whats is faster Dodge Srt or 350z
#41
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: wow....
Originally posted by quallabone
Is that an *** dyno? What mods do you have?
Is that an *** dyno? What mods do you have?
Mods are Midpipe, catback, downpipe, ECU and programmable commander/Boost controller, ACT Street strip clutch, KOYO racing radiator, 1200 CC secondary injectors, High flow fuel pump. Blitz Stock mount intercooler, RX7fasion cold air box with custom ram air intakes, mazda speed c/f shiftknob, strut tower brace, JVC MP3 player, Bembo slotted/drilled Rotors, rx7.com performance brake padsIm sure im missing a few mods I can think of now. BTW...my MP3 player OWNZZZ you.
Last edited by zerobanger; 06-22-2003 at 01:29 PM.
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by quallabone
How about the twin 20G's going in the vette this winter. Here's one with a T-25mall for comparisson
How about the twin 20G's going in the vette this winter. Here's one with a T-25mall for comparisson
The feeling of the turbos spooling and the torque is pretty awesome, its just wears the engine down more rapid, specially on small displacement engines. n/a rx7s run for 200K +.
#51
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My .02
Ok,
Maybe its that everyone loves to argue, but some things dont make sense to me. I am not attacking anyone, but here are some observations.
*Anyone actually on a 'car board' has a love of cars and will generally think their car is best.
*People buy/want what appeals to them. Looks, speed, refinement, reliability, etc.
Looks: Do I even need to answer this? Eye of the beholder is BS. Z all the way. But I will say that there are plenty of other cars that are pleasing to the eye as well.
Speed: I would give this to the srt. Given the price tag and tunablity, it is unbeatable for a new warranteed car.
Refinement: Again, do I need to answer? The Z is no BMW, but compared to the srt, it is.
Reliability: No opinions at this time, the Z is new and has its share of issues, but noens are not know for their reliability.
Now the real question... what appeals to you? You want speed at a great price? Go srt. You want an overall compromise? Go Z. Cant have it all without big $. Actually, I would have taken an F-body if their refinement and/or reliability was alittle better... looks and speed are unquestionable.
And to whoever said the srt is not a neon... get real. I guess the EVO8 is not a Lancer either, or de-badged STi is only an RS.
Peace out
Maybe its that everyone loves to argue, but some things dont make sense to me. I am not attacking anyone, but here are some observations.
*Anyone actually on a 'car board' has a love of cars and will generally think their car is best.
*People buy/want what appeals to them. Looks, speed, refinement, reliability, etc.
Looks: Do I even need to answer this? Eye of the beholder is BS. Z all the way. But I will say that there are plenty of other cars that are pleasing to the eye as well.
Speed: I would give this to the srt. Given the price tag and tunablity, it is unbeatable for a new warranteed car.
Refinement: Again, do I need to answer? The Z is no BMW, but compared to the srt, it is.
Reliability: No opinions at this time, the Z is new and has its share of issues, but noens are not know for their reliability.
Now the real question... what appeals to you? You want speed at a great price? Go srt. You want an overall compromise? Go Z. Cant have it all without big $. Actually, I would have taken an F-body if their refinement and/or reliability was alittle better... looks and speed are unquestionable.
And to whoever said the srt is not a neon... get real. I guess the EVO8 is not a Lancer either, or de-badged STi is only an RS.
Peace out
#52
Re: My .02
Originally posted by dlt1cy
Ok,
Maybe its that everyone loves to argue, but some things dont make sense to me. I am not attacking anyone, but here are some observations.
*Anyone actually on a 'car board' has a love of cars and will generally think their car is best.
*People buy/want what appeals to them. Looks, speed, refinement, reliability, etc.
Looks: Do I even need to answer this? Eye of the beholder is BS. Z all the way. But I will say that there are plenty of other cars that are pleasing to the eye as well.
Speed: I would give this to the srt. Given the price tag and tunablity, it is unbeatable for a new warranteed car.
Refinement: Again, do I need to answer? The Z is no BMW, but compared to the srt, it is.
Reliability: No opinions at this time, the Z is new and has its share of issues, but noens are not know for their reliability.
Now the real question... what appeals to you? You want speed at a great price? Go srt. You want an overall compromise? Go Z. Cant have it all without big $. Actually, I would have taken an F-body if their refinement and/or reliability was alittle better... looks and speed are unquestionable.
And to whoever said the srt is not a neon... get real. I guess the EVO8 is not a Lancer either, or de-badged STi is only an RS.
Peace out
Ok,
Maybe its that everyone loves to argue, but some things dont make sense to me. I am not attacking anyone, but here are some observations.
*Anyone actually on a 'car board' has a love of cars and will generally think their car is best.
*People buy/want what appeals to them. Looks, speed, refinement, reliability, etc.
Looks: Do I even need to answer this? Eye of the beholder is BS. Z all the way. But I will say that there are plenty of other cars that are pleasing to the eye as well.
Speed: I would give this to the srt. Given the price tag and tunablity, it is unbeatable for a new warranteed car.
Refinement: Again, do I need to answer? The Z is no BMW, but compared to the srt, it is.
Reliability: No opinions at this time, the Z is new and has its share of issues, but noens are not know for their reliability.
Now the real question... what appeals to you? You want speed at a great price? Go srt. You want an overall compromise? Go Z. Cant have it all without big $. Actually, I would have taken an F-body if their refinement and/or reliability was alittle better... looks and speed are unquestionable.
And to whoever said the srt is not a neon... get real. I guess the EVO8 is not a Lancer either, or de-badged STi is only an RS.
Peace out
the OPINION that your Z looks better is.........YOUR OPINION...nothing more.
Open your eyes for gods sake.
#53
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by JamRWS6
Beauty IS in the eye of the beholder.....
the OPINION that your Z looks better is.........YOUR OPINION...nothing more.
Open your eyes for gods sake.
Beauty IS in the eye of the beholder.....
the OPINION that your Z looks better is.........YOUR OPINION...nothing more.
Open your eyes for gods sake.
You think your F body looks better than an Rx7, so it doesn't suprise me you think the Neon looks better than the Z.
#54
Re: Re: Re: Re: wow....
Originally posted by zerobanger
LOL, I have around 360 to the wheels and weigh 2712, I think he will need to be more than "lightly modified".
oh yea and you better be better than 12.99 @ 110.1 mph, I did 13.00 with just 266 rwhp a year ago.
What a joke.
LOL, I have around 360 to the wheels and weigh 2712, I think he will need to be more than "lightly modified".
oh yea and you better be better than 12.99 @ 110.1 mph, I did 13.00 with just 266 rwhp a year ago.
What a joke.
Wow, where did you go to school?
Yea my 3600+ lb car with a mod that cost me 85 bucks ( airlid) and everything else BONE STOCK went 12.99 @ 110. Why don't you go ahead and use one of those MPH & 1/4 mile HP calculators to figure out that is about 330 RWHP and 370+ at the crank.
Does it not cross your mind that your black jellybean weighs alot less and doesn't need as much power...same philosophy as a crotch rocket. 13.00 with a 2700 lb car is not that impressive.
Not only that you are on your 3rd motor now!!!!!!!! Talk about a POS breaking.
I'm on my only motor and I still have WARRANTY...so thanks and have a great day.
BTW there is a little 2001 Z28 with only a Cam here locally if you think you are hot ****....it only runs 11.1 @ 124mph
Or do you just want to step up and run a little ole fox body Vert....yea poor guy is still in the 9s
NO ONE cares about your black jelly bean....we come here to talk about the Nissan 350Z hence www.my350Z.com .
#55
Re: Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by zerobanger
You think your F body looks better than an Rx7, so it doesn't suprise me you think the Neon looks better than the Z.
You think your F body looks better than an Rx7, so it doesn't suprise me you think the Neon looks better than the Z.
So cool guy post up some nice high resolution pictures of your beautiful black jellybean Sorry.....i prefer red....doesn't taste so much like liquorice.
#56
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: wow....
Originally posted by JamRWS6
"better be better"
Wow, where did you go to school?
"better be better"
Wow, where did you go to school?
Yea my 3600+ lb car with a mod that cost me 85 bucks ( airlid) and everything else BONE STOCK went 12.99 @ 110. Why don't you go ahead and use one of those MPH & 1/4 mile HP calculators to figure out that is about 330 RWHP and 370+ at the crank.
Does it not cross your mind that your black jellybean weighs alot less and doesn't need as much power...same philosophy as a crotch rocket. 13.00 with a 2700 lb car is not that impressive.
Not only that you are on your 3rd motor now!!!!!!!! Talk about a POS breaking.
I'm on my only motor and I still have WARRANTY...so thanks and have a great day.
BTW there is a little 2001 Z28 with only a Cam here locally if you think you are hot ****....it only runs 11.1 @ 124mph
Or do you just want to step up and run a little ole fox body Vert....yea poor guy is still in the 9s
NO ONE cares about your black jelly bean....we come here to talk about the Nissan 350Z hence www.my350Z.com .
#57
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by JamRWS6
Yes my car looks A LOT better than your black jellybean.
So cool guy post up some nice high resolution pictures of your beautiful black jellybean Sorry.....i prefer red....doesn't taste so much like liquorice.
Yes my car looks A LOT better than your black jellybean.
So cool guy post up some nice high resolution pictures of your beautiful black jellybean Sorry.....i prefer red....doesn't taste so much like liquorice.
#58
Originally posted by phishie
saying "its still a neon" cannot be compared to "its just a nissan" Practically every car company puts out a top of the line car, and a bottom of the line car. The neon is the pos bottom of the line shitbox from dodge. Nissan makes the Sentra. I don't care if the Sentra ran 10s from the showroom floor. Its still a sentra, and the neon is still a neon.
saying "its still a neon" cannot be compared to "its just a nissan" Practically every car company puts out a top of the line car, and a bottom of the line car. The neon is the pos bottom of the line shitbox from dodge. Nissan makes the Sentra. I don't care if the Sentra ran 10s from the showroom floor. Its still a sentra, and the neon is still a neon.
#59
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by zerobanger
LOL you are joking right? Good one!!
LOL you are joking right? Good one!!
Your car looks like ***....and that is MY opinion.
I can care less about your motor.
I'm done arguing with you...back to the topic.
Last edited by JamRWS6; 06-22-2003 at 05:33 PM.
#60
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree that beauty is an opinion. BUT, what do you think the results of a random poll (any country) would show? 50/50 or 80/20? Would you agree if 80% of the population chose the Z, that it was generally accepted as being a better looking car?