Notices
Motorsports The Z in its Natural Habitat

Question for you V8 people (Stangs/Camaros etc..)

 
Old 06-11-2003, 04:34 AM
  #41  
CrazyBosnian
Registered User
 
CrazyBosnian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by D'oh
I've seen a couple people mention how the LS1 is less expensive than the VQ35, and I'm wondering where that data is coming from.


Now, considering that the Z's chassis is comparible to the vette (maybe slightly less balanced, but that's just the set-up, and not due to anything inherent in the design), I'm wondering what it is about the vette that makes it cost 40-45K? The vette is a great car, no doubt about it, but the only thing it has over the Z is the engine, which you guys are telling me is actually less expensive to make. Therefore the Vette seems like a pretty crappy deal in that context.



-D'oh!
First off, its a vette, and anyone in their right mind anywhere in the world would take a vette over a Z...No offence to anyone. The engine is less expensive, simply because its the old pushrod design, and u can find parts for it anywhere...You can get a brand new LS1 like said above or about 4-5k, check with you dealer how much a brand new VQ35 wil cost you...Oh, and if the LS1 had the technology invested in it of the VQ35 it would be making well over 450 hp...
CrazyBosnian is offline  
Old 06-11-2003, 04:44 AM
  #42  
Daytona Blue Z in Bo
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Daytona Blue Z in Bo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by CrazyBosnian
Oh, and if the LS1 had the technology invested in it of the VQ35 it would be making well over 450 hp...
Key word being "if"
Shoulda woulda coulda

Funny you say this after countless people were flaming people comparing how much HP a 5.7 liter Nissan engine would make and you say the same thing but in reverse
Daytona Blue Z in Bo is offline  
Old 06-11-2003, 04:47 AM
  #43  
BigBadBuford
Registered User
 
BigBadBuford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hummelstown, PA
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The comparisons of the V6's is sort of silly, since the Buick 3.8 V6 used in most of GM's cars was developed in the late '50s/early 60's. We should be comparing the VQ35DE to the new GM V6 that they just developed. The first version will be a 3.6L pushing out 255 hp - right with the Japanese engines, and these engines are slated to put out up to 380+ hp in turbocharged form.
When you start looking at V8s, American V8s put out similar power numbers to Japanese and German designs. Just look at Nissans new Titan truck - 5.6 liters and 300 hp/380 lbs. ft. torque - sounds a lot like the 5.3L LS1 derived motor in Chevy Trucks. Look at the LS6 - 405 hp/5.7L vs the M5 5L 394 hp. The M5 has everything, DOHC, 4 valves/cylinder, individual throttle bodies, variable valve timing, etc. and it only makes 7 more hp/L than the "antiquated" OHV 2-valve low tech LS6. And the LS6 gets better gas mileage to boot!
The other reasons manufacturers use large displacement engines with fairly low specific output is to get the one thing those high revving low displacement motors don't have - torque! When people are looking at a 'vette or a Camaro they are looking for torque, not an 9500 rpm redline, and the LS1 does a great job at making tons of torque and good HP numbers efficiently and for a low cost.
Attached Files
File Type: txt
blank.txt (5 Bytes, 27 views)
BigBadBuford is offline  
Old 06-11-2003, 06:14 AM
  #44  
Z06KILLR
Registered User
 
Z06KILLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Warren, Michigan
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Simp
First post, had to do it...

1. The reason nobody is impressed when he beats a V6 Camaro is because (ready for this) THEY AREN'T FAST. And...

2. Run what ya brung and hope you brung enough. It was said before: it's not my fault Nissan stuck a tricked out 3.5 V6 in the Z, so don't ***** when a 5.7 Liter (low-tech) V8 blows your doors off
Z06KILLR is offline  
Old 06-11-2003, 06:15 AM
  #45  
Z06KILLR
Registered User
 
Z06KILLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Warren, Michigan
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

double post...grrr

Last edited by Z06KILLR; 06-11-2003 at 06:28 AM.
Z06KILLR is offline  
Old 06-11-2003, 10:56 AM
  #46  
281cobra
Registered User
 
281cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by r34 racer
The fact of the matter is.... if an American and Japanese engine had the same displacement but each with their own respective engineering capabilites, the Japanese engine would have more HP/L than the American motor and therefore more HP. Im not saying the japanese engine will have 120hp/l but im sure it would have a higher ratio than the american one.
I can understand the hp per liter argument (engineering prowess ) but here in the good old U.S of A the only thing that matters on the street is HP PER CAR. If a Honda S2000 with a 2.0L 240 hp engine races a F-body with a 5.7L 320 hp engine (actually 350 hp) the Honda is going get it's *** kicked. Now I guess the Honda owner can console himself with the fact that he has the better engineered car but HE LOST THE ****ING RACE AND THAT'S THE BOTTOM LINE.

Now that's look at this so called import engineering prowess as it is applicable to the street, V8 vs V8. Infiniti makes a DOHC 4.5L that puts out 345 hp and Lexus has a DOHC 4.3L that puts out 300 hp and my 99 Cobra has a DOHC 4.6 that puts out 320 hp. Now add an aftermarket exhaust, CAI and underdrive pullies to my Cobra and you get almost 350 hp. So that means Ford is on par (engine wise) with import cars that cost twice as much. Now let's talk about BMW V8's. The M5 has a DOHC 5.0L that puts out 394 hp but Ford just came out with an DOHC 5.0L crate engine that puts out 425 hp. While it's true you can't get the Ford engine in a street car (yet). I can buy it and install it in my car myself and it will cost a hell of a lot cheaper than a 80,000 dollar M5.

Now I'm in no way saying my Cobra is better engineered than the cars listed above but I am saying my engine is on a engineering par with the engines listed above. And may I add for a hell of a lot less money.

Last edited by 281cobra; 06-11-2003 at 11:00 AM.
281cobra is offline  
Old 06-11-2003, 04:00 PM
  #47  
PacerX
Registered User
 
PacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"Oh, and if the LS1 had the technology invested in it of the VQ35 it would be making well over 450 hp..."

A cam alone will do 450hp on an LS6. No fancy-schmancy stuff needed. Oil her up and stab her in.
PacerX is offline  
Old 06-12-2003, 12:13 AM
  #48  
D'oh
Registered User
 
D'oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by CrazyBosnian
First off, its a vette, and anyone in their right mind anywhere in the world would take a vette over a Z...No offence to anyone. The engine is less expensive, simply because its the old pushrod design, and u can find parts for it anywhere...You can get a brand new LS1 like said above or about 4-5k, check with you dealer how much a brand new VQ35 wil cost you...Oh, and if the LS1 had the technology invested in it of the VQ35 it would be making well over 450 hp...
Perhaps I didn't explain myself well, but you completely missed/ignored my point.

I was not arguing about whether the vette is good or not, but rather, if the Vette's engine in only worth 5K, why is the rest of the car (which is basically the same as the Z) so much more expensive?

About people taking the vette over a Z, I agree if the vette was the same price, but since it costs significantly more, the Z will sell just about the same as the vette. In fact, I've read that the vette is not too popular in Europe because it costs around 60K for just the standard one, not the Z06. Therefore, I'm not sure how many people would "purchase" a vette over a Z. I know I'd like to purchase a Z06, but I got all this .com stock that's gotta go up first!

So I guess what I'm trying to say is this:
Combine the Z's platform and the LS1 engine and you have a sub 30K car with vette performance. Given what we know of the Z and the LS1 engine, a car like that should easily be profitable (even more profitable than the current Z if we are to believe the engine costs). Now, given that a vehicle like that is technically possible, and would be profitable, do any of you think a manufacturer has any interest in something like that? I'm hoping that the performance of the STI and EVO will bring RWD sports car prices down, but do you guys think it will happen? Will there be another Firebird/Camaro in GM's future, or a vairiant that is more sports car (2 seats and smaller) instead of muscle car?

-D'oh!
D'oh is offline  
Old 06-12-2003, 10:00 PM
  #49  
sukkoi19
Registered User
 
sukkoi19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Moline IL
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by D'oh
Perhaps I didn't explain myself well, but you completely missed/ignored my point.

I was not arguing about whether the vette is good or not, but rather, if the Vette's engine in only worth 5K, why is the rest of the car (which is basically the same as the Z) so much more expensive?

About people taking the vette over a Z, I agree if the vette was the same price, but since it costs significantly more, the Z will sell just about the same as the vette. In fact, I've read that the vette is not too popular in Europe because it costs around 60K for just the standard one, not the Z06. Therefore, I'm not sure how many people would "purchase" a vette over a Z. I know I'd like to purchase a Z06, but I got all this .com stock that's gotta go up first!

So I guess what I'm trying to say is this:
Combine the Z's platform and the LS1 engine and you have a sub 30K car with vette performance. Given what we know of the Z and the LS1 engine, a car like that should easily be profitable (even more profitable than the current Z if we are to believe the engine costs). Now, given that a vehicle like that is technically possible, and would be profitable, do any of you think a manufacturer has any interest in something like that? I'm hoping that the performance of the STI and EVO will bring RWD sports car prices down, but do you guys think it will happen? Will there be another Firebird/Camaro in GM's future, or a vairiant that is more sports car (2 seats and smaller) instead of muscle car?

-D'oh!
Your question can be answered in one word. Marketing. The Vette is the premier falgship of GMs line, therefore it commands a higher price. Hard top Vettes can be had for the upper 30s if you haggle enough.
sukkoi19 is offline  
Old 06-13-2003, 03:17 PM
  #50  
dj el run
Registered User
 
dj el run's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: san diego
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Corvette is the premier car of GM. All new technology first comes out in the vette, and it is their flagship car. GM could make a bunch of em and sell them in bulk for cheap, and while the car would be easily bought it would not be highly desired.

GM wants everyone growing up to think "when I make enough money I want to buy a vette and I will know I have made it in the world. I want to have status so when I drive down the street everyone will know I'm driving a 40k+ car."

If you have car knowledge, you could make a car run 10's for half the price of a new vette, or a 350z. That's not the point. You're buying the status that comes with the car, the fact that not everyone is driving one.
dj el run is offline  
Old 06-13-2003, 07:28 PM
  #51  
Steve98TransAm
Registered User
 
Steve98TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by dj el run
The Corvette is the premier car of GM. All new technology first comes out in the vette, and it is their flagship car. GM could make a bunch of em and sell them in bulk for cheap, and while the car would be easily bought it would not be highly desired.

GM wants everyone growing up to think "when I make enough money I want to buy a vette and I will know I have made it in the world. I want to have status so when I drive down the street everyone will know I'm driving a 40k+ car."

If you have car knowledge, you could make a car run 10's for half the price of a new vette, or a 350z. That's not the point. You're buying the status that comes with the car, the fact that not everyone is driving one.
Very well said man. I think you just summed up why the Corvette is so special.
Steve98TransAm is offline  
Old 06-13-2003, 08:04 PM
  #52  
r34 racer
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
r34 racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by Mr Payne
Welcome to the land of extreme ********. Street cars don't have any sort of displacement limit so you can't even make anything even remotely close to a logical argument.
Welcome to the land of extreme incomprehension. Nobody said anything about a displacement limit, and even if there was a mention of a displacement limit it WOULD NOT hinder my argument that japanese engines tend, in general, to make more use of given displacement.

Current engine statistics and trends were certainly the offspring of the political decisions within certain countries though. The fact that many European countries and Japan have taxes directly tied to displacements almost certainly governed the way automotive companies in those countries developed engines.
This is an astute observation, but is somewhat granted and most definitely tangential. Not to mention that it only bolsters my argument that SHOULD a japanese engine have the same displacement as an american engine, the japanese engine would inherently produce more power given equal amounts of fuel BECAUSE as you inferred, the japanese market demands efficiency because cheap resources are quite limited in Japan, whereas the general atmosphere in america is somewhat more 'extravagant' if you will.

Of course certain designs lend themselves to a higher specific output. Displacement isn't the end all be all of engine development. If there was some magical law that stated that Japanese engines must be a V8 OHV design it could be safe to say that the engines wouldn't be of the same caliber as those made by American companies.
I will have to agree with you on your first point that displacement is not the end all be all. I am glad we agree here, but you seem to have no real basis for your 2nd comment. The Japanese have had heavier experience with overhead valvetrains than Americans have had (evidenced by the fact that many of today's American engines are still pushrod type motors though the OHV setup is gaining favor as well, while nearly all of today's Japanese engines are OHV). Added experience, along with other factors, would probably give the advantage to the japanese for an OHV V8.


A lower specific output isn't even a sign of an inferior engine. Weight, Volume, Cost, Reliability, and Tunability are all major aspects. "Engineering Capabilities" look at all of those aspects.
A higher specific output creates a more advantageous situation regarding most of those aspects you describe--a higher HP/L engine will require less displacement to produce equal power to a lower HP/L engine, reducing weight, displacement, physical size, and material but not manufacturing cost. With japanese engines in particular, reliability doesnt seem to be an issue with performance engines; supras with $2000 in mods can be boosted to 500HP on stock internals and fuel system; upgrade the fuel system and the stock internals still last up to about 7 or 800 hp. Reliably. Tunability is also not an issue as japanese performance engines are often overengineered and subsequently detuned AKA 2JZ-GTE and RB26DETT among a whole host of others. Even smaller, aluminum-block engines such as the SR20DET are able to create nearly double their stock HP; I believe JUN's S15 silvia produces upwards of 500 hp versus 250 stock. Supras have gone up to 1200; the most powerful r33 GTR skyline (the older model, mind you) that i have seen has 1370hp. I'd have to say japanese engines are quite tunable.


Looking at engines such as the LS6(Z06), 4.6L Supercharged V8(Cobra), 2.4L Turbo I4(SRT-4), and 8.3L V10 (SRT-10) can you honestly say these engines are a bad combination of those traits previously mentioned? All of those cars in stock form put out class leading acceleration numbers.
The viper is a supercar. Stack it up against a Japanese Supercar, a Tommy Kaira ZZII with a 2.6L RB26DETT pushing 500hp, and it will outaccellerate the viper because it weighs next to nothing and i believe has AWD. Put the SRT-4 against the Lancer Evolution and Subaru Imprezza WRX STi (all are small, four-door sport sedans) and the two imports trump the neon. I would continue this further but my contact lenses are fogging up like mad and i need to go take them out. Have a nice night.



And to StockLT1, since you wanted to get confrontational:
originally posted by StockLT1
I lost IQ points reading this
It is a shame that you lost those IQ points, since you obviously cant spare to lose any more of the few you have left.

Last edited by r34 racer; 06-13-2003 at 08:07 PM.
r34 racer is offline  
Old 06-15-2003, 03:20 PM
  #53  
Bullitt4711
Registered User
 
Bullitt4711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I'M BACK!!! High_Velocity_Bullitt Here...

Wow, its great to see all the friendships that have been built here and to see the debates still ragin. I love it.

~Colby

P.S. Oh and for anyone from in SoCal area, a gruop of friends and myself are having an OPEN CAR MEET!

A date has finally been set for the San Diego Meet. We're going to meet at the Canon Building in Mira Mesa (see map below) and then caravan to another location around 11:30-12:00. We'll hang out there for about 1-1 1/2 hrs before leaving for the cruise. We'll be running the road up to Palomar Mountain. I'll post the rest of the details (a scheduled breakdown of the day, dircections for the cruise, my cell#, where we'll eat,etc) a little later, but for now consider this a role call sheet. Post if you're going to coming to this huge meet. It will have close to more than 125 cars (Mustangs, Camaros, Celicas, maybe a few WRX's, possibly some GS400's/IS300's, and probably some older hot rods). This will be the biggest mixed meet ever in San Diego in both size and range with attendees stretching from Texas to Canada. So come out and make it a success.


~Colby
Attached Thumbnails Question for you V8 people (Stangs/Camaros etc..)-post-8-10554872882.jpg  
Bullitt4711 is offline  
Old 06-15-2003, 03:21 PM
  #54  
Bullitt4711
Registered User
 
Bullitt4711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I'M BACK... High

Repeat Post... Sorry

Last edited by Bullitt4711; 06-15-2003 at 03:26 PM.
Bullitt4711 is offline  
Old 06-15-2003, 03:21 PM
  #55  
Bullitt4711
Registered User
 
Bullitt4711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I'M BACK... High_Velocity_Bullitt Here...

Wow, its great to see all the friendships that have been built here and to see the debates still ragin. I love it.

~Colby

P.S. Oh and for anyone from in SoCal area, a gruop of friends and myself are having an OPEN CAR MEET!

A date has finally been set for the San Diego Meet. We're going to meet at the Canon Building in Mira Mesa (see map below) and then caravan to another location around 11:30-12:00. We'll hang out there for about 1-1 1/2 hrs before leaving for the cruise. We'll be running the road up to Palomar Mountain. I'll post the rest of the details (a scheduled breakdown of the day, dircections for the cruise, my cell#, where we'll eat,etc) a little later, but for now consider this a role call sheet. Post if you're going to coming to this huge meet. It will have close to more than 125 cars (Mustangs, Camaros, Celicas, maybe a few WRX's, possibly some GS400's/IS300's, and probably some older hot rods). This will be the biggest mixed meet ever in San Diego in both size and range with attendees stretching from Texas to Canada. So come out and make it a success.


~Colby
Bullitt4711 is offline  
Old 06-15-2003, 03:22 PM
  #56  
Bullitt4711
Registered User
 
Bullitt4711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow, its great to see all the friendships that have been built here and to see the debates still ragin. I love it.

~Colby

P.S. Oh and for anyone from in SoCal area, a gruop of friends and myself are having an OPEN CAR MEET!

A date has finally been set for the San Diego Meet. We're going to meet at the Canon Building in Mira Mesa (see map below) and then caravan to another location around 11:30-12:00. We'll hang out there for about 1-1 1/2 hrs before leaving for the cruise. We'll be running the road up to Palomar Mountain. I'll post the rest of the details (a scheduled breakdown of the day, dircections for the cruise, my cell#, where we'll eat,etc) a little later, but for now consider this a role call sheet. Post if you're going to coming to this huge meet. It will have close to more than 125 cars (Mustangs, Camaros, Celicas, maybe a few WRX's, possibly some GS400's/IS300's, and probably some older hot rods). This will be the biggest mixed meet ever in San Diego in both size and range with attendees stretching from Texas to Canada. So come out and make it a success.


~Colby
Bullitt4711 is offline  
Old 06-15-2003, 11:25 PM
  #57  
D'oh
Registered User
 
D'oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by dj el run
The Corvette is the premier car of GM. All new technology first comes out in the vette, and it is their flagship car. GM could make a bunch of em and sell them in bulk for cheap, and while the car would be easily bought it would not be highly desired.

GM wants everyone growing up to think "when I make enough money I want to buy a vette and I will know I have made it in the world. I want to have status so when I drive down the street everyone will know I'm driving a 40k+ car."

If you have car knowledge, you could make a car run 10's for half the price of a new vette, or a 350z. That's not the point. You're buying the status that comes with the car, the fact that not everyone is driving one.

Yeah, these are some of the points I was afraid of (not because they are bad points, but because they are probably correct and mean that I may not get to have a $30,000 sports car with vette performance unless I buy used).

I agree with the vette being the premier GM car, and right now, it's just about the only GM car I'd want to own. However, I don't want to own it because it is a status symbol, or anything like that. The only reason I want one is because it is simply the best performing sports car for under 70K (or whatever the Viper is costing these days). Most of the people I know who have vettes like them for that same reason (although I don't know too many people who are 50+)

I'm still hoping that the success of the EVO and STI and the Z will make GM realize that a $30K variant of the vette (could be a completely different car, but with similar performance to TODAY's vette - that way it won't compete with the C6) would be very successful.

Anyhow, I guess I've drifted way off topic, so I'll just let this go.

-D'oh!
D'oh is offline  
Old 06-16-2003, 06:18 AM
  #58  
Daytona Blue Z in Bo
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Daytona Blue Z in Bo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FYI - Nissan makes a 4.5 Liter V8 that puts out:

Horsepower 340 @ 6,400 RPM

Torque 333 lb-ft @ 4,000 RPM
Daytona Blue Z in Bo is offline  
Old 06-16-2003, 07:15 PM
  #59  
BlackDemon
Registered User
 
BlackDemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N.O.L.A.
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Daytona Blue Z in Bo
FYI - Nissan makes a 4.5 Liter V8 that puts out:

Horsepower 340 @ 6,400 RPM

Torque 333 lb-ft @ 4,000 RPM
Got a link or any other info?
Or should we just take your word for it?
BlackDemon is offline  
Old 06-17-2003, 10:51 AM
  #60  
jooklum99
Registered User
 
jooklum99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by BlackDemon
Got a link or any other info?
Or should we just take your word for it?
The engine is the VK45DE and his specs are correct.

here is an infinity link:


There was even a dyno there this afternoon.

Back to being Switzerland....not taking sides in this one.
http://www.infinitinews.com/infiniti...q45/tech.shtml

Last edited by jooklum99; 06-17-2003 at 10:55 AM.
jooklum99 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Question for you V8 people (Stangs/Camaros etc..)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:45 PM.