Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

SSR Engineering Intake Manifold *Pics*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2004, 05:35 AM
  #21  
G35SC T.T.
Registered User
 
G35SC T.T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: secret
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its going on my car, should be on dyno this saturday, so we should have numbers hopefully this weekend.
and the altima made that kind of power with like 5 or 51/2 psi.
changing springs in waste gates right aj.
and he didnt blow that up.
stuff happens in high performance, like motors blowing, etc.
there was other stuff going on with that that people dont know about, and theres no reason to point fingers, tim is a very good guy and knows what he is doing.
Old 03-12-2004, 06:32 AM
  #22  
Phatmitzu
New Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Phatmitzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SoCal (626)
Posts: 2,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Humm...interesting. kinetix now?...or wait for SSR...
Old 03-12-2004, 07:34 AM
  #23  
SSR Engineering
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SSR Engineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by teh215
Any idea?
About a week
Old 03-12-2004, 07:46 AM
  #24  
Sosa
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Sosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SLO Town
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what's the estimated price?
Old 03-12-2004, 07:48 AM
  #25  
blubyu
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
blubyu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

make something for the VQ35 Maxima. Our intake manifolds breath like **** top end, I wished the 350z manifold would clear the hood on the Maxima. Im at 230whp now but it peaks at 5700 and then falls off. I know it has to do with the VI opening up earlier but the Manifold should breath better high end than it is currently
Old 03-12-2004, 08:20 AM
  #26  
JeffR116
Registered User
 
JeffR116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tacoma/Puyallup, WA
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looks promising. Keep us posted!
Old 03-12-2004, 10:11 AM
  #27  
350z_taquito
Registered User
 
350z_taquito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: asdf
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i don't like the design. fuel trim still isn't optimal since the runners are inline then split to feed the opposite banks of the v at the secondary runners (which i'm assuming you'll keep the stock ones). fuel trim would be much better if the runners exited the plenum in 2 adjacent rows of 3, each row feeding the 3 intake ports on each bank.
Old 03-12-2004, 10:18 AM
  #28  
teh215
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
teh215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Posts: 5,753
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If I understand what you are saying, then that would require a new lower manifold as well. This design only replaces the upper manifold.
Old 03-12-2004, 10:20 AM
  #29  
theZman
Registered User
 
theZman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not sure I follow. When you say "fuel trim still isn't optimal", what do you mean? Do you mean it won't be base pulse-width? If so, how do you know this?
Old 03-12-2004, 11:07 AM
  #30  
Ultimateone
New Member
 
Ultimateone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

any pics installed?
Old 03-12-2004, 11:23 AM
  #31  
350z_taquito
Registered User
 
350z_taquito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: asdf
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by theZman
I'm not sure I follow. When you say "fuel trim still isn't optimal", what do you mean? Do you mean it won't be base pulse-width? If so, how do you know this?
air flow variance between individual cylinders and the accompanying fuel requirements. you want get as close as possible to equal airflow into each cylinder, and tune each cylinder's injector flow rate accordingly.
Old 03-12-2004, 11:24 AM
  #32  
350z_taquito
Registered User
 
350z_taquito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: asdf
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by teh215
If I understand what you are saying, then that would require a new lower manifold as well. This design only replaces the upper manifold.
yes, or just incorporate everything into one manifold w/ longer runners.
Old 03-12-2004, 02:12 PM
  #33  
teh215
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
teh215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Posts: 5,753
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Has anyone contacted Hogan Manifolds yet? They do this type of work and they do it well.
Old 03-16-2004, 09:36 AM
  #34  
dholly
Registered User
 
dholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I understand what you are saying, then that would require a new lower manifold as well. This design only replaces the upper manifold.
Sorry about the pic quality, but, doesn't this replace both upper and lower intake manifold collector?
Attached Thumbnails SSR Engineering Intake Manifold *Pics*-manifold-connector.jpg  
Old 03-16-2004, 01:03 PM
  #35  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"Don't point fingers"? Dude I'm just letting this guy know that there are people on this board that know what happened on other boards for some of their other applications. What happened to the B15 community was not cool. I want to make sure this doesn't happen again here. As for stuff that was happening that no ones knows about..I can find multiple threads where the story changed as to "what happened". Hopefully everything works out here. I know i will not be buying anything from them.
Old 03-16-2004, 02:29 PM
  #36  
teh215
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
teh215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Posts: 5,753
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally posted by dholly
Sorry about the pic quality, but, doesn't this replace both upper and lower intake manifold collector?
There is a lower manifold that connect the 2 piece collector to the heads ....
Old 03-16-2004, 03:11 PM
  #37  
dholly
Registered User
 
dholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Right - what the manual refers to as intake manifold. When people use diff terms for the same part my pea brain gets confused. Here's a better pic of the manifold collector.
Attached Thumbnails SSR Engineering Intake Manifold *Pics*-manifold-collector.jpg  
Old 03-16-2004, 03:29 PM
  #38  
ZU L8R
Viper Sellout
iTrader: (84)
 
ZU L8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 6,871
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Is there a price estimate?
Old 03-16-2004, 03:41 PM
  #39  
PhoenixINX
Registered User
 
PhoenixINX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by 350z_taquito
yes, or just incorporate everything into one manifold w/ longer runners.
lengthen those runners and kiss your topend goodbye.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
11-09-2020 10:27 AM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
04-04-2016 07:52 AM
Fixxxercask
Engine
6
11-09-2015 11:10 AM



Quick Reply: SSR Engineering Intake Manifold *Pics*



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 AM.