SCC article: Borla exhaust flows better, makes no power
I saw that article about the vortech. they didnt even tune the damn thing, no wonder it only spit out 80wheel. They shoulda taken that thing to a tuner to fix up the fuel and get much better numbers than the wimpy one's they got. On a side note im stuck on 91, but I also run pig rich with my N/A mods. Only difference is im at altitude.
Originally posted by Vash350Z
the Z was built to run 93 octane, not 91, thats why they are having trouble making power. As stated before, they are having this problem with all their current project cars. STi, SRT4, EVO and Z, none of the mods they put on them make anywhere close to what they are supposed to because of the **** gas.
the Z was built to run 93 octane, not 91, thats why they are having trouble making power. As stated before, they are having this problem with all their current project cars. STi, SRT4, EVO and Z, none of the mods they put on them make anywhere close to what they are supposed to because of the **** gas.
it should affect a highly modified turbocharged car MORE than
a near stock naturally aspirated car. Instead, it seems to be
the other way around with the 350Z/G35 according to some
folks who keep bringing up the 91 octane issue.
If you look at dynos, on a turbo car, instead of getting 20 hp from
an exhaust, you only get 15 hp due to 91 octane.
Whereas on the 350Z/G35, instead of getting 15 hp from an
exhaust, you get 0-5hp...
Look at the advertised HP ratings that are supposedly based
on dyno tests from the manufacturer's homepages (Borla, Stillen,
etc). Then look at the real life numbers people are getting on
the dyno.
I'm just not used to dumping thousands of dollars into
"performance" mods and not gaining much hp, that's all.
Originally posted by TimeAttack
Correct. 91 octane is bad for making power on all cars, but
it should affect a highly modified turbocharged car MORE than
a near stock naturally aspirated car. Instead, it seems to be
the other way around with the 350Z/G35 according to some
folks who keep bringing up the 91 octane issue.
If you look at dynos, on a turbo car, instead of getting 20 hp from
an exhaust, you only get 15 hp due to 91 octane.
Whereas on the 350Z/G35, instead of getting 15 hp from an
exhaust, you get 0-5hp...
Look at the advertised HP ratings that are supposedly based
on dyno tests from the manufacturer's homepages (Borla, Stillen,
etc). Then look at the real life numbers people are getting on
the dyno.
I'm just not used to dumping thousands of dollars into
"performance" mods and not gaining much hp, that's all.
Correct. 91 octane is bad for making power on all cars, but
it should affect a highly modified turbocharged car MORE than
a near stock naturally aspirated car. Instead, it seems to be
the other way around with the 350Z/G35 according to some
folks who keep bringing up the 91 octane issue.
If you look at dynos, on a turbo car, instead of getting 20 hp from
an exhaust, you only get 15 hp due to 91 octane.
Whereas on the 350Z/G35, instead of getting 15 hp from an
exhaust, you get 0-5hp...
Look at the advertised HP ratings that are supposedly based
on dyno tests from the manufacturer's homepages (Borla, Stillen,
etc). Then look at the real life numbers people are getting on
the dyno.
I'm just not used to dumping thousands of dollars into
"performance" mods and not gaining much hp, that's all.
Now on a tuned TT install the A/F is tuned richer to accomodate the boost. So if properly tuned the freer flowing exhaust is less likely to cause the ECU to pull "addtional" timing.
there are very very few impartial dynos that prove any performance improvement with any aftermarket exhaust. you got one? oh... no? guess not.
the common experience with a z is to dyno over and over and at best run see a slight hp gain at WOT, and a torque and hp loss in the low end. this is while running *whatever gas with *whatever variable... then *whatever personal opinion added to it. the bottom line is that you can't do much improvement on something that's near perfect. the stock z exhaust is tuned very well.
all that said, FI can see improvements opening up exhausts on all kinds of cars that otherwise the same mod would degrade performance. rx7s, civics, accords... all of these cars can benefit greatly from 3" pipes while boosted, but would absolutely kill it otherwise if N/A. wow.
the common experience with a z is to dyno over and over and at best run see a slight hp gain at WOT, and a torque and hp loss in the low end. this is while running *whatever gas with *whatever variable... then *whatever personal opinion added to it. the bottom line is that you can't do much improvement on something that's near perfect. the stock z exhaust is tuned very well.
all that said, FI can see improvements opening up exhausts on all kinds of cars that otherwise the same mod would degrade performance. rx7s, civics, accords... all of these cars can benefit greatly from 3" pipes while boosted, but would absolutely kill it otherwise if N/A. wow.
Originally posted by mrZeee
backpressure ("less flow") does add to some of a cars torque figure...so if it flows better ("less backpressure") may reduce some torque/power
backpressure ("less flow") does add to some of a cars torque figure...so if it flows better ("less backpressure") may reduce some torque/power
Backpressure = bad
Over sized pipes = bad
proper length and size pipe for the application = good.
If the Borla system is over sized for the NA motor, loss in gas velocity will reduce scavenging, this reduces "on cam" power.
Lets all keep in mind the Z was designed to be a LEV and ULEV, depending on year, and the motor to last 200k miles. The factory is gonna do everything they can to meet that goal. I think the key to making more NA power is locked up in the computer.
Chris
Originally posted by HyperSprite
It's the backpressure myth again...
Backpressure = bad
Over sized pipes = bad
proper length and size pipe for the application = good.
If the Borla system is over sized for the NA motor, loss in gas velocity will reduce scavenging, this reduces "on cam" power.
Lets all keep in mind the Z was designed to be a LEV and ULEV, depending on year, and the motor to last 200k miles. The factory is gonna do everything they can to meet that goal. I think the key to making more NA power is locked up in the computer.
Chris
It's the backpressure myth again...
Backpressure = bad
Over sized pipes = bad
proper length and size pipe for the application = good.
If the Borla system is over sized for the NA motor, loss in gas velocity will reduce scavenging, this reduces "on cam" power.
Lets all keep in mind the Z was designed to be a LEV and ULEV, depending on year, and the motor to last 200k miles. The factory is gonna do everything they can to meet that goal. I think the key to making more NA power is locked up in the computer.
Chris
So for anyone expecting gain from CAT removal (on 91 pump) , the ECU should be modified to alleviate the lean condition. Of course this whole process is illegal in Cali, but I won't tell if you don't
[/B][/QUOTE]
How about with 93 octane (that's what I run)? No timing problem? Just curious about your findings.
[/B][/QUOTE] How about with 93 octane (that's what I run)? No timing problem? Just curious about your findings.
Don't know for sure, but it is much less likely for the OEM ECU to pull timing even with CATS removed. Those 2 pts make a world of diff, since the ECU trys diligently to keep the engine on the verge of detnation for efficeny reasons and it is designed for 91 out of the can.
Originally posted by maserom
SCC is crap. Primedia is known for kissing *** for advertisers only. Their magazines are all fluf. I gained 13 hp dyno proven by the exhaust.
SCC is crap. Primedia is known for kissing *** for advertisers only. Their magazines are all fluf. I gained 13 hp dyno proven by the exhaust.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Justin100
Intake Exhaust
26
Nov 29, 2015 03:58 PM
Extreme Dimensions
Southern California
0
Sep 24, 2015 03:35 PM





