F**king SRT4
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
F**king SRT4
Driving down 684 in NY today. Some dude in an Red SRT4 pulls along side me. No cars around so we slow to about 40MPH. He honks his horn, on the 3rd honk we go. F**K!! I couldn't shake him. Those cars are fast!!!! We went all the way to 130 then we hit traffic! He stayed with me the whole time.
I need MODS!!!!! I can't believe a Dodge almost had me! Much respect for those cars now.
I need MODS!!!!! I can't believe a Dodge almost had me! Much respect for those cars now.
#2
These posts kill me. :-) It is no secret that the Neon SRT-4 is one heck of a performance deal. They go fast in a straight-line and reasonably fast in turns. I have owned a number of cars like that and took great pleasure in beating 'superior' cars in drag races (my 200SX SE-R, NX2000, and WRX are similar examples). One thing I *hated* was FWD. Numb steering and tons of torque-steer are no fun. Those things are especially true of the new Neon but for around $20K what do you expect? :-) I won't even get into just how wretched the build quality and interior materials are. So, they are fast and wait until you see folks running even a little more boost (not to mention a bigger more efficient inter-cooler or larger turbo!). SCC Magazine recently dyno tested one that makes more HP to the wheels than is rated 'to the brochure'. It seems pretty obvious that Dodge has chosen to understate their HP (not new either -- VW did/does it with their 1.8t motors). Many companies do this so the stated HP doesn't interfere with the sales in something slightly 'up market' and cause competition within the make. If you insist on racing these creatures, do so from a light -- roll-ons in high-horsepower FWDs puts them in *THEIR* element. :-)
#5
Re: F**king SRT4
Originally posted by The Owner
Driving down 684 in NY today. Some dude in an Red SRT4 pulls along side me. No cars around so we slow to about 40MPH. He honks his horn, on the 3rd honk we go. F**K!! I couldn't shake him. Those cars are fast!!!! We went all the way to 130 then we hit traffic! He stayed with me the whole time.
I need MODS!!!!! I can't believe a Dodge almost had me! Much respect for those cars now.
Driving down 684 in NY today. Some dude in an Red SRT4 pulls along side me. No cars around so we slow to about 40MPH. He honks his horn, on the 3rd honk we go. F**K!! I couldn't shake him. Those cars are fast!!!! We went all the way to 130 then we hit traffic! He stayed with me the whole time.
I need MODS!!!!! I can't believe a Dodge almost had me! Much respect for those cars now.
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Landbarger
Would you have believed it if a Viper almost had you?
Would you have believed it if a Viper almost had you?
I know that the Viper is a much faster car than our cars.
If I had enough money I would be driving an '03 Viper.
#7
Originally posted by The Owner
Ah, yes. I knew this afternoon when I re-read my post that some bone head would bring up the Viper because I said "Dodge".
I know that the Viper is a much faster car than our cars.
If I had enough money I would be driving an '03 Viper.
Ah, yes. I knew this afternoon when I re-read my post that some bone head would bring up the Viper because I said "Dodge".
I know that the Viper is a much faster car than our cars.
If I had enough money I would be driving an '03 Viper.
Trending Topics
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by state
These posts kill me. :-) It is no secret that the Neon SRT-4 is one heck of a performance deal. They go fast in a straight-line and reasonably fast in turns. I have owned a number of cars like that and took great pleasure in beating 'superior' cars in drag races (my 200SX SE-R, NX2000, and WRX are similar examples). One thing I *hated* was FWD. Numb steering and tons of torque-steer are no fun. Those things are especially true of the new Neon but for around $20K what do you expect? :-) I won't even get into just how wretched the build quality and interior materials are. So, they are fast and wait until you see folks running even a little more boost (not to mention a bigger more efficient inter-cooler or larger turbo!). SCC Magazine recently dyno tested one that makes more HP to the wheels than is rated 'to the brochure'. It seems pretty obvious that Dodge has chosen to understate their HP (not new either -- VW did/does it with their 1.8t motors). Many companies do this so the stated HP doesn't interfere with the sales in something slightly 'up market' and cause competition within the make. If you insist on racing these creatures, do so from a light -- roll-ons in high-horsepower FWDs puts them in *THEIR* element. :-)
These posts kill me. :-) It is no secret that the Neon SRT-4 is one heck of a performance deal. They go fast in a straight-line and reasonably fast in turns. I have owned a number of cars like that and took great pleasure in beating 'superior' cars in drag races (my 200SX SE-R, NX2000, and WRX are similar examples). One thing I *hated* was FWD. Numb steering and tons of torque-steer are no fun. Those things are especially true of the new Neon but for around $20K what do you expect? :-) I won't even get into just how wretched the build quality and interior materials are. So, they are fast and wait until you see folks running even a little more boost (not to mention a bigger more efficient inter-cooler or larger turbo!). SCC Magazine recently dyno tested one that makes more HP to the wheels than is rated 'to the brochure'. It seems pretty obvious that Dodge has chosen to understate their HP (not new either -- VW did/does it with their 1.8t motors). Many companies do this so the stated HP doesn't interfere with the sales in something slightly 'up market' and cause competition within the make. If you insist on racing these creatures, do so from a light -- roll-ons in high-horsepower FWDs puts them in *THEIR* element. :-)
#11
FWD
I had a NX 2000 also! It was the non t-top model. Great track car. The one thing I like about FWD is when you get into trouble just mash the gas!! Puts you right back in line.
I loved my NX2000 and 200SX SE-R but would never describe them as sports cars though they were plenty fast. Enjoy your ride and don't sweat those guys.
#12
It's no secret that I really like the neon. Yah. Take one from a light and unless he's good you're in luck. It's definately a tire shredder in the wrong hands. Sleepers are so awesome. A guy in my car club owns this monstrocity. Feast your eyes on HORANGE...... 12.5
#15
Everyone I'm sure saw the SCC where they dyno'd a stock SRT4 that put 223 to the wheels. and it's rated at 215 at the fly wheel from the factory. Those things are monsters. I think I saw a 1/4 mile of a 14.0 @ something stupid like 105mph. Can we say traction limited. Fast as it may be I'd take the Mazdaspeed Protege over it any day of the week. (speaking in terms of similar cars)
#16
Re: FWD
Originally posted by state
I guess it depends how you 'got into trouble'. Going into a turn too hot in a FWD car, and you have to RELEASE the accelerator to get your line back (late/trail braking work too). That is about the only way to make many FWD cars rotate at all. Otherwise, it is all about TERMINAL UNDERSTEER. Some shining examples of steller FWD handlers: NX2000/SE-R (and almost any SR20DE powered car), RSX, Focus/Contour SVT, and Integras. But, all those cars push like a mother w/o some suspension work and careful driving. Healthy doses of torque / bump steer there too.
I loved my NX2000 and 200SX SE-R but would never describe them as sports cars though they were plenty fast. Enjoy your ride and don't sweat those guys.
I guess it depends how you 'got into trouble'. Going into a turn too hot in a FWD car, and you have to RELEASE the accelerator to get your line back (late/trail braking work too). That is about the only way to make many FWD cars rotate at all. Otherwise, it is all about TERMINAL UNDERSTEER. Some shining examples of steller FWD handlers: NX2000/SE-R (and almost any SR20DE powered car), RSX, Focus/Contour SVT, and Integras. But, all those cars push like a mother w/o some suspension work and careful driving. Healthy doses of torque / bump steer there too.
I loved my NX2000 and 200SX SE-R but would never describe them as sports cars though they were plenty fast. Enjoy your ride and don't sweat those guys.
#17
Preludes (SH), FWD, and driving pleasure
Yes, the current generation Preludes handle very nicely (almost all Preludes did)! In fact, they won C&D's best handing car for under $30K last year. In that test, the SH's special function failed and performed as a 'regular' model - but rather nicely. I didn't mention it because it costs WAY more than the other examples for the most part (esp consider used after-market). Anyhow, that was (is) Honda's flag-ship FWD sports coupe. If you insist on a FWD car for the sake of having one, then many import cars will do nicely. For me all the Honda technology doesn't make up for it's weight (deserves the "Qualude" nick IMO). I've seen those cars respond really well to mods but at the end of the day, it is still FWD and not a 'real' sports car. I've spent a lot of time thinking about this recently and realized how little of the subjective feeling makes it into a post like this. I mean the 'texture' of driving a Z is incredible. I have to remember that I should drive my WRX and ride my motorcyle more often, but don't. :-) Anyhow a number of cars give me the same kind of driving pleasure but at costs more than I was willing to pay. Some examples are the new M3 (M Coupes), the 996 Porsche, Z06 'Vette, and the Acura NSX.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Preludes (SH), FWD, and driving pleasure
Originally posted by state
Yes, the current generation Preludes handle very nicely (almost all Preludes did)! In fact, they won C&D's best handing car for under $30K last year. In that test, the SH's special function failed and performed as a 'regular' model - but rather nicely. I didn't mention it because it costs WAY more than the other examples for the most part (esp consider used after-market). Anyhow, that was (is) Honda's flag-ship FWD sports coupe. If you insist on a FWD car for the sake of having one, then many import cars will do nicely. For me all the Honda technology doesn't make up for it's weight (deserves the "Qualude" nick IMO). I've seen those cars respond really well to mods but at the end of the day, it is still FWD and not a 'real' sports car. I've spent a lot of time thinking about this recently and realized how little of the subjective feeling makes it into a post like this. I mean the 'texture' of driving a Z is incredible. I have to remember that I should drive my WRX and ride my motorcyle more often, but don't. :-) Anyhow a number of cars give me the same kind of driving pleasure but at costs more than I was willing to pay. Some examples are the new M3 (M Coupes),
the 996 Porsche, Z06 'Vette, and the Acura NSX.
Yes, the current generation Preludes handle very nicely (almost all Preludes did)! In fact, they won C&D's best handing car for under $30K last year. In that test, the SH's special function failed and performed as a 'regular' model - but rather nicely. I didn't mention it because it costs WAY more than the other examples for the most part (esp consider used after-market). Anyhow, that was (is) Honda's flag-ship FWD sports coupe. If you insist on a FWD car for the sake of having one, then many import cars will do nicely. For me all the Honda technology doesn't make up for it's weight (deserves the "Qualude" nick IMO). I've seen those cars respond really well to mods but at the end of the day, it is still FWD and not a 'real' sports car. I've spent a lot of time thinking about this recently and realized how little of the subjective feeling makes it into a post like this. I mean the 'texture' of driving a Z is incredible. I have to remember that I should drive my WRX and ride my motorcyle more often, but don't. :-) Anyhow a number of cars give me the same kind of driving pleasure but at costs more than I was willing to pay. Some examples are the new M3 (M Coupes),
the 996 Porsche, Z06 'Vette, and the Acura NSX.
#19
RWD Alone Does Not a Sports Car Make
Re-read my post -- I never said every RWD car is a sports car. I also didn't say a FWD could not be fast. :-P But, this much is true: A FWD car will never be considerd a 'true' sports car. Up to around 300HP most FWDs are the equal to a RWD counter-part. Beyond that, time and again it has been shown they can't hang. From experience I can tell you my 200SX SE-R that made over 400HP to the wheels was NOT fun to drive most of time. Even with the best NISMO LSD, it would spin like mad and produce monstrous torque-steer. BTW I took enormous pleasure in stomping Corvette's, Mustangs, Porsches, and almost anything I could get my hands on! Once I even out-dragged a Ferrari 355F1! That was so much fun!
Anyhow, I did say that subjective feelings play a lot here -- and it is dang hard to quantify how terrible torque/bump steer are on most FWDs. BTW I drove the current generation B15 SE-R Spec-Vs -- nice torquey car and handles well. That sucker is NO sports car. The transmission is among the 10 worst (in terms of feel) in the free-world (other nine held by GM cars). :-P
Searl's 200 SX SE-R
I've run faster than 12.34 FYI -- that was on DOT rubber.
-Searl
Anyhow, I did say that subjective feelings play a lot here -- and it is dang hard to quantify how terrible torque/bump steer are on most FWDs. BTW I drove the current generation B15 SE-R Spec-Vs -- nice torquey car and handles well. That sucker is NO sports car. The transmission is among the 10 worst (in terms of feel) in the free-world (other nine held by GM cars). :-P
Searl's 200 SX SE-R
I've run faster than 12.34 FYI -- that was on DOT rubber.
-Searl
#20
Reaction Times...
Just a quick prophylactic message -- the times were you see a 1"+ reaction time were not in an actual race -- either single car or pure test event. :-) I tied for 1st place a few years ago in bracket racing in a sanctioned IDRA event. I ran three near perfect runs (.502, .505, .530) on a 'sports man tree' until my crew chief, Mike Kojima, got us disqualified.