Notices
NA Builds Specifically for naturally aspirated builds & projects with Cams, Pistons Rods, Heads, Valves, etc

300 whp with full bolt ons+cams?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 11:54 AM
  #21  
vthao's Avatar
vthao
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 844
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

Don't forget to get a nice tune...with all those mods and a good tune may be close.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 10:18 PM
  #22  
AEBS's Avatar
AEBS
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: houston
Default

i have a 03 auto with a injen cold air cosworth manifold pulsestar pulseplugs stillen grounding kit hks DL ignition berk metallic cats and skunk2 truedual exhaust and will tune and dyno at uprev soon hope to make 285 to 290. then soon sum cosworth cams valve spings and cosworth heads and retuned should get close to 315 to the wheels but will proably need sgp torque converter and valve body upgrade.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 10:36 PM
  #23  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

for all that, pick up a powerlabs kit, run base boost for 350whp and smile.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 09:18 AM
  #24  
racerfreakxxx's Avatar
racerfreakxxx
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Somers NY
Default



If you want to go n/a it's cuz you love all motor power. In my opinion the more n/a modding you do to the vq the more wtq you lose vs whp. If you are going to spend all that money you might as well get a turbo. If you want to stick all motor I'd rather drop a titan motor in and make it a beast. Also you are probably better off getting a second engine and building it up and then swapping it in. I felt the same a year ago when I had an 03 track. I spent my money on other things and now I decided to go with an vq35hr z and I have all the n/a power I want for now.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 09:22 AM
  #25  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

oh wonderful, let's definitely turn this into another "why don't you just go turbo" thread

we didn't have enough of those already
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #26  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
oh wonderful, let's definitely turn this into another "why don't you just go turbo" thread

we didn't have enough of those already
people still think they can pull 300whp + out of a N/A VQ35DE without dumping a fortune into it. we are here to tell them that there are much better options.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 11:32 AM
  #27  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

different strokes for different folks as they say - neither FI nor NA are better nor worse than one another...just different.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #28  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
different strokes for different folks as they say - neither FI nor NA are better nor worse than one another...just different.
oh yeah im completely agree, a low weight, high powered N/A build that can rev up to 8k would be freakin killer for the track. unfortunately most of the people starting these posts are looking to save money and get a reasonably fast street N/A car but they dont realize by the time you all the N/A upgrades including cams, its just not worth it for their desired use and wont deliver what they truly want.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 02:44 AM
  #29  
AEBS's Avatar
AEBS
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: houston
Default

with my setup i could still do the turbo instead of the cosworth head and cams but i still would need the torque converter and valvebody ant the only thing from my mods i couldnt keep when i went turbo is the injen cold air intake but i bought that when i first got the car in 03 so no big deal but the cosworth manifold the berk metallic cats would be great going turbo and the skunk2 exhuast not the best 4 turbo but not horrible and a 3 inch turbo isnt to much anways. And to the guys says it cost a fortune to go na , not really i did all the installs my self and looked for the best deals on the net i got the manifold for 999 new i got cats 405 stillen grounding kit 65 skunk2 exhaust 650 pulse plugs 100 intake 225 tuned on dyno at uprev 750 = 3195 this spread out over 7 years is really cheap and not to bad of a setup i could add sum stillen underdrive pulleys with belts for 280 and just cam it with jim wolf or bc cams that work with the stock springs but im scared about doing that with the 7200 redline i run with the uprev tune. z1 have any advice with that

Last edited by AEBS; Mar 5, 2009 at 02:56 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:06 AM
  #30  
KA24DE's Avatar
KA24DE
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 363
Likes: 3
From: FLA
Default

WHAT^
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 09:31 PM
  #31  
racerfreakxxx's Avatar
racerfreakxxx
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Somers NY
Default

I <3 N/A especially going from a de to a hr. More rpms = me cumming in my pants at 7k+rpms, the thing roars stock. I still need to put in my intakes and get a full exhaust. I say make 300whp your goal and do it, not saying it's cheaper than turbo but, that's up to you to decide not us.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 09:45 PM
  #32  
djcetra's Avatar
djcetra
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 95
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

All of the "Just go Turbo" posts seem stupid imo. How is it going to be cheaper then an N/A build? Turbo Kits are going to run you about 5-8K, a nice N/A build to get you over 300whp is not likely to hit 5K in price.

Also, don't think that you're going to just spend 5K and have the turbo kit dropped into your car and start flying down the street. If you go turbo you're also going to pay for the labor of putting it together and the ridiculous amount of upkeep to prevent your engine from blowing up. Realistically, a good Turbo is going to cost you over 10,000 dollars if you do it right and build up the engine first before putting the turbo on.

The bottom line is, if you think 10-15,000 dollars is better for someone who just wants 300WHP and can do it for under 5,000 or so, you're trippin' IMO.. Not to mention he can keep a lot of these N/A mods and decide to supercharged instead of turbo for quite cheap anyway if he wants to do FI taking him well over 300whp..
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 02:09 AM
  #33  
OCG35's Avatar
OCG35
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: OC - So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by djcetra
All of the "Just go Turbo" posts seem stupid imo. How is it going to be cheaper then an N/A build? Turbo Kits are going to run you about 5-8K, a nice N/A build to get you over 300whp is not likely to hit 5K in price.

Also, don't think that you're going to just spend 5K and have the turbo kit dropped into your car and start flying down the street. If you go turbo you're also going to pay for the labor of putting it together and the ridiculous amount of upkeep to prevent your engine from blowing up. Realistically, a good Turbo is going to cost you over 10,000 dollars if you do it right and build up the engine first before putting the turbo on.

The bottom line is, if you think 10-15,000 dollars is better for someone who just wants 300WHP and can do it for under 5,000 or so, you're trippin' IMO.. Not to mention he can keep a lot of these N/A mods and decide to supercharged instead of turbo for quite cheap anyway if he wants to do FI taking him well over 300whp..
wow... this post is sooo bass ackwards I cant begin to correct it.

5K for 300hp

Someone please pull his head out from his @ss...
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 03:35 AM
  #34  
twitch579's Avatar
twitch579
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Put on a 50 shot of N20.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 04:25 AM
  #35  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by djcetra
All of the "Just go Turbo" posts seem stupid imo. How is it going to be cheaper then an N/A build? Turbo Kits are going to run you about 5-8K, a nice N/A build to get you over 300whp is not likely to hit 5K in price.

Also, don't think that you're going to just spend 5K and have the turbo kit dropped into your car and start flying down the street. If you go turbo you're also going to pay for the labor of putting it together and the ridiculous amount of upkeep to prevent your engine from blowing up. Realistically, a good Turbo is going to cost you over 10,000 dollars if you do it right and build up the engine first before putting the turbo on.

The bottom line is, if you think 10-15,000 dollars is better for someone who just wants 300WHP and can do it for under 5,000 or so, you're trippin' IMO.. Not to mention he can keep a lot of these N/A mods and decide to supercharged instead of turbo for quite cheap anyway if he wants to do FI taking him well over 300whp..
Your heart is in the right place, but your #'s are not even remotely close to reality

A properly executed NA setup and a single turbo, or vortech kit, are similarly priced at the end of the day. The peak power # will favor the forced induction setups, but that does not make them more fun to the owner. Those who have experienced both, executed properly, will attest to this. Those who haven't, tend to favor the FI based on the #'s. Both can be immensely fun and rewarding, and the performance either can provide is astounding.

Been said a million times - neither is better, just different.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 07:54 PM
  #36  
Chef-J's Avatar
Chef-J
Booooosstt!!
Premier Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,311
Likes: 0
From: Dallas/NewYork/Michigan/Korea
Default

Originally Posted by djcetra
All of the "Just go Turbo" posts seem stupid imo. How is it going to be cheaper then an N/A build? Turbo Kits are going to run you about 5-8K, a nice N/A build to get you over 300whp is not likely to hit 5K in price.

very well N/A build motor can cost more then s/c and S/T setup.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #37  
Chef-J's Avatar
Chef-J
Booooosstt!!
Premier Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,311
Likes: 0
From: Dallas/NewYork/Michigan/Korea
Default

Originally Posted by AEBS
with my setup i could still do the turbo instead of the cosworth head and cams but i still would need the torque converter and valvebody ant the only thing from my mods i couldnt keep when i went turbo is the injen cold air intake but i bought that when i first got the car in 03 so no big deal but the cosworth manifold the berk metallic cats would be great going turbo and the skunk2 exhuast not the best 4 turbo but not horrible and a 3 inch turbo isnt to much anways. And to the guys says it cost a fortune to go na , not really i did all the installs my self and looked for the best deals on the net i got the manifold for 999 new i got cats 405 stillen grounding kit 65 skunk2 exhaust 650 pulse plugs 100 intake 225 tuned on dyno at uprev 750 = 3195 this spread out over 7 years is really cheap and not to bad of a setup i could add sum stillen underdrive pulleys with belts for 280 and just cam it with jim wolf or bc cams that work with the stock springs but im scared about doing that with the 7200 redline i run with the uprev tune. z1 have any advice with that
Best deal??Where?? i got my berk HFC for 380 shipped.
You did spend lot of things that you don't even need...

Last edited by Chef-J; Mar 19, 2009 at 08:29 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 12:31 AM
  #38  
24v GTI Guy's Avatar
24v GTI Guy
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Originally Posted by AEBS
i have a 03 auto with a injen cold air cosworth manifold pulsestar pulseplugs stillen grounding kit hks DL ignition berk metallic cats and skunk2 truedual exhaust and will tune and dyno at uprev soon hope to make 285 to 290. then soon sum cosworth cams valve spings and cosworth heads and retuned should get close to 315 to the wheels but will proably need sgp torque converter and valve body upgrade.
Originally Posted by AEBS
with my setup i could still do the turbo instead of the cosworth head and cams but i still would need the torque converter and valvebody ant the only thing from my mods i couldnt keep when i went turbo is the injen cold air intake but i bought that when i first got the car in 03 so no big deal but the cosworth manifold the berk metallic cats would be great going turbo and the skunk2 exhuast not the best 4 turbo but not horrible and a 3 inch turbo isnt to much anways. And to the guys says it cost a fortune to go na , not really i did all the installs my self and looked for the best deals on the net i got the manifold for 999 new i got cats 405 stillen grounding kit 65 skunk2 exhaust 650 pulse plugs 100 intake 225 tuned on dyno at uprev 750 = 3195 this spread out over 7 years is really cheap and not to bad of a setup i could add sum stillen underdrive pulleys with belts for 280 and just cam it with jim wolf or bc cams that work with the stock springs but im scared about doing that with the 7200 redline i run with the uprev tune. z1 have any advice with that

This poor kid is soo lost its sad...

All I can suggest is that you dedicate this week to running searches on this board. Soo many things you need to learn. Specifically, the limitations of the DE motor as well as what mods do what.

It is apparent from your post that while you have good intentions, you think you know more than you do. So study up kid
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 10:43 AM
  #39  
god350z's Avatar
god350z
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

you can get turbo cars warranties....just have to pay more monthly.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 11:19 AM
  #40  
nEEdb00st's Avatar
nEEdb00st
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: NEW YORK
Default

i think you can do it, with the rigth tune and the right computer...you also should think about shedding some weight.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:07 AM.