Notices

Cosworth Plenum FI/NA: Pics Inside!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2007 | 06:45 AM
  #441  
in2therain3's Avatar
in2therain3
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Why do people hate other shops for no reason??
It's not like MRC doesn't know their stuff.
Some people are so one-sided with things where it just becomes ridiculous.
Most people just can't be open minded I guess...
Old 04-02-2007 | 07:58 AM
  #442  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by in2therain3
Why do people hate other shops for no reason??
It's not like MRC doesn't know their stuff.
Some people are so one-sided with things where it just becomes ridiculous.
Most people just can't be open minded I guess...
Some people are so one sided and ignorant they cant let it go, even when their side shows them that they are wrong..I just dont get it.. 22% is about the average high side drive train loss, as Sharif confirmed..Phil just hates us for no reason and loves to attempt to bait me into BS..
Back on topic, Cosworth plenum...Looks very nice, cant wait to se real world testing.
Old 04-02-2007 | 08:31 AM
  #443  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Thread Starter
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
Back on topic, Cosworth plenum...Looks very nice, cant wait to se real world testing.
Thank you MRC.
Old 04-02-2007 | 08:46 AM
  #444  
redline350ZZ's Avatar
redline350ZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: Port Orchard, WA
Default

Question about Plenum volume size. The Cosworth looks like it has more volume but how does the increased volume help. I just "heard" that optimally you would want one that is double the size of your motor, so in our case about 7 liters.
Old 04-02-2007 | 11:42 AM
  #445  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Thread Starter
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by redline350ZZ
Question about Plenum volume size. The Cosworth looks like it has more volume but how does the increased volume help. I just "heard" that optimally you would want one that is double the size of your motor, so in our case about 7 liters.
I dont have that number, but it is larger than stock volume.
Old 04-02-2007 | 07:37 PM
  #446  
Q45tech's Avatar
Q45tech
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, Georgia
Default

Once you get a plenum volume larger than 100% of NA engine displacement the throttle response becomes soft.
As interior space increases (vs. cylinder volume) the buffer or anti-reversion effect increases, but this isn't linear and probably decays to a minimum value with some multiple of cylinder size.
[not sure that matters with drive by wire]
For supercharged make sure the extra air volume is calculated in a desired plenum size. 40% boost = 140% of displacement
Really depends on runner length [torque peak tuning] short runners are more sensitive to plenum volume above [100% of displacement] than longer lower tuned runners...

Unfortunately simple Helmholtz equations get muddy and inaccurate above 5,000 rpm and you need to convert to 1D Wave Equations methods.
http://ceta.mit.edu/pier/pier20/04.980219.Gaffour.pdf

Or jusr cast one in plastic and measure a few volume variations until the point of diminishing returns occurs.

Last edited by Q45tech; 04-02-2007 at 07:44 PM.
Old 04-02-2007 | 08:16 PM
  #447  
Netko350Z's Avatar
Netko350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 7
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by Q45tech

Unfortunately simple Helmholtz equations get muddy and inaccurate above 5,000 rpm and you need to convert to 1D Wave Equations methods.

Huh?
Old 04-03-2007 | 02:57 AM
  #448  
Sk8fe's Avatar
Sk8fe
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Default

I'm glad I'm not the only one. LOL!

F1 engines idle at 8,000 rpm and this year they are capped at 19,000 rpm. My head hurts just thinking what your respose would be for that. LOL!
Old 04-03-2007 | 03:05 AM
  #449  
tranceformer95's Avatar
tranceformer95
New Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,399
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Q45tech
Unfortunately simple Helmholtz equations get muddy and inaccurate above 5,000 rpm and you need to convert to 1D Wave Equations methods.
http://ceta.mit.edu/pier/pier20/04.980219.Gaffour.pdf
Two years ago i probably would have a clear idea of what you were talking about and be able to have an intelligent answer. Damn engineering school! I forgot more everyday!
Old 04-03-2007 | 07:17 AM
  #450  
Q45tech's Avatar
Q45tech
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, Georgia
Default

A few people per year get their Phd from plenum design and spend their entire lives tinkering.

https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/b...+revision2.doc

This one is more to the point in latter half:
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/availab...ssertation.pdf
Old 04-03-2007 | 08:17 AM
  #451  
shushikiary's Avatar
shushikiary
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: denver
Default

Originally Posted by Q45tech
Once you get a plenum volume larger than 100% of NA engine displacement the throttle response becomes soft.
As interior space increases (vs. cylinder volume) the buffer or anti-reversion effect increases, but this isn't linear and probably decays to a minimum value with some multiple of cylinder size.
[not sure that matters with drive by wire]
For supercharged make sure the extra air volume is calculated in a desired plenum size. 40% boost = 140% of displacement
Really depends on runner length [torque peak tuning] short runners are more sensitive to plenum volume above [100% of displacement] than longer lower tuned runners...

Unfortunately simple Helmholtz equations get muddy and inaccurate above 5,000 rpm and you need to convert to 1D Wave Equations methods.
http://ceta.mit.edu/pier/pier20/04.980219.Gaffour.pdf

Or jusr cast one in plastic and measure a few volume variations until the point of diminishing returns occurs.
LOL those wave equations are almost identical to transmission line equations... or to the schrodinger wave equation.... At least it's 1D and not 3D. Most antenea design involves 3D wave equations of this type, which is why you usually get a general idea and then take it to the lab and play around with it tell it works like you want... The equations are a huge pain the **** to solve, and even then you end up in a conundrum because of the boundary conditions such that you cant solve the equations backwards from results. You have to use a finite element analysis or some other step algorithm. Seems like electromagnetics and sound (in this case air flow through the plenum) again have something in common.. lol

I like how classic DSP things are mentioned as well like doing an FFT with a hanning window, and other classic tools for electrical engineers like Lorentz and Laplace transforms, partial diffy q FTW!

I just had a thought though... how come no one has done any wavelet analysis on something like this, it would be perfect for it.

Last edited by shushikiary; 04-03-2007 at 08:36 AM.
Old 04-03-2007 | 08:25 AM
  #452  
Sk8fe's Avatar
Sk8fe
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Default

Woah! This is getting complicated. You guys keep going, I'm going to crack open a Miller High Life!...
Old 04-03-2007 | 02:58 PM
  #453  
soccertoad's Avatar
soccertoad
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Central VA
Default

OK, headers or Cosworth plenum?
Old 04-04-2007 | 05:30 AM
  #454  
Q45tech's Avatar
Q45tech
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, Georgia
Default

One thing not discussed is the design air temperature is very important especially if supercharging is used as the tuning frequency still varies as the speed of sound varies thru the medium.

50F vs 250F changes tuning by 22% [1107 vs 1306 feet per second]
Old 04-04-2007 | 05:59 AM
  #455  
AboostedG's Avatar
AboostedG
Twin Spoolin
Premier Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by soccertoad
OK, headers or Cosworth plenum?

Depends on a few things... Do you plan on going Turbo anytime? If you go with the Cosworth, it won't matter either way. If you go with the headers, it's going to cost just as much, if not more in the long run with probably less usable gains.
Old 04-04-2007 | 11:54 AM
  #456  
kylekyle350z's Avatar
kylekyle350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Rosemead, califorina.
Default

how much is this? and HP gains?
Old 04-04-2007 | 11:57 AM
  #457  
Jay'Z's Avatar
Jay'Z
Banned
iTrader: (118)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 1
From: Carbon Fiber, TX
Default

Originally Posted by kylekyle350z
how much is this? and HP gains?
These are unknown questions if u look back a few pages.......
Old 04-06-2007 | 09:08 PM
  #458  
zzerotwosixty's Avatar
zzerotwosixty
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Default

When are you going to get one Sharif?
Old 04-07-2007 | 09:33 PM
  #459  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Thread Starter
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by zzerotwosixty
When are you going to get one Sharif?
I am the first person on the list....LOL. It was mentioned several pages back, but pricing in mid April (soon), and product in May. I will post updates as they are available.
Old 04-08-2007 | 07:34 AM
  #460  
zzerotwosixty's Avatar
zzerotwosixty
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Default

Thanks. So we should see some test results towards the end of may.


Quick Reply: Cosworth Plenum FI/NA: Pics Inside!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:09 AM.