Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

SCC article: Borla exhaust flows better, makes no power

Old Sep 23, 2004 | 06:54 AM
  #21  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

I saw that article about the vortech. they didnt even tune the damn thing, no wonder it only spit out 80wheel. They shoulda taken that thing to a tuner to fix up the fuel and get much better numbers than the wimpy one's they got. On a side note im stuck on 91, but I also run pig rich with my N/A mods. Only difference is im at altitude.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 08:52 AM
  #22  
TimeAttack's Avatar
TimeAttack
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default hmmm

Originally posted by Vash350Z
the Z was built to run 93 octane, not 91, thats why they are having trouble making power. As stated before, they are having this problem with all their current project cars. STi, SRT4, EVO and Z, none of the mods they put on them make anywhere close to what they are supposed to because of the **** gas.
Correct. 91 octane is bad for making power on all cars, but
it should affect a highly modified turbocharged car MORE than
a near stock naturally aspirated car. Instead, it seems to be
the other way around with the 350Z/G35 according to some
folks who keep bringing up the 91 octane issue.

If you look at dynos, on a turbo car, instead of getting 20 hp from
an exhaust, you only get 15 hp due to 91 octane.

Whereas on the 350Z/G35, instead of getting 15 hp from an
exhaust, you get 0-5hp...

Look at the advertised HP ratings that are supposedly based
on dyno tests from the manufacturer's homepages (Borla, Stillen,
etc). Then look at the real life numbers people are getting on
the dyno.

I'm just not used to dumping thousands of dollars into
"performance" mods and not gaining much hp, that's all.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 10:35 AM
  #23  
G3po's Avatar
G3po
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal.
Default Re: hmmm

Originally posted by TimeAttack
Correct. 91 octane is bad for making power on all cars, but
it should affect a highly modified turbocharged car MORE than
a near stock naturally aspirated car. Instead, it seems to be
the other way around with the 350Z/G35 according to some
folks who keep bringing up the 91 octane issue.

If you look at dynos, on a turbo car, instead of getting 20 hp from
an exhaust, you only get 15 hp due to 91 octane.

Whereas on the 350Z/G35, instead of getting 15 hp from an
exhaust, you get 0-5hp...

Look at the advertised HP ratings that are supposedly based
on dyno tests from the manufacturer's homepages (Borla, Stillen,
etc). Then look at the real life numbers people are getting on
the dyno.

I'm just not used to dumping thousands of dollars into
"performance" mods and not gaining much hp, that's all.
There is a good reason why the delta gain on a NA vs TT setup is flipped. The reason 91 pump and a free flow exhuast may gain little is due to a "mid band lean" conditon which results in slight knock , which causes the OEM ECU to pull timing on the NA setup.

Now on a tuned TT install the A/F is tuned richer to accomodate the boost. So if properly tuned the freer flowing exhaust is less likely to cause the ECU to pull "addtional" timing.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 10:50 AM
  #24  
sausage5000's Avatar
sausage5000
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: south florida
Default

there are very very few impartial dynos that prove any performance improvement with any aftermarket exhaust. you got one? oh... no? guess not.

the common experience with a z is to dyno over and over and at best run see a slight hp gain at WOT, and a torque and hp loss in the low end. this is while running *whatever gas with *whatever variable... then *whatever personal opinion added to it. the bottom line is that you can't do much improvement on something that's near perfect. the stock z exhaust is tuned very well.

all that said, FI can see improvements opening up exhausts on all kinds of cars that otherwise the same mod would degrade performance. rx7s, civics, accords... all of these cars can benefit greatly from 3" pipes while boosted, but would absolutely kill it otherwise if N/A. wow.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 12:40 PM
  #25  
HyperSprite's Avatar
HyperSprite
Mad Scientist
Premier Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Originally posted by mrZeee
backpressure ("less flow") does add to some of a cars torque figure...so if it flows better ("less backpressure") may reduce some torque/power
It's the backpressure myth again...
Backpressure = bad
Over sized pipes = bad
proper length and size pipe for the application = good.

If the Borla system is over sized for the NA motor, loss in gas velocity will reduce scavenging, this reduces "on cam" power.


Lets all keep in mind the Z was designed to be a LEV and ULEV, depending on year, and the motor to last 200k miles. The factory is gonna do everything they can to meet that goal. I think the key to making more NA power is locked up in the computer.

Chris
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 12:53 PM
  #26  
G3po's Avatar
G3po
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal.
Default exhaust

Originally posted by HyperSprite
It's the backpressure myth again...
Backpressure = bad
Over sized pipes = bad
proper length and size pipe for the application = good.

If the Borla system is over sized for the NA motor, loss in gas velocity will reduce scavenging, this reduces "on cam" power.


Lets all keep in mind the Z was designed to be a LEV and ULEV, depending on year, and the motor to last 200k miles. The factory is gonna do everything they can to meet that goal. I think the key to making more NA power is locked up in the computer.

Chris
One thing is sure the OEM CATs don't help exhast gas scavenge and they are the main restriction . But if they are removed or reduced to HFs ,a lean mid band condition can occur , which will cause the ECU to pull timing . So for anyone expecting gain from CAT removal (on 91 pump) , the ECU should be modified to alleviate the lean condition. Of course this whole process is illegal in Cali, but I won't tell if you don't
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 01:38 PM
  #27  
jjellyneck's Avatar
jjellyneck
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
Default Re: exhaust

So for anyone expecting gain from CAT removal (on 91 pump) , the ECU should be modified to alleviate the lean condition. Of course this whole process is illegal in Cali, but I won't tell if you don't [/B][/QUOTE]
How about with 93 octane (that's what I run)? No timing problem? Just curious about your findings.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 02:16 PM
  #28  
G3po's Avatar
G3po
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal.
Default 93

Don't know for sure, but it is much less likely for the OEM ECU to pull timing even with CATS removed. Those 2 pts make a world of diff, since the ECU trys diligently to keep the engine on the verge of detnation for efficeny reasons and it is designed for 91 out of the can.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2004 | 05:59 PM
  #29  
maserom's Avatar
maserom
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Marina Del Rey CA
Default

SCC is crap. Primedia is known for kissing *** for advertisers only. Their magazines are all fluf. I gained 13 hp dyno proven by the exhaust.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 11:11 PM
  #30  
ihatethatbobbarker's Avatar
ihatethatbobbarker
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, California
Default

borlas an advertizer, wouldnt they be pissing off their advertizer. nice theory though.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 06:20 AM
  #31  
DomingoChavez's Avatar
DomingoChavez
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Rainbow 6 HQ
Default

Originally posted by maserom
SCC is crap. Primedia is known for kissing *** for advertisers only. Their magazines are all fluf. I gained 13 hp dyno proven by the exhaust.
Thanks for the info man. Anyone else have before/after dynos with this exhaust????
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hulkout
370Z Brakes & Suspension
7
Apr 28, 2017 09:00 PM
Justin100
Intake Exhaust
26
Nov 29, 2015 03:58 PM
codek
Intake Exhaust
11
Sep 28, 2015 03:03 AM
Extreme Dimensions
Southern California
0
Sep 24, 2015 03:35 PM
jsunly
Intake Exhaust
7
Sep 19, 2015 01:22 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31 PM.