see that, but it's definitely faster. Much more pull through the mid-range with the extra torque.
Old 01-02-2018, 10:06 AM
  #51  
Moncef
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Moncef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 84
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Thank you Alex for the good feedback. The gains are very much in line with the original testing I did with Saul in California over other off the shelf intakes.
Old 01-02-2018, 10:15 AM
  #52  
Moncef
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Moncef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 84
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RENFRO
I thought the same thing. Very curious to see that, but it's definitely faster. Much more pull through the mid-range with the extra torque.
Originally Posted by dnash
The power gains are good and the torque excellent but what I find interesting is that the peak power rpm is now lower. I would have expected the opposite. Either way, the car should be faster now.
Good observations, you are still making more power at your old peak RPM in spite of peaking earlier. Being able to make more power earlier may have been something the larger intake allowed the tuner to do (taking advantage of more cam overlap possibly), but that is just speculation.
The following users liked this post:
RENFRO (01-02-2018)
Old 01-02-2018, 03:35 PM
  #53  
RENFRO
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RENFRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,108
Received 105 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Moncef
Good observations, you are still making more power at your old peak RPM in spite of peaking earlier. Being able to make more power earlier may have been something the larger intake allowed the tuner to do (taking advantage of more cam overlap possibly), but that is just speculation.
yeah man that's a great point. I'm thrilled with the results. the car is such a blast to drive!
Old 02-05-2018, 04:52 PM
  #54  
dboyzalter
6 inch cawk is my fave!
iTrader: (3)
 
dboyzalter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Mass
Posts: 6,557
Received 972 Likes on 759 Posts
Default

Taking a brand new $350 intake and cutting a 5 inch chunk off takes some big brass ones.
Old 02-05-2018, 10:46 PM
  #55  
DarkZ03
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
DarkZ03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Des Plaines
Posts: 2,565
Received 487 Likes on 407 Posts
Default

I would do it if I ever got it, that way I can put a velocity stack on it.
Old 02-05-2018, 10:50 PM
  #56  
bealljk
350Z-holic
iTrader: (13)
 
bealljk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: North Denver
Posts: 6,358
Received 1,282 Likes on 1,007 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dboyzalter
Taking a brand new $350 intake and cutting a 5 inch chunk off takes some big brass ones.
I wish I was only $350 deep in my build...
Old 02-07-2018, 02:50 AM
  #57  
Conway_160
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Conway_160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pan Handle
Posts: 2,559
Received 341 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bealljk
I wish I was only $350 deep in my build...
Don't we all.
Old 02-10-2018, 07:08 AM
  #58  
RENFRO
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RENFRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,108
Received 105 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

haha, trust me...it took a little bit to convince myself to hack that much off of it right after I got it. Happy that I did though. The addition of the velocity stack was a must in my book.
Old 02-10-2018, 05:38 PM
  #59  
06platinumG
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
06platinumG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NE Tacoma
Posts: 243
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RENFRO
Quick update:

I picked up a 3.5" velocity stack/filter combo from Blox racing to do a before and after test of that as well..
Did you do a before n after with the velocity stack vs. the one that comes from Admin
Old 02-12-2018, 05:31 PM
  #60  
RENFRO
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RENFRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,108
Received 105 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 06platinumG
Did you do a before n after with the velocity stack vs. the one that comes from Admin
No I didn't, but no velocity stack comes with the admin intake. I did lots of research into them and the benefits were obvious to me. Plenty of other independent dyno testing on velocity stacks out there, so I decided to just stick with it.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:18 AM.