Notices
Shop Builds Temp moving posts for some clean up of this section.

Stroker + twin 67mm turbos = 718whp pumpgas daily driver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2008, 09:34 AM
  #41  
DanielW
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
DanielW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Concord, North Carolina
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

veddy nice, Daniel want stroker
Old 02-05-2008, 11:07 AM
  #42  
Jonny Boy
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Jonny Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice build. The car looks and sounds awsome.
Old 02-05-2008, 01:48 PM
  #43  
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
failsafe306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: OK
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Very good job guys!

Is she burning some oil though?
Old 02-05-2008, 07:29 PM
  #44  
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
iTrader: (1)
 
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Nice polished Cosworth plenum.

BTW... Sorry if I missed this in another thread, but what are your impressions of the Cosworth plenum on this setup? I noticed from the dynographs that you guys aren't revving it up to 7000RPM (or more). Since it's a built stroker with your head package and the Cosworth plenum, why aren't you guys revving this motor higher?
Old 02-05-2008, 09:12 PM
  #45  
kevinapex
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
 
kevinapex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Evergreen, Colorado
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice work Hal! Massive power, doesn't even sound like the motor is working!!Gota love a over 700 daily driver!
Enjoy it brother!!
Kevin
Old 02-06-2008, 02:12 PM
  #46  
Ivory
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Ivory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

sweet Mike! Way to represent! the lights look fantastic on your car :P
Old 02-06-2008, 06:28 PM
  #47  
Dynosty
Vendor - Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Dynosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
Nice polished Cosworth plenum.

BTW... Sorry if I missed this in another thread, but what are your impressions of the Cosworth plenum on this setup? I noticed from the dynographs that you guys aren't revving it up to 7000RPM (or more). Since it's a built stroker with your head package and the Cosworth plenum, why aren't you guys revving this motor higher?
The Cosworth plenum made significant gains (30-40whp) across the board. With the large powerband on this car, revving high is not required. We have tested it over 7000rpm before but it required another ecu due to the '05 G35 closing the throttle body at 7000rpm. The dynodynamics chart posted above is run to 6900rpm.
Old 02-06-2008, 06:47 PM
  #48  
eagletanggreen
Got Track!!!!!
iTrader: (40)
 
eagletanggreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hal@IP
The ATS triple started slipping above 750whp. A graph of wheel speed vs rpm made it very clear on the dyno. Their only recommendation was "needs more breakin", but this car has been daily driven for 4 months now with this stroker + clutch...

+1

My car was slipping on the dyno at 20psi Same clutch!
Old 02-06-2008, 07:44 PM
  #49  
Kwame
New Member
iTrader: (78)
 
Kwame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 5,219
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
Nice polished Cosworth plenum.

BTW... Sorry if I missed this in another thread, but what are your impressions of the Cosworth plenum on this setup? I noticed from the dynographs that you guys aren't revving it up to 7000RPM (or more). Since it's a built stroker with your head package and the Cosworth plenum, why aren't you guys revving this motor higher?
FYI stroked motors typically have lower powerbands than non-stroked motors. Stroked motors have the ability to rev just as high as non-stroked motors but its just not needed as Hal mentioned earlier.
Old 02-06-2008, 08:21 PM
  #50  
meatbag
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
meatbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hal@IP
The Cosworth plenum made significant gains (30-40whp) across the board. With the large powerband on this car, revving high is not required. We have tested it over 7000rpm before but it required another ecu due to the '05 G35 closing the throttle body at 7000rpm. The dynodynamics chart posted above is run to 6900rpm.
Can you get around this cutoff by any other way then replacing the ECU with something else? I have an Fcon so does this present a problem?
Old 02-06-2008, 08:24 PM
  #51  
Dynosty
Vendor - Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Dynosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by meatbag
Can you get around this cutoff by any other way then replacing the ECU with something else? I have an Fcon so does this present a problem?
What year is your car - only the newer ones do it, and yes same thing with FCON because it does not control drive-by-wire. The easy solution is an ecu reflash to raise rev limiter, but again on this car it is not necessary due to the nice powerband.
Old 02-06-2008, 08:50 PM
  #52  
meatbag
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
meatbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

My car is a 2005.
Old 02-06-2008, 09:26 PM
  #53  
eagletanggreen
Got Track!!!!!
iTrader: (40)
 
eagletanggreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by meatbag
My car is a 2005.

Had the same problem, had Sam at GTM reflash it so I can rev past 7500, also take the speed limiter and bump the idle. Best thing I ever did IMO.
Old 02-06-2008, 10:10 PM
  #54  
maximumsportZ
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
 
maximumsportZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Props guys, thats a hell of a machine.
Old 02-06-2008, 10:15 PM
  #55  
r0mey
350Z-holic
iTrader: (35)
 
r0mey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Morristown, NJ
Posts: 17,785
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by meatbag
Can you get around this cutoff by any other way then replacing the ECU with something else? I have an Fcon so does this present a problem?

I had the same problem with my car you can pm me if you want ill give you the answer I dont want to OT hal's thread. SOLID build hal
Old 02-06-2008, 10:41 PM
  #56  
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
JETPILOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I don't knwo which ATS triple carbon clutch he has, but the soft compound triple clutch discs won't hold at those power levels. You will need the standard or R compound, the 1350 pp, and it sounds like you will need the CCM (carbon coated metal) flywheel and pressure plates which increases torque capacity significantly.

JET
Old 02-07-2008, 07:51 AM
  #57  
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
thawk408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eagletanggreen
+1

My car was slipping on the dyno at 20psi Same clutch!
WTF! I just bought this clutch! I swear if it slips I am going to break someones neck. I have the standard with the 1350 PP.

Last edited by thawk408; 02-07-2008 at 08:00 AM.
Old 02-07-2008, 08:40 AM
  #58  
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona -InP-
Posts: 14,613
Received 215 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

its not like there is much choice thawk.... ill test what mine can handle
Old 02-07-2008, 08:48 AM
  #59  
roncfpz
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
roncfpz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wow, that's crazy amounts of power. Great work.
Old 02-07-2008, 08:51 AM
  #60  
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
thawk408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IIQuickSilverII
its not like there is much choice thawk.... ill test what mine can handle
If it would perform at what it is quoated to do, then it wont be a problem.


Quick Reply: Stroker + twin 67mm turbos = 718whp pumpgas daily driver



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:40 AM.