Notices
Photography Techniques, Cameras, Lenses, & Equipment

*** The Official Digital Photography 101 Thread ***

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2007, 10:16 AM
  #81  
MR_X
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
MR_X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: El Centro, Ca.
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hey is that Ortega Hwy?
Old 01-18-2007, 12:06 PM
  #82  
Tenac1ousZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Tenac1ousZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sunny, smoggy California
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yes it is - the one and only
Old 01-18-2007, 12:23 PM
  #83  
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
zland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oceanside Ca
Posts: 6,086
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z Phil
Very good info, but I guess I'm a bit of a purist. I use digital cameras, but I think using Photoshop (or any such program) to "clean up" photos is a

If you need it, you're not good enough, and you won't improve your skills as a photographer. Plenty of professional photographers have been doing without such "easy bake oven" programs, and it shows in their work. I rarely give props anymore to photos because I can't often tell how much of the quality is due to the photographer's eye, and how much to a software program.
Well if you want to be a purist, how about just make a painting of the car. Better yet, how about get a chisel and make an image on a cave. IMO talent + best tools & technology combined give the best outcome regardless of what medium you are dealing with.
Old 01-18-2007, 12:33 PM
  #84  
I1DER
Registered User
 
I1DER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hood Canal, WA.
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Great, helpful OP. Technology in photography is changing like anything else and new artforms will always emerge. I remember when using a zoom lens was considered cheating because you didn't have to work so much to get the right composition. Now, it wouldn't occur to anyone to think that. This thread is going to inspire some Z owners to get even more joy from their car.
Old 01-18-2007, 12:55 PM
  #85  
imonlykidden
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
imonlykidden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: My own world!
Posts: 7,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

awesome pics. good ideas. i'll use them and apply.

Old 01-19-2007, 09:00 PM
  #86  
vince1611
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
vince1611's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: US
Posts: 173
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

---

Last edited by vince1611; 04-08-2022 at 11:29 PM.
Old 01-19-2007, 09:56 PM
  #87  
bisdakr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
bisdakr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: McAllen, TX
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

CANNON 50MM F1.8 on the way; will take a bunch of pics let you know how it turns out, however I've been wanting to see a pic using a macro lens, my next buy is cannon 100mm f2.8 true macro lens, the kit lens that comes with the xti 18-55 f3.5-5.6 wideangle is pretty good. just been working to pay for this camera, and the front bumper that got painted and didn't match at all, anyways as soon as the bumper gets put on I will take pictures of both 50mm 1.8 and 17-55mm 3.5.
Old 01-20-2007, 01:19 AM
  #88  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bisdakr
CANNON 50MM F1.8 on the way; will take a bunch of pics let you know how it turns out, however I've been wanting to see a pic using a macro lens, my next buy is cannon 100mm f2.8 true macro lens, the kit lens that comes with the xti 18-55 f3.5-5.6 wideangle is pretty good. just been working to pay for this camera, and the front bumper that got painted and didn't match at all, anyways as soon as the bumper gets put on I will take pictures of both 50mm 1.8 and 17-55mm 3.5.
You will not be disappointed with the IQ (Image Quality) of the 50mm 1.8. You will be amazed at photos with aperture wide open... especially compared with the kit lens. I can only imagine having the 50 1.4 or 1.2L and seeing what they can do.

If you want a true macro, you ought to try the Sigma 50mm f3.8. It's true 1:1 macro, and will be my next lens. Also comes with hood as other 3rd party lenses. My experience with the 17-70mm Sigma, the IQ and build quality, has me coming away impressed with Sigma. It's also an EX lens, which is Sigma's higher quality pro type lenses, so build quality is top notch. Best off, it's only $269 at B&H. Of course, you also cannot go wrong with the Canon 100mm macro (according to the reviews), but you just pay a steeper price.

Review of Sigma 50mm 1:1 macro at Photo Zone:
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/len...0_28/index.htm

User reviews of Sigma 50mm 1:1 macro at Fred Miranda:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/s...&cat=38&page=1

Last edited by ctwentytwo; 01-20-2007 at 01:23 AM.
Old 01-20-2007, 08:14 AM
  #89  
bisdakr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
bisdakr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: McAllen, TX
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ctwentytwo
You will not be disappointed with the IQ (Image Quality) of the 50mm 1.8. You will be amazed at photos with aperture wide open... especially compared with the kit lens. I can only imagine having the 50 1.4 or 1.2L and seeing what they can do.

If you want a true macro, you ought to try the Sigma 50mm f3.8. It's true 1:1 macro, and will be my next lens. Also comes with hood as other 3rd party lenses. My experience with the 17-70mm Sigma, the IQ and build quality, has me coming away impressed with Sigma. It's also an EX lens, which is Sigma's higher quality pro type lenses, so build quality is top notch. Best off, it's only $269 at B&H. Of course, you also cannot go wrong with the Canon 100mm macro (according to the reviews), but you just pay a steeper price.

Review of Sigma 50mm 1:1 macro at Photo Zone:
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/len...0_28/index.htm

User reviews of Sigma 50mm 1:1 macro at Fred Miranda:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/s...&cat=38&page=1
those are also nice lenses however I was going for this lense http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...goryNavigation
for macro use so that I can get close enough to my subjects without really being that close, also its a cannon, its a true macro lense which I can also use for close up portraits. I've been itching to go out the shoot, however the weather has kept me inside. 40 degrees out and raining for the past week now.
Old 01-20-2007, 11:55 AM
  #90  
S-tuned
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
S-tuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: north jersey
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dam you got some nice pics .... !!! your friends 5 series aint bad either
Old 01-20-2007, 05:55 PM
  #91  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

for macro use so that I can get close enough to my subjects without really being that close, also its a cannon, its a true macro lense which I can also use for close up portraits. I've been itching to go out the shoot, however the weather has kept me inside. 40 degrees out and raining for the past week now.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I read the Macro brochure that came with the camera That's the lens I was referring to in my post. That Sigma 50mm is also 1:1. I was just referring to it as a CHEAPER alternative to the Canon, if $$$ is tight, yet doesn't sacrifice build quality or IQ.
Old 01-20-2007, 06:06 PM
  #92  
bisdakr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
bisdakr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: McAllen, TX
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

is there anything on the camera, like features that I need to know about(tips and tricks) I just took it out of the box, read a little bit on the brochure and started shooting
Old 01-21-2007, 06:30 AM
  #93  
gr?
Registered User
 
gr?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vince1611
Dood... who doesn't know that? I'm not stupid lol. I'm just saying that the sensors DO get warm and if you do alot of long exposure shots at a constant ISO the noise will increase with more use. If you don't believe me try it yourself! Managing this noise is one of the first things emphasized at Brooks' undergraduate photo program when first switching to digital.
You didn't state that "numerous" long exposure shots will generate excessive heat which induces dark noise. Any beginner reading your statement will believe that a ("a" as in singular) long exposure = noise.
Old 01-21-2007, 06:47 AM
  #94  
Paul350Z
Living in 350Z
iTrader: (1)
 
Paul350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Riverside CA
Posts: 4,704
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Wide angle - that's not wide angle. Here's some wild wide angle distortion.

Nice tips.

Old 01-21-2007, 07:06 AM
  #95  
Paul350Z
Living in 350Z
iTrader: (1)
 
Paul350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Riverside CA
Posts: 4,704
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ctwentytwo
Other things like the settings of computer screens and quality of screen you're viewing images on differ from user to user. I have an iMac Core 2 Duo running in desktop extension mode (using 2 screens at once) with a Gateway 21" high-res widescreen. The iMac screen is alot brighter than the Gateway. The pictures look a little underexposed on the Gateway compared to the iMac.
Have a look at the Huey by Pantone. I've got one sitting next to my monitor. It does two things. First it calibrates your monitor's colors, contrast, and brightness in a semi-automated method - you are required to attach the thing to the front of your screen and click "go". Secondly it monitors the changes in the lighting in your room compensating (optionally) for changes.

At work we use Spyder's but they run like $250 each - this guy was like $60 IIRC ... I've had it more than a year now.
Old 01-21-2007, 07:27 AM
  #96  
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
doug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 16,838
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

I have two Sigma lens for my D70 17-55mm and 50-200m

.. you took some beautiful shots
Old 01-21-2007, 07:41 AM
  #97  
zz350zz
Registered User
 
zz350zz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ikea desk chair
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My favorite is the 70mm long exposure....I love how the traffic on the highway looks while the car is sitting still.


Old 01-21-2007, 07:41 AM
  #98  
leemik
!
iTrader: (2)
 
leemik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ma
Posts: 2,289
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul350Z
Have a look at the Huey by Pantone.
I hav eone of these.. it's awesome..
Old 01-21-2007, 10:29 AM
  #99  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Paul350Z
Wide angle - that's not wide angle. Here's some wild wide angle distortion.

Nice tips.

Wow, shot on a six year old Nikon E990- which I remember to be the camera that was the wet dream of digital camera afficianados. $1000 kept it a wet dream for me. I didn't know manufacturers made wide angle lenses for point and shoot cameras.

That Huey is cheap. I'll definitely be picking one up.

Guys, thanks for the compliments/opinions...

Originally Posted by doug
I have two Sigma lens for my D70 17-55mm and 50-200m

.. you took some beautiful shots
How's about a review/opinion of the lens, and some samples of the pictures?
Old 01-22-2007, 03:54 AM
  #100  
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
doug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 16,838
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Samples: https://my350z.com/forum/media-share/244395-2007-nyc-international-motocycle-show.html

let me just say even though my dad is a professional photographer.. i am really not as educated with cameras as most of you guys are


Quick Reply: *** The Official Digital Photography 101 Thread ***



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 AM.