Notices
Motorsports The Z in its Natural Habitat

Killed a 2002 Mustang GT Manual

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 01:23 PM
  #1  
Oh4aZ's Avatar
Oh4aZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default Tweaked the Ecu & Killed a 2002 Mustang GT Manual

Last Saturday night, I am at a local meet and this guy comes up to me and asks me if he wants to race. He mentioned that he just raced a 350z the night before and it was dead even. So I say sure.

The first run was from a 10 MPH roll to 100 MPH. I absolutely kill him by 5 car lengths.

The second run was from a stop. Beat him again, but not as bad -- by about 4 car lengths.

I wish I had a picture of his face after we pulled over. "WHAT IN THE WORLD DID YOU DO TO YOUR CAR!!!". Before we raced, he never thought to ask if I was modded. If he asked, I would have told him that I have Stillen Exhaust, Injen CAI and tweaked ECU

I really want to find a Mustang Bullitt to race now

I will be taking my car to the track on March 30 (provided there isn't any snow). I am hoping to run somewhere between a 14.4 - 14.6. At 6,000 feet elevation, that is not bad for a 350Z. The general rule of thumb is add .15 seconds for every 1,000 feet to your quarter mile time from the base sea level times.

Last edited by Oh4aZ; Mar 19, 2003 at 02:06 PM.
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 01:59 PM
  #2  
ACEMAN's Avatar
ACEMAN
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown MD
Default

Nice Kill


What have you tweaked on your ECU??

Later
Aceman
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 02:02 PM
  #3  
Oh4aZ's Avatar
Oh4aZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

air/fuel mixture is more lean and timing is advanced by 5 degrees.
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 02:06 PM
  #4  
ACEMAN's Avatar
ACEMAN
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown MD
Default

Originally posted by Oh4aZ
air/fuel mixture is more lean and timing is advanced by 5 degrees.
Im not real familar with messing with the air/fuel mixture and the timing. Could you explain it for me in more detail how it is done. And what kind of gains do you think you get with this.

Thanks

later
Aceman
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 02:14 PM
  #5  
Oh4aZ's Avatar
Oh4aZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Well, I am lucky. An acquaintance of mine has the "Consult" device which is the device used to program the ECU. He plugged it in and made the adjustments.

Here is a printout of the settings:

Corrected IGN TIM: 5 degrees
ENG SPEED: 838 RPM
Corrected IDL RPM: 175 RPM
COOLAN TEMP/S: 192 Degrees farenheit
CLSD THL POS: ON
IGN TIMING: 17BTDC

The results is better low end due to the more lean air/fuel mixture and a lot better top end due to the advanced timing.

Last edited by Oh4aZ; Mar 19, 2003 at 02:38 PM.
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 03:44 PM
  #6  
JamRWS6's Avatar
JamRWS6
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

If you lean it out too much you will blow your motor. Just a FYI

Good kill
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 03:59 PM
  #7  
Oh4aZ's Avatar
Oh4aZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

My apologies, I mis-stated something. The ECU wasn't modified until two days after I ran the Mustang. It would be interesting to run him again!
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 04:23 PM
  #8  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 1
From: West suburbs of Chi-town
Default

Originally posted by JamRWS6
If you lean it out too much you will blow your motor. Just a FYI

Good kill

The 350Z's VQ is WAY rich from the factory, you should have smelled my exhaust after my dyno pulls 2 weeks ago. I don't think leaning out the A/F mixture with a consult device would lean the mixture enough to possibly destory the motor.
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 05:05 PM
  #9  
Caswell's Avatar
Caswell
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Novi, MI
Default

Never mind...
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 09:36 PM
  #10  
EnthusiastZ's Avatar
EnthusiastZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

Originally posted by Oh4aZ
Well, I am lucky. An acquaintance of mine has the "Consult" device which is the device used to program the ECU. He plugged it in and made the adjustments.

Here is a printout of the settings:

Corrected IGN TIM: 5 degrees
ENG SPEED: 838 RPM
Corrected IDL RPM: 175 RPM
COOLAN TEMP/S: 192 Degrees farenheit
CLSD THL POS: ON
IGN TIMING: 17BTDC

Hmmm...is your aquaintance a Nissan Tech?
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 06:03 AM
  #11  
Oh4aZ's Avatar
Oh4aZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Originally posted by EnthusiastZ
Hmmm...is your aquaintance a Nissan Tech?
Yes -- Nissan Master Technician
Old Mar 26, 2003 | 10:27 PM
  #13  
hfm's Avatar
hfm
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,527
Likes: 1
From: The Val
Default Re: Tweaked the Ecu & Killed a 2002 Mustang GT Manual

Originally posted by Oh4aZ
The first run was from a 10 MPH roll to 100 MPH. I absolutely kill him by 5 car lengths.

The second run was from a stop. Beat him again, but not as bad -- by about 4 car lengths.
Are you sure? 4 or 5 car lengths on a Mustang GT is huge. I like to think I'm a good driver and that I'm pretty quick. But, there is no way I could pull 4 or 5 car lengths against a decent driver in a Mustang GT. I could see 1 or 2. 4 or 5 is sounding like...well for lack of a better phrase, ********. So, the question is, you sure it was a Mustang GT and if so, was it a late model?
Old Mar 26, 2003 | 10:35 PM
  #14  
Oh4aZ's Avatar
Oh4aZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default Re: Re: Tweaked the Ecu & Killed a 2002 Mustang GT Manual

Originally posted by hfm
Are you sure? 4 or 5 car lengths on a Mustang GT is huge. I like to think I'm a good driver and that I'm pretty quick. But, there is no way I could pull 4 or 5 car lengths against a decent driver in a Mustang GT. I could see 1 or 2. 4 or 5 is sounding like...well for lack of a better phrase, ********. So, the question is, you sure it was a Mustang GT and if so, was it a late model?
Yes, I am 100% absolutely positive. I was talking to the guy before and after the race. With the mods that I have, not sure why you think that is bs??? He runs a 14.89 at the track and I am expecting mid 14's, low 14's if I am lucky, so that equates to about 4-5 cars difference.
Old Mar 26, 2003 | 10:40 PM
  #15  
hfm's Avatar
hfm
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,527
Likes: 1
From: The Val
Default Re: Re: Re: Tweaked the Ecu & Killed a 2002 Mustang GT Manual

Originally posted by Oh4aZ
Yes, I am 100% absolutely positive. I was talking to the guy before and after the race. With the mods that I have, not sure why you think that is bs??? He runs a 14.89 at the track and I am expecting mid 14's, low 14's if I am lucky, so that equates to about 4-5 cars difference.
I dunno man. I haven't raced a Mustang GT in my Z yet but if that car is anything remotely close to the Camaros I've raced, I have a hard time seeing 4 or 5 car lengths. That's a lot of distance.

I'm not saying it's BS cause frankly I don't know. But, the Mustang GTs I've seen are pretty quick and I have a hard time seeing myself taking one by that much distance. If you did it's all good but it just seems like a lot.
Old Mar 26, 2003 | 11:45 PM
  #16  
krinkov's Avatar
krinkov
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 1
From: San Fran
Default

well if you mean just a regular GT, not a bullit or cobra, than this is about right on. Road and Track lists the 260hp GT as pulling a 14.7 sec 1/4mi. Figuring the drag rule of thumb that every tenth is a car legnth, a Z running 14.2 should be 5 legnths no sweat.
Old Mar 27, 2003 | 12:20 AM
  #17  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 1
From: West suburbs of Chi-town
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Tweaked the Ecu & Killed a 2002 Mustang GT Manual

Originally posted by hfm
I dunno man. I haven't raced a Mustang GT in my Z yet but if that car is anything remotely close to the Camaros I've raced, I have a hard time seeing 4 or 5 car lengths.
LS1 camaro = 290-305whp STOCK
Mustang GT = 220-230whp STOCK

not even REMOTELY close....
Old Mar 27, 2003 | 10:23 AM
  #18  
M Powered's Avatar
M Powered
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Yea I think 4-5 cars is A LOT; especially if you both were starting out at 10mph roll. For you to put that much distance on a new GT Mustang would take a lot more power than what you are putting down now, I guarantee that!

I know Mustang GT's stock are dogs but they are not that slow.

I put about 4-5 cars on a slightly modded GT from a dead stop and I can put about a little over 2 1/2 cars on a 350Z. That is from a stop, from a roll, give and take a car or so.
Old Mar 27, 2003 | 10:38 AM
  #19  
AngelGT2000's Avatar
AngelGT2000
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl
Default Re: Tweaked the Ecu & Killed a 2002 Mustang GT Manual

Originally posted by Oh4aZ
[B]I really want to find a Mustang Bullitt to race now
It ain't a Bullitt, but i'll be your huckleberry.

Good kill, but street racing don't mean jack. When and if you make it out to the track, make sure you let us in on your times.
Old Mar 27, 2003 | 10:47 AM
  #20  
Oh4aZ's Avatar
Oh4aZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default Re: Re: Tweaked the Ecu & Killed a 2002 Mustang GT Manual

Originally posted by AngelGT2000
It ain't a Bullitt, but i'll be your huckleberry.

Good kill, but street racing don't mean jack. When and if you make it out to the track, make sure you let us in on your times.
Well, obviously, that is a matter of opinion. Depends on where you do most of your racing



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:32 AM.