Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

3", 3.5", & 4" intakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2017 | 12:37 PM
  #41  
RENFRO's Avatar
RENFRO
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 114
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by jellofuel
When's your scheduled dyno? I might just meet you there lol.

This would be the first I've heard of the admin intake being tested against the Z1 m-spec race intake, so I'm definitely interested in the results. Are you getting the admin short or long tube intake?
I haven't scheduled just yet due to the lead time for the admin intake. Says 4-6 weeks to ship, but once I know for sure I'll call up Z1 and get on the calendar.

I actually modified the race intake into a short ram and added some tubing to the front bumper to get cool air up to the filter element. The way my oil cooler was set up with the long ram, it wasn't able to get cool air when driving. One night with about 70 degree ambient temps, I was seeing around 126 degree intake temps on the highway.

After I modified into a short ram and added the tubing, it dropped to about +4 degree over ambient intake temps.

So, long story short, I went with the short ram admin intake. I plan to remove the brace from the Z1 intake and have it welded to the admin tube since it doesn't have one, and I also plan to build a box around the filter element to help with heat issues.

I'll be sure to let you know back on here once I have a date set up for the dyno.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2017 | 07:24 AM
  #42  
RENFRO's Avatar
RENFRO
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 114
From: Tennessee
Default

Quick update:

Intake should be shipping by the end of the week.

I've been seeing lots of chat about what adding a velocity stack does to help with power, so I picked up a 3.5" velocity stack/filter combo from Blox racing to do a before and after test of that as well.

My hope is to get down to Z1 sometime next week if I can.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2017 | 03:54 PM
  #43  
RENFRO's Avatar
RENFRO
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 114
From: Tennessee
Default

Update:

Intake arrived from Admin Tuning. Took about 5 weeks, but it's a very beautiful, well made piece.

So I decided to hack it up

I needed to take off a bit of the end so I could run a universal 3.5" velocity stack.

I am driving down to Z1 Motorsports tomorrow to hang out for a while. Tuning will be done on Thursday.

If anyone is going to be in the area the next couple of days, be sure to drop by.

I'll report back here with dyno results.

My last numbers were about 293whp/275wtq.

Car is an 03 DE with Tomei 272 cams and a bunch of other supporting mods.

Looking forward to seeing what this intake/velocity stack will do.

3", 3.5", & 4" intakes-wwibojg.jpg
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2017 | 07:48 PM
  #44  
RENFRO's Avatar
RENFRO
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 114
From: Tennessee
Default

Got on the dyno today for some tuning.

Final numbers were 304whp/280wtq.

Total change was about 12hp/12tq.

The colder temps definitely played a factor, but there's also no doubt in my mind that the intake performed well.

The guys at Z1 are putting together a post for social media and a video, so once I have those I will post here.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2017 | 03:59 AM
  #45  
jellofuel's Avatar
jellofuel
New Member
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 159
Likes: 49
From: Carrollton, GA
Default

Originally Posted by RENFRO
Got on the dyno today for some tuning.

Final numbers were 304whp/280wtq.

Total change was about 12hp/12tq.

The colder temps definitely played a factor, but there's also no doubt in my mind that the intake performed well.

The guys at Z1 are putting together a post for social media and a video, so once I have those I will post here.
Solid numbers! So the only change was the intake? If I remember right, you'd converted the m-spec race intake into short ram, and then swapped in the Admin Tuning intake?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2017 | 02:06 PM
  #46  
RENFRO's Avatar
RENFRO
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 114
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by jellofuel
Solid numbers! So the only change was the intake? If I remember right, you'd converted the m-spec race intake into short ram, and then swapped in the Admin Tuning intake?
That's correct, and I misspoke earlier. I actually picked up 27rwtq from my previous run earlier in the year. At the time, it still had the full long ram, but yes I ended up converting it to a short ram in order to drop my intake temps down. That was mainly just due to where the oil cooler was located, as it wasn't allowing cool air to reach the filter element. Instead of moving the cooler, I just ran some ducting from Pegasus racing to dump ambient air on the filter while driving. Worked great.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2017 | 02:08 PM
  #47  
RENFRO's Avatar
RENFRO
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 114
From: Tennessee
Default

Here's the chart.

Final numbers from my previous post I had to go look up were +12-13rwhp/+27rwtq.

Now, keep in mind a part of this was due to the much cooler air as compared to my first dyno, but there's still no doubting the larger bore Admin intake performs.

3", 3.5", & 4" intakes-ypktkem.jpg
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2017 | 02:11 PM
  #48  
RENFRO's Avatar
RENFRO
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 114
From: Tennessee
Default

and for comparison's sake, here's my old dyno.

3", 3.5", & 4" intakes-pu5gv5t.jpg
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2017 | 04:50 AM
  #49  
dnash's Avatar
dnash
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 13
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

The power gains are good and the torque excellent but what I find interesting is that the peak power rpm is now lower. I would have expected the opposite. Either way, the car should be faster now.

Last edited by dnash; Dec 31, 2017 at 05:50 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2017 | 03:30 PM
  #50  
RENFRO's Avatar
RENFRO
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 114
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by dnash
The power gains are good and the torque excellent but what I find interesting is that the peak power rpm is now lower. I would have expected the opposite. Either way, the car should be faster now.
I thought the same thing. Very curious to see that, but it's definitely faster. Much more pull through the mid-range with the extra torque.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2018 | 10:06 AM
  #51  
Moncef's Avatar
Moncef
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 7
From: USA
Default

Thank you Alex for the good feedback. The gains are very much in line with the original testing I did with Saul in California over other off the shelf intakes.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2018 | 10:15 AM
  #52  
Moncef's Avatar
Moncef
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 7
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by RENFRO
I thought the same thing. Very curious to see that, but it's definitely faster. Much more pull through the mid-range with the extra torque.
Originally Posted by dnash
The power gains are good and the torque excellent but what I find interesting is that the peak power rpm is now lower. I would have expected the opposite. Either way, the car should be faster now.
Good observations, you are still making more power at your old peak RPM in spite of peaking earlier. Being able to make more power earlier may have been something the larger intake allowed the tuner to do (taking advantage of more cam overlap possibly), but that is just speculation.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2018 | 03:35 PM
  #53  
RENFRO's Avatar
RENFRO
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 114
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by Moncef
Good observations, you are still making more power at your old peak RPM in spite of peaking earlier. Being able to make more power earlier may have been something the larger intake allowed the tuner to do (taking advantage of more cam overlap possibly), but that is just speculation.
yeah man that's a great point. I'm thrilled with the results. the car is such a blast to drive!
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2018 | 04:52 PM
  #54  
dboyzalter's Avatar
dboyzalter
6 inch cawk is my fave!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,556
Likes: 973
From: Mass
Default

Taking a brand new $350 intake and cutting a 5 inch chunk off takes some big brass ones.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2018 | 10:46 PM
  #55  
DarkZ03's Avatar
DarkZ03
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 549
From: Des Plaines
Default

I would do it if I ever got it, that way I can put a velocity stack on it.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2018 | 10:50 PM
  #56  
bealljk's Avatar
bealljk
350Z-holic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,504
Likes: 1,325
From: North Denver
Default

Originally Posted by dboyzalter
Taking a brand new $350 intake and cutting a 5 inch chunk off takes some big brass ones.
I wish I was only $350 deep in my build...
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2018 | 02:50 AM
  #57  
Conway_160's Avatar
Conway_160
New Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,589
Likes: 354
From: Pan Handle
Default

Originally Posted by bealljk
I wish I was only $350 deep in my build...
Don't we all.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2018 | 07:08 AM
  #58  
RENFRO's Avatar
RENFRO
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 114
From: Tennessee
Default

haha, trust me...it took a little bit to convince myself to hack that much off of it right after I got it. Happy that I did though. The addition of the velocity stack was a must in my book.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2018 | 05:38 PM
  #59  
06platinumG's Avatar
06platinumG
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 243
Likes: 15
From: NE Tacoma
Default

Originally Posted by RENFRO
Quick update:

I picked up a 3.5" velocity stack/filter combo from Blox racing to do a before and after test of that as well..
Did you do a before n after with the velocity stack vs. the one that comes from Admin
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2018 | 05:31 PM
  #60  
RENFRO's Avatar
RENFRO
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 114
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by 06platinumG
Did you do a before n after with the velocity stack vs. the one that comes from Admin
No I didn't, but no velocity stack comes with the admin intake. I did lots of research into them and the benefits were obvious to me. Plenty of other independent dyno testing on velocity stacks out there, so I decided to just stick with it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:09 PM.