NA Build Inside....Soup to Nuts :)
#41
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
THis thread makes me feel amazing lol. All giddy and stuff lol. Now seeing not 1, but 2 people make a NA build w/ 300+ WHP makes me think i can maybe do it too ahha. It brings hope that soon, 300 will be ez, that soon, we will be able to get that using less and less new parts. IDK, call me crazy, but i think if a few more people invest in NA power, it might soon become alot easier for the rest of us to reach our goals.
#42
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Originally Posted by scratch137
THis thread makes me feel amazing lol. All giddy and stuff lol. Now seeing not 1, but 2 people make a NA build w/ 300+ WHP makes me think i can maybe do it too ahha. It brings hope that soon, 300 will be ez, that soon, we will be able to get that using less and less new parts. IDK, call me crazy, but i think if a few more people invest in NA power, it might soon become alot easier for the rest of us to reach our goals.
Bottom line...this ain't a cheap way to go, and it's more than the sum of it's parts, but I am hoping over time we can do for the NA side of things what some of the others have done for the Forced Induction segment.
Last edited by Z1 Performance; 07-07-2007 at 09:17 AM.
#46
Z + Rear Seat
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: St.Pete,FL
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congratulations on an incredibly interesting project! I'm sure that I'm just one of many people interested in making more NA horsepower without going FI. I'll be following your progress with interest..
I'm curious about putting cams in a VQ. Are all the aftermarket cams ground to provide proper valve-to-piston clearance with stock valve reliefs in the OEM pistons? I know you built your motor from scratch, so you could easily check you clearance, but I read a lot of posts where people install new cams and no one seems to mention needing to fly-cut their pistons for additional clearance.
I'm curious about putting cams in a VQ. Are all the aftermarket cams ground to provide proper valve-to-piston clearance with stock valve reliefs in the OEM pistons? I know you built your motor from scratch, so you could easily check you clearance, but I read a lot of posts where people install new cams and no one seems to mention needing to fly-cut their pistons for additional clearance.
#48
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Originally Posted by 03BlkSETE
Awesome and very inspiring. Are you going to stick with the Tomei cams?
#49
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Originally Posted by __jb
Congratulations on an incredibly interesting project! I'm sure that I'm just one of many people interested in making more NA horsepower without going FI. I'll be following your progress with interest..
I'm curious about putting cams in a VQ. Are all the aftermarket cams ground to provide proper valve-to-piston clearance with stock valve reliefs in the OEM pistons? I know you built your motor from scratch, so you could easily check you clearance, but I read a lot of posts where people install new cams and no one seems to mention needing to fly-cut their pistons for additional clearance.
I'm curious about putting cams in a VQ. Are all the aftermarket cams ground to provide proper valve-to-piston clearance with stock valve reliefs in the OEM pistons? I know you built your motor from scratch, so you could easily check you clearance, but I read a lot of posts where people install new cams and no one seems to mention needing to fly-cut their pistons for additional clearance.
#50
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Corral de Tierra
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great news...thanks for the write-up. I'm really only interested in a NA build and will stay tuned for futher developments. Perhaps you will offer a standard NA build package in the future? If so, I'm in (if it works for the REV-UP too).
#51
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you planning at 1/4 mile stints? To be honest, this is what I have been looking for. I'm curious about the ability of your motor to do 100 miles daily and still be fuel efficient (atleast similar to factory ) What is your plan for selling these or building them. Can I fly out for a test drive?
#52
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Originally Posted by myG35zx
Are you planning at 1/4 mile stints? To be honest, this is what I have been looking for. I'm curious about the ability of your motor to do 100 miles daily and still be fuel efficient (atleast similar to factory ) What is your plan for selling these or building them. Can I fly out for a test drive?
as for selling it, that's getting a bit ahead of ourselves at this point - time will tell
Currently at 1200 miles on the motor BTW
#53
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Corral de Tierra
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
At some point, maybe, but honestly, I am not a 1/4 fan, so who knows
as for selling it, that's getting a bit ahead of ourselves at this point - time will tell
Currently at 1200 miles on the motor BTW
as for selling it, that's getting a bit ahead of ourselves at this point - time will tell
Currently at 1200 miles on the motor BTW
#54
New Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoFL
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you suck! man I envy you, if you see my mods on my profile I am in the same track that you took. Last week I got the 3.9 gear, I am waiting on a good deal for the lsd and JWT C-2 camshafts. I'm not taking the 11:1 compresion path for two reasons, one, after going back and forward with the guys of AP Boss, they told me I will need to run 100 oct. min. not good for a daily driven. The second reason is the time. I use my car every day, and I don't care driving on bucket seat all day, but waking in Miami is not an option, so I can not park my car for more than a week.
I will really like to compare some numbers when I finshed my car. Congratulations!
I will really like to compare some numbers when I finshed my car. Congratulations!
Last edited by Andres_Miami; 07-07-2007 at 03:07 PM.
#55
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Originally Posted by Andres_Miami
you suck! man I envy you, if you see my mods on my profile I am in the same track that you took. Last week I got the 3.9 gear, I am waiting on a good deal for the lsd and JWT C-1 camshafts. I'm not taking the 11:1 compresion path for two reasons, one, after going back and forward with the guys of AP Boss, they told me I will need to run 100 oct. min. not good for a daily driven. The second reason is the time. I use my car every day, and I don't care driving on bucket seat all day, but waking in Miami is not an option, so I can not park my car for more than a week.
I will really like to compare some numbers when I finshed my car. Congratulations!
I will really like to compare some numbers when I finshed my car. Congratulations!
there are lots of cars on the market that run higher than 11.1, from the factory - the static compression ratio you run honestly makes 0 difference...it's all in the tune. If I want to tune this to run on 87 octane, I could. You are talking about an increase in compression of .7 points (in my case, 1 full point). Think about a boosted car - you are looking at multiples of stock compression when under boost. The answer, is, as it is with any good running car, the tuning.
The trick to making the power on these is not just the heads...its being able to rev. That's just not something you can do on an 03/04/non rev up 05 without going the whole 9 yards unfortunately
The above chart is on pump gas, straight 93 octane that I got that morning. We also did a race gas map (110 octane) but I didn't even bother posting it, as it only gained 3 peak whp, even though it took another 3 degrees of timing - that right there goes to show you, the added compression is not taking advantage of the slower burn.
The day I tuned was in the 80's and insanely humid - and we still got to that #, pump gas, on a conservative tune
Last edited by Z1 Performance; 07-07-2007 at 04:20 PM.
#56
New Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoFL
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hell yeah, you can set it up your car to run 87, but don't expect to run 8000rpm, nor having 300hp. I agree with you that there are F.I. Z running on stock engine and boosting enough to go over the 11:1, never the less (and it seams you know your S***T) they don't have 11:1 when they take the foot out of the pedal. You know we can go back and forward on the shear forces that the internals will experience on the 4 stroke process. Point been, is that you will have to go the whole 9 yards as you mention, and that is why you can’t compare F.I. against N/A is this situation.
I believe that the cams have a great deal in this equation, since I can’t make my ECU go over 7000rpms, without putting a stand alone (if you know other way, please let me know. I will really appreciate it). That is why I’m planning on a more aggressive lift/angle for the valves, trying to compensate the lack of rev.
I will also try to shout for the 300whp, let’s see how it goes. At the end if it doesn’t work I guess I will go for the 11:1
Congratulations again!
I believe that the cams have a great deal in this equation, since I can’t make my ECU go over 7000rpms, without putting a stand alone (if you know other way, please let me know. I will really appreciate it). That is why I’m planning on a more aggressive lift/angle for the valves, trying to compensate the lack of rev.
I will also try to shout for the 300whp, let’s see how it goes. At the end if it doesn’t work I guess I will go for the 11:1
Congratulations again!
#57
New Member
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
not for nothing, but they are completely, utterly wrong
there are lots of cars on the market that run higher than 11.1, from the factory - the static compression ratio you run honestly makes 0 difference...it's all in the tune. If I want to tune this to run on 87 octane, I could. You are talking about an increase in compression of .7 points (in my case, 1 full point). Think about a boosted car - you are looking at multiples of stock compression when under boost. The answer, is, as it is with any good running car, the tuning.
The trick to making the power on these is not just the heads...its being able to rev. That's just not something you can do on an 03/04/non rev up 05 without going the whole 9 yards unfortunately
The above chart is on pump gas, straight 93 octane that I got that morning. We also did a race gas map (110 octane) but I didn't even bother posting it, as it only gained 3 peak whp, even though it took another 3 degrees of timing - that right there goes to show you, the added compression is not taking advantage of the slower burn.
The day I tuned was in the 80's and insanely humid - and we still got to that #, pump gas, on a conservative tune
there are lots of cars on the market that run higher than 11.1, from the factory - the static compression ratio you run honestly makes 0 difference...it's all in the tune. If I want to tune this to run on 87 octane, I could. You are talking about an increase in compression of .7 points (in my case, 1 full point). Think about a boosted car - you are looking at multiples of stock compression when under boost. The answer, is, as it is with any good running car, the tuning.
The trick to making the power on these is not just the heads...its being able to rev. That's just not something you can do on an 03/04/non rev up 05 without going the whole 9 yards unfortunately
The above chart is on pump gas, straight 93 octane that I got that morning. We also did a race gas map (110 octane) but I didn't even bother posting it, as it only gained 3 peak whp, even though it took another 3 degrees of timing - that right there goes to show you, the added compression is not taking advantage of the slower burn.
The day I tuned was in the 80's and insanely humid - and we still got to that #, pump gas, on a conservative tune
+100 on the compression. Hell, the GT3 runs what...12.5.1 from the factory? Also if u pulled 303whp on a hot humid day with a conservative tune...then thats insanely awesome!!! I could only imagine what she would put down in the winter time with a more aggresive tune. Also that number you are trying to get...is it 320whp??
Please post vids as soon as u can Adam and post pics when u are done with the rest of the car.
Edit...those valve covers....amazing.
#58
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Originally Posted by Andres_Miami
Hell yeah, you can set it up your car to run 87, but don't expect to run 8000rpm, nor having 300hp. I agree with you that there are F.I. Z running on stock engine and boosting enough to go over the 11:1, never the less (and it seams you know your S***T) they don't have 11:1 when they take the foot out of the pedal. You know we can go back and forward on the shear forces that the internals will experience on the 4 stroke process. Point been, is that you will have to go the whole 9 yards as you mention, and that is why you can’t compare F.I. against N/A is this situation.
I believe that the cams have a great deal in this equation, since I can’t make my ECU go over 7000rpms, without putting a stand alone (if you know other way, please let me know. I will really appreciate it). That is why I’m planning on a more aggressive lift/angle for the valves, trying to compensate the lack of rev.
I will also try to shout for the 300whp, let’s see how it goes. At the end if it doesn’t work I guess I will go for the 11:1
Congratulations again!
I believe that the cams have a great deal in this equation, since I can’t make my ECU go over 7000rpms, without putting a stand alone (if you know other way, please let me know. I will really appreciate it). That is why I’m planning on a more aggressive lift/angle for the valves, trying to compensate the lack of rev.
I will also try to shout for the 300whp, let’s see how it goes. At the end if it doesn’t work I guess I will go for the 11:1
Congratulations again!
Why is your ecu limited to 7k?
#59
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Originally Posted by Nismo 350z
+100 on the compression. Hell, the GT3 runs what...12.5.1 from the factory? Also if u pulled 303whp on a hot humid day with a conservative tune...then thats insanely awesome!!! I could only imagine what she would put down in the winter time with a more aggresive tune. Also that number you are trying to get...is it 320whp??
Please post vids as soon as u can Adam and post pics when u are done with the rest of the car.
Edit...those valve covers....amazing.
Please post vids as soon as u can Adam and post pics when u are done with the rest of the car.
Edit...those valve covers....amazing.
I've got some really nice pics of certain parts of the car now, but with the whole body work being redone this coming week, I'd rather wait till that's wrapped up. But, the same guy (who works for Z1, doing Evo parts sales) who snapped the engine pics, will do the photo shoot of the car upon completion.
Does anyone know what sort of software I need to take a movie I record on my "gasp" Digital 8 camcorder (circa 1999!) and burn it onto my computer?
TIA!