300 whp with full bolt ons+cams?
05-31-2011, 09:17 AM
#81
re dynos
i figured id chime in since everyone is using mustang dynos and such, i dyno'd on a dyno-mite. never got to dyno it stock. but with nismo short ram,ams crank pulley,5/16 spacer, headers,test pipes, catback,jwt clutch kit, jwt flywheel it put down 253whp/239 tq. next time i went to the dyno i added a thermal gasket/spacer on the lower collector, and we put utec in and tuned the car, put down 286whp/ 250 tq shows 33hp 11 ft lbs tq gain. ive seen a stock z in town race a same year z with exhaust, 5/16,jwt pop charger, and the stock z takes him by a car everytime..everyone says freak motor.. any opinions?
05-31-2011, 09:18 AM
#82
ops
i figured id chime in since everyone is using mustang dynos and such, i dyno'd on a dyno-mite. never got to dyno it stock. but with nismo short ram,ams crank pulley,5/16 spacer, headers,test pipes, catback,jwt clutch kit, jwt flywheel it put down 253whp/239 tq. next time i went to the dyno i added a thermal gasket/spacer on the lower collector, and we put utec in and tuned the car, put down 286whp/ 250 tq shows 33hp 11 ft lbs tq gain. ive seen a stock z in town race a same year z with exhaust, 5/16,jwt pop charger, and the stock z takes him by a car everytime..everyone says freak motor.. any opinions?
05-31-2011, 11:39 AM
#83
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Largo, MD
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i figured id chime in since everyone is using mustang dynos and such, i dyno'd on a dyno-mite. never got to dyno it stock. but with nismo short ram,ams crank pulley,5/16 spacer, headers,test pipes, catback,jwt clutch kit, jwt flywheel it put down 253whp/239 tq. next time i went to the dyno i added a thermal gasket/spacer on the lower collector, and we put utec in and tuned the car, put down 286whp/ 250 tq shows 33hp 11 ft lbs tq gain. ive seen a stock z in town race a same year z with exhaust, 5/16,jwt pop charger, and the stock z takes him by a car everytime..everyone says freak motor.. any opinions?
Also, could be a driver mod...
05-31-2011, 04:44 PM
#84
You never know what's stock and what's not. Owner could hustling you or may not know his motor is mod'ed (if he is a second owner). Could be the mod'ed Z that gets tapped everytime is on its last leg and is low on compression... too many possiblities.
06-12-2011, 02:17 AM
#85
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You definately can hit 300 whp with the right mods and tune. I just had my NA 350Z dyno tuned on the mustang and I made 291 whp. the Mustang dyno is always lower than the dynojet. My car on the dynojet would make 300 whp easy
06-12-2011, 05:33 AM
#86
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
There are no absolutes when comparing dynos. Mustangs dont always read lower. It all depends on how the dyno is set up. The dyno you use happens to be known to be optimistic. But it doesnt matter. That is why the final # is meaningless - the only important value is the gain % of before vs after. If you're that curious to know how your particular result figures on 1 dynojet there is one in Bayshore you can take it to (Mustang Magic). But it will only compare those 2 dynos it's not a representation of all Mustang Dynos to all Dynojets. Rather than getting hung up on the # since it's not an absolute, just enjoy the car
06-12-2011, 07:26 AM
#87
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are no absolutes when comparing dynos. Mustangs dont always read lower. It all depends on how the dyno is set up. The dyno you use happens to be known to be optimistic. But it doesnt matter. That is why the final # is meaningless - the only important value is the gain % of before vs after. If you're that curious to know how your particular result figures on 1 dynojet there is one in Bayshore you can take it to (Mustang Magic). But it will only compare those 2 dynos it's not a representation of all Mustang Dynos to all Dynojets. Rather than getting hung up on the # since it's not an absolute, just enjoy the car
06-12-2011, 07:35 PM
#89
There are no absolutes when comparing dynos. Mustangs dont always read lower. It all depends on how the dyno is set up. The dyno you use happens to be known to be optimistic. But it doesnt matter. That is why the final # is meaningless - the only important value is the gain % of before vs after. If you're that curious to know how your particular result figures on 1 dynojet there is one in Bayshore you can take it to (Mustang Magic). But it will only compare those 2 dynos it's not a representation of all Mustang Dynos to all Dynojets. Rather than getting hung up on the # since it's not an absolute, just enjoy the car
dont blame them for having that # goal
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
