Is getting a DSL DigiCam really worth the extra money?
The 3 biggest things that attract me to the camera are:
1. Being able to take 2.5 frames per second
2. better quality pics( But are they that much better than a regular Digi pic to justify the price?)
3. The availability of lenses for the camera
1. Being able to take 2.5 frames per second
2. better quality pics( But are they that much better than a regular Digi pic to justify the price?)
3. The availability of lenses for the camera
I assume by dsl you mean digital still life. the whole digi cam term is really old school
1: nearly all mid priced camera can do this
2: its debatable, IMO not really, the camera wont make up for lack of skill-- there are many threads on this topic, do a search
3: the only cameras that have true changeable lens are dSLR. However most mid to upper priced PnS have great lenses and cover the all normal ranges and have rather low f-stop values.
I have many expensive dSLR cameras, and my best shots are from a 5MP canon A530 PnS. Mainly because its small size, allows me to have it on me, more then a large camera around my neck.
Dont fall for the MP count BS and dont think a expensive camera will make you picture look better then a mid priced PnS
1: nearly all mid priced camera can do this
2: its debatable, IMO not really, the camera wont make up for lack of skill-- there are many threads on this topic, do a search
3: the only cameras that have true changeable lens are dSLR. However most mid to upper priced PnS have great lenses and cover the all normal ranges and have rather low f-stop values.
I have many expensive dSLR cameras, and my best shots are from a 5MP canon A530 PnS. Mainly because its small size, allows me to have it on me, more then a large camera around my neck.
Dont fall for the MP count BS and dont think a expensive camera will make you picture look better then a mid priced PnS
Originally Posted by MagicPie
I assume by dsl you mean digital still life. the whole digi cam term is really old school
1: nearly all mid priced camera can do this
2: its debatable, IMO not really, the camera wont make up for lack of skill-- there are many threads on this topic, do a search
3: the only cameras that have true changeable lens are dSLR. However most mid to upper priced PnS have great lenses and cover the all normal ranges and have rather low f-stop values.
I have many expensive dSLR cameras, and my best shots are from a 5MP canon A530 PnS. Mainly because its small size, allows me to have it on me, more then a large camera around my neck.
Dont fall for the MP count BS and dont think a expensive camera will make you picture look better then a mid priced PnS
1: nearly all mid priced camera can do this
2: its debatable, IMO not really, the camera wont make up for lack of skill-- there are many threads on this topic, do a search
3: the only cameras that have true changeable lens are dSLR. However most mid to upper priced PnS have great lenses and cover the all normal ranges and have rather low f-stop values.
I have many expensive dSLR cameras, and my best shots are from a 5MP canon A530 PnS. Mainly because its small size, allows me to have it on me, more then a large camera around my neck.
Dont fall for the MP count BS and dont think a expensive camera will make you picture look better then a mid priced PnS
Originally Posted by MagicPie
I assume by dsl you mean digital still life. the whole digi cam term is really old school
1: nearly all mid priced camera can do this
2: its debatable, IMO not really, the camera wont make up for lack of skill-- there are many threads on this topic, do a search
3: the only cameras that have true changeable lens are dSLR. However most mid to upper priced PnS have great lenses and cover the all normal ranges and have rather low f-stop values.
I have many expensive dSLR cameras, and my best shots are from a 5MP canon A530 PnS. Mainly because its small size, allows me to have it on me, more then a large camera around my neck.
Dont fall for the MP count BS and dont think a expensive camera will make you picture look better then a mid priced PnS
1: nearly all mid priced camera can do this
2: its debatable, IMO not really, the camera wont make up for lack of skill-- there are many threads on this topic, do a search
3: the only cameras that have true changeable lens are dSLR. However most mid to upper priced PnS have great lenses and cover the all normal ranges and have rather low f-stop values.
I have many expensive dSLR cameras, and my best shots are from a 5MP canon A530 PnS. Mainly because its small size, allows me to have it on me, more then a large camera around my neck.
Dont fall for the MP count BS and dont think a expensive camera will make you picture look better then a mid priced PnS
Trending Topics
$200-$350 budget I suggest looking at the mid-upper model Canon A-series cameras or the Panasonic DMC-TZ3. In the right hands I can assure you within normal reason there is no difference compared the a $800-1500 dSLR
Last edited by MagicPie; Aug 20, 2007 at 07:18 PM.
Damn, I just noticed the Panasonic DMC-FZ8 was going for less then $300 on amazon. I just bought it, I suggest you do the same 
Its a PnS that looks and behaves similar to a dSLR, if you need something small then get a Canon A series camera

Its a PnS that looks and behaves similar to a dSLR, if you need something small then get a Canon A series camera
Originally Posted by MagicPie
Damn, I just noticed the Panasonic DMC-FZ8 was going for less then $300 on amazon. I just bought it, I suggest you do the same 
Its a PnS that looks and behaves similar to a dSLR, if you need something small then get a Canon A series camera

Its a PnS that looks and behaves similar to a dSLR, if you need something small then get a Canon A series camera

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM




