Nikon D3 and D300 shattering ISO performance
Originally Posted by ctwentytwo
Camera equipment, unlike other things, have high resale values.
Very important to remember...you wont get stomped if you get a D40 or D40x when you go to resell it.
My D200 body is for sale here.
https://my350z.com/forum/not-z-related-items/324434-fs-mint-us-nikon-d200-dslr-body.html
https://my350z.com/forum/not-z-related-items/324434-fs-mint-us-nikon-d200-dslr-body.html
Just upgraded to the D300. An amazing tool. The low light sensativity, and sharpness is amazing. I know the Canon guys have had this type of stuff for years, but its a first for the Nikon crowd. I rarely, if ever...have to use flash, even indoors, and poor lighting situations.
Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Just upgraded to the D300. An amazing tool. The low light sensativity, and sharpness is amazing. I know the Canon guys have had this type of stuff for years, but its a first for the Nikon crowd. I rarely, if ever...have to use flash, even indoors, and poor lighting situations.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 1
From: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Originally Posted by usmanasif
But that is a function of your lens, though. Using a slow shutter speed with any camera to make up for a not-so-ideal minimum aperture available on the lens will never result in clean, jitter-free, handheld indoor shots or good lighting in a dimly-lit outdoor scene.
man i'm having trouble deciding between purchasing a new lens or the d300 body. my d200 is still actually fairly new.. so i don't i should even though the ISO performance is that insane. but i need to purchase a new lens for this upcoming shoot and more shoots to come. going to shoot a dance competition at the end of the month.
blah. so it's either the new nikkor 24-70 or the d300. but most likely the lens. but its not in stock!
blah. so it's either the new nikkor 24-70 or the d300. but most likely the lens. but its not in stock!
Originally Posted by chartchaiganan
man i'm having trouble deciding between purchasing a new lens or the d300 body. my d200 is still actually fairly new.. so i don't i should even though the ISO performance is that insane. but i need to purchase a new lens for this upcoming shoot and more shoots to come. going to shoot a dance competition at the end of the month.
blah. so it's either the new nikkor 24-70 or the d300. but most likely the lens. but its not in stock!
blah. so it's either the new nikkor 24-70 or the d300. but most likely the lens. but its not in stock!

Check out this guy's reviews..he has a bunch of ISO comparos between different cameras. It's not written in nerdy photog speak...hha!
http://kenrockwell.com/tech/iso-comp...7-10/index.htm
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 1
From: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Funny how we'll spend $2500 for wheels, but DAMNNN...$1700 for a camera???? 
The D3 is $5000.....

The D3 is $5000.....
Sharif, hows about sharing some ISO 3200-6400 shots in low light situations?
Originally Posted by Mansmind
Looks very interesting, but I can't imagine moving from Canon at this point. Lenses are just way to expensive for that (to me anyway).
How's your "new" exhaust holding up.
Originally Posted by ctwentytwo
I find it more funny that people are willing to spend $27-36K on the car, and put $700 wheels on.
Sharif, hows about sharing some ISO 3200-6400 shots in low light situations?
Sharif, hows about sharing some ISO 3200-6400 shots in low light situations?
Sandy was kind enough to be the model. Forgive the background.......I just wanted to see what the cam would do at ISO 2000, and handheld at 1/60 sec. The only light in this shot was from a very small lamp to the right of Sandy....pointed towards the ceiling.



