whats is faster Dodge Srt or 350z
#61
Originally posted by dlt1cy
I agree that beauty is an opinion. BUT, what do you think the results of a random poll (any country) would show? 50/50 or 80/20? Would you agree if 80% of the population chose the Z, that it was generally accepted as being a better looking car?
I agree that beauty is an opinion. BUT, what do you think the results of a random poll (any country) would show? 50/50 or 80/20? Would you agree if 80% of the population chose the Z, that it was generally accepted as being a better looking car?
Any one of those factors can skew results let alone when adding them all together.
Personally I think the Z is a much better looking car...but i'm sure SRT-4 owners see it another way.
#62
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If everyone looks at the question without bias and from a car enthusiast point of view, I think there would be no argument that the SRT-4 is a much better buy than a Z from a performance to dollar ratio. Looks are always going to be subjective so how about we just throw that part out. The question is which is faster and I noticed SOME Z owners got a little defensive about some of the answers and started to throw looks and what a real man would prefer into it and now we are here. The Z is a good value for the money if you want good performance with refinement and racing lineage. The SRT-4 is an outstanding buy if you want good performance but are not concerned with refinement or a high level of standard equipment. I think that's being fair to both cars.
#63
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by JamRWS6
Yeah good one....
Your car looks like ***....and that is MY opinion.
And I could care less about you.
I'm done arguing with you...back to the topic.
Yeah good one....
Your car looks like ***....and that is MY opinion.
And I could care less about you.
I'm done arguing with you...back to the topic.
maybe you would like to vote?
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....443#post350443
#64
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Marc's R/T is correct with the exception that it was a Cobra owner that started the "grown man" statement, where it went down hill from there.
Last edited by dlt1cy; 06-22-2003 at 06:00 PM.
#65
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greater Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by JamRWS6
Yeah good one....
Your car looks like ***....and that is MY opinion.
And I could care less about you.
I'm done arguing with you...back to the topic.
Yeah good one....
Your car looks like ***....and that is MY opinion.
And I could care less about you.
I'm done arguing with you...back to the topic.
F-Bodies have GREAT drivetrains but the car itself is a POS. I hate working on them. They are built so cheaply. Every time I crawl under one to do an engine swap or even replace brake pads I cringe. The chassis in those cars is just poo.
RX-7's have an awesome chassis but the engine is about the least reliable engine made.
The solution: buy an RX7 and buy the LS1 conversion kit. You would have a sweet all around car.
Back on topic.
The neon is still a neon. Neon's suck, doesn't matter how fast they go. Just like a Civic. If it is a 7 second Civic, it is still a POS. It's not all about speed IMHO. Quality, handling, and LOOKS! Looks get them wet, not speed!
#66
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: bel air
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by haddixracing
It's not all about speed IMHO. Quality, handling, and LOOKS! Looks get them wet, not speed!
It's not all about speed IMHO. Quality, handling, and LOOKS! Looks get them wet, not speed!
on a lighter note, this is what is so great about the internet. i get to watch grown adults with enough money to reasonably afford all thier wants agrue like little school girls over something somewhat trivial hehe
sure the z is a nicer car, but lets get real. to someone who doenst have any money, like me, the srt is a pretty sweet buy
#67
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by KurtP
i totally hear that.
sure the z is a nicer car, but lets get real. to someone who doenst have any money, like me, the srt is a pretty sweet buy
i totally hear that.
sure the z is a nicer car, but lets get real. to someone who doenst have any money, like me, the srt is a pretty sweet buy
There it is. Bottom line.
#68
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by Marc's R/T
There it is. Bottom line.
There it is. Bottom line.
For the price, they cant be beat. Look at it this way, the Mazdaspeed protege has much nicer interior and looks better, but it lacks in the power/engine department. the money clearly went into the refinement of the car. In the neons case, the money went into the engine/turbo.
Damn good car for the money and nothing to be ashamed of.
#70
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by zerobanger
You know i saw one the other day, it looks every bit as good (exterior) as the evo or sti. Actually, the evo is ugly, I would say its a tossup between the STI and NEON as far as exterior looks go. I dont think they look bad at all (taking the price into conseration). The interior is pretty cheap, but better than the F-body and those were more expensive.
For the price, they cant be beat. Look at it this way, the Mazdaspeed protege has much nicer interior and looks better, but it lacks in the power/engine department. the money clearly went into the refinement of the car. In the neons case, the money went into the engine/turbo.
Damn good car for the money and nothing to be ashamed of.
You know i saw one the other day, it looks every bit as good (exterior) as the evo or sti. Actually, the evo is ugly, I would say its a tossup between the STI and NEON as far as exterior looks go. I dont think they look bad at all (taking the price into conseration). The interior is pretty cheap, but better than the F-body and those were more expensive.
For the price, they cant be beat. Look at it this way, the Mazdaspeed protege has much nicer interior and looks better, but it lacks in the power/engine department. the money clearly went into the refinement of the car. In the neons case, the money went into the engine/turbo.
Damn good car for the money and nothing to be ashamed of.
neon interior better than a TA interior.....
you are dillusional
I personally think your just trying to poke at the F-body guys but moreso i think you are a jackass.
#71
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by JamRWS6
Hahahahahahahahhaahah
neon interior better than a TA interior.....
you are dillusional
I personally think your just trying to poke at the F-body guys but moreso i think you are a jackass.
Hahahahahahahahhaahah
neon interior better than a TA interior.....
you are dillusional
I personally think your just trying to poke at the F-body guys but moreso i think you are a jackass.
its marginaly better, not that much better.
#73
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My .02
Originally posted by KurtP
i totally hear that.
sure the z is a nicer car, but lets get real. to someone who doenst have any money, like me, the srt is a pretty sweet buy
i totally hear that.
sure the z is a nicer car, but lets get real. to someone who doenst have any money, like me, the srt is a pretty sweet buy
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Justin100
Intake Exhaust
26
11-29-2015 03:58 PM