Notices
Shop Builds Temp moving posts for some clean up of this section.

Sound Performance hits 1017rwhp!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #21  
DanielW's Avatar
DanielW
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

not to be that guy, but.... why not do it on a dj or dd to avoid skepticism that is invariably gonna come up with mustang dyno results?


congrats anyway though. I'd like to see an overlay of this and the gt37r dyno
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #22  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

good god that's sick!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #23  
D350Z10's Avatar
D350Z10
New Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by DanielW
not to be that guy, but.... why not do it on a dj or dd to avoid skepticism that is invariably gonna come up with mustang dyno results?


congrats anyway though. I'd like to see an overlay of this and the gt37r dyno

Are you kidding??? Mustang dynos are very accurate if you know anything about dyno's. They are also generally low reading depending on calibration.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 05:08 PM
  #24  
SoundPerformance's Avatar
SoundPerformance
Sponsor
Sound Performance
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 1
From: Bloomingdale, IL
Default

Originally Posted by DanielW
not to be that guy, but.... why not do it on a dj or dd to avoid skepticism that is invariably gonna come up with mustang dyno results?


congrats anyway though. I'd like to see an overlay of this and the gt37r dyno
Um..... because we have a Mustang dyno in house!! Honestly I am not one to compare one dyno to another..... We will let our Z speak for itself when we get it on the track!!!


I am pretty sure that the GT37R car had a 4.2 stroker in it as opposed to our 3.5. 20% more displacement will generate a TON more torque!!! Our goal was to push the 3.5 as far as possible as we feel that 95% of people will use a 3.5!!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 05:11 PM
  #25  
SoundPerformance's Avatar
SoundPerformance
Sponsor
Sound Performance
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 1
From: Bloomingdale, IL
Default

Originally Posted by turismo
Congrats on the numbers. Torque numbers seem kinda low though.
Put a pair of 67s on a 3.5 L and this is what you get!!! Remember that anyone else that has a turbo setup nearly as powerful as ours has a stroker motor!!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #26  
Kwame's Avatar
Kwame
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 19
From: New York
Default

Congrats! Impressive numbers.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 05:24 PM
  #27  
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,613
Likes: 215
From: Arizona -InP-
Default

congrats larry and chris... car is bad ***....hope to see videos soon!!!....and 35 psi?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #28  
Dynosty's Avatar
Dynosty
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 11
From: Louisville, KY
Default

Congrats guys Now it's time to get to the track!!! Are we ready to start Z drag events similar to the old 2J ones?

ps. were these numbers with DJ correction like the others?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #29  
SoundPerformance's Avatar
SoundPerformance
Sponsor
Sound Performance
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 1
From: Bloomingdale, IL
Default

Originally Posted by IIQuickSilverII
congrats larry and chris... car is bad ***....hope to see videos soon!!!....and 35 psi?

Why only 35??

If the turbos can make 40, she will see 40!!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #30  
Dynosty's Avatar
Dynosty
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 11
From: Louisville, KY
Default

Originally Posted by SoundPerformance
Why only 35??

If the turbos can make 40, she will see 40!!
I like how you think!!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #31  
BornSlippyZ's Avatar
BornSlippyZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota!
Default

Wow! Fantastic looking intake, Nice numbers.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 08:45 PM
  #32  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Chris@SP
Thanks again everyone.

Here are some pics of Charlies intake mani




Chris
First of all... Congrats on the new horsepower record!

^ I really like the design of Charlie's intake manifold. Does it have clearance for a strut tower brace?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #33  
Chef-J's Avatar
Chef-J
Booooosstt!!
Premier Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,311
Likes: 0
From: Dallas/NewYork/Michigan/Korea
Default

Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #34  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
Does it have clearance for a strut tower brace?
The CJM intake manifold damn near hits the hood!

Only a Crawford or APS strut bar would fit it.

We might even produce an optional spacer for increased displacement for those who want to custom cowl their hood or use a Stillen hood.

As for mass production, aluminum casting is in the process as we speak. Completion is not yet set, but it wont be too long and availability will be good since all we have to do once its cast is the secondary machining processes. Pricing is expected to be competitive.

Lastly, CONGRATS on the power. Huge success! I cant wait to see 35-40psi!!!!! I hope that the prototype sheet metal plenum doesnt pop! The production parts have supports in the middle like the stock plenums.

Last edited by phunk; Sep 8, 2008 at 11:03 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 07:58 AM
  #35  
DanielW's Avatar
DanielW
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by D350Z10
Are you kidding??? Mustang dynos are very accurate if you know anything about dyno's. They are also generally low reading depending on calibration.

Exactly.... depending on calibration. Its well known that you can fudge numbers on a mustang dyno. Not implying that this went on at all here by any means btw.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 08:06 AM
  #36  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
The CJM intake manifold damn near hits the hood!

Only a Crawford or APS strut bar would fit it.

We might even produce an optional spacer for increased displacement for those who want to custom cowl their hood or use a Stillen hood.

As for mass production, aluminum casting is in the process as we speak. Completion is not yet set, but it wont be too long and availability will be good since all we have to do once its cast is the secondary machining processes. Pricing is expected to be competitive.

Lastly, CONGRATS on the power. Huge success! I cant wait to see 35-40psi!!!!! I hope that the prototype sheet metal plenum doesnt pop! The production parts have supports in the middle like the stock plenums.
Well then... Good thing the G doesn't come with a strut tower brace!
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 09:09 AM
  #37  
JDSMotoring's Avatar
JDSMotoring
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 1
From: Central Jersey
Default

WOW!!! thats a sick manifold
nice numbers on the buildup...cant wait to see what it does on the track
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 09:13 AM
  #38  
DanielW's Avatar
DanielW
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by zpaaji
WOW!!! thats a sick manifold
nice numbers on the buildup...cant wait to see what it does on the track


+1 can't wait to see this thing take the six speed quarter mile record
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #39  
saberphx's Avatar
saberphx
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 0
From: america
Default

Looks awesome, vids??
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 11:19 AM
  #40  
thom000001's Avatar
thom000001
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

My 04 G coupe stock on this same dyno did 232rwhp and 227rwtq

so the dyno reads right in line with the dynojet numbers for the same cars (actually probably reads a touch low)

I know Chris and Larry, they'll let numbers at the track show what the car has...the dyno is just a good tool to see how changes affect the setup and check for safe perameters.

Tom

Originally Posted by DanielW
Exactly.... depending on calibration. Its well known that you can fudge numbers on a mustang dyno. Not implying that this went on at all here by any means btw.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:48 AM.