update?

 

Got Nada. Have not had the time to start m ECU hack project.

It will happen though

 

I never said anything in my posts about "pulling by several car lengths", that was someone else. I also didn't say that was a viable measurement of the difference the ECU reflash makes. I only talked of idle issues and how I think the ECU helps those issues as well as getting the most out of the mods. I think the ECU reflash makes a huge difference in my paticular case and I believe in the product because of the results I have seen.

I suggest that if you want to know the "quantitative differences" between AAM's reflash and Technosquare's reflash ask them. The people at Technosquare were very willing to discuss my questions about the reflash with me. I also went on the recommendation of Doug at Crawford Z to get the reflash because significant R&D between Crawford and Technosquare went into the reflash specifically for the Crawford products (headers, cats and plenum). They went through multiple reflashes before Doug got it like he wanted. As for dyno numbers ask them for those too. They might even be willing to use your car to get those numbers.

It appears from your post that you have an ECU reflash. Which one? What are your mods? Do you not think that it makes any difference? What kind of research did you do before you got it?

 

I wrote about pulling several car lengths. But that is a very good measure as I had stated the races were against the same car vs the same driver multiple times so there aren't "too many variables introduced with the driver." And when results are so consistent with so little variables, it's hard to deny they are good proof.

However, my results aren't AAM VS TS but that also doesn't matter to me, as I got the AAM reflash for $350 (I believe). So I'm happy