MRC has done it again..673 whp!!
Originally Posted by 350zDCalb
wasn't skeptical, just wanted an explanataion as to how the power jumped up over 100rwhp on the same boost level..is that an unfair question?
I have some pretty decked out heads as well, we made 635rwhp on 14psi, with hardly any timing, very conservative tune...I know it is possible
-TODD
I have some pretty decked out heads as well, we made 635rwhp on 14psi, with hardly any timing, very conservative tune...I know it is possible
-TODD
So what you are saying julian is that if i used your correction factor, (it's actually 1.15, 1.13 gives you 662 from 585) i should be at 506rwhp on a dynojet? i don't even know why you bother. you guys seem to be putting out some awesome cars, who cares what people think? 585 at 12psi is a great number on a load based dyno, why even use some silly correction factor to pump up your rwhp number? good luck at the track today.
Originally Posted by Bullitproof
So what you are saying julian is that if i used your correction factor, (it's actually 1.15, 1.13 gives you 662 from 585) i should be at 506rwhp on a dynojet? i don't even know why you bother. you guys seem to be putting out some awesome cars, who cares what people think? 585 at 12psi is a great number on a load based dyno, why even use some silly correction factor to pump up your rwhp number? good luck at the track today.
Actually my corrected # I simply subtracted 13% from 673 and it gives you 585, I have my most recent uncorrected dyno of 592 sitting right here to scan.
Last edited by Julian@MRC; Jul 7, 2006 at 03:38 AM.
Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
This is true, but unfortunatley people want to see the Dyno jet numbers..I will be getting to a dyno jet this week sometime to compare #'s for arguments sake. However there are several other high HP 350Z's on this board that used the same dyno and same correction factors without being questioned. Our numbers are legit and we will back them up with time slips and secondary dynos so there is no doubt.
Actually my corrected # I simply subtracted 13% from 673 and it gives you 585, I have my most recent uncorrected dyno of 592 sitting right here to scan.
Actually my corrected # I simply subtracted 13% from 673 and it gives you 585, I have my most recent uncorrected dyno of 592 sitting right here to scan.
Originally Posted by Bullitproof
You don't have anything to prove to me, your rep precedes you. hopefully i'll be able to see you run that monster at one of the jersey tracks soon.
Just show them a time slip - there are guys on here quoting 800hp+ blah blah and can even break into the 10's...
nothing but excuses... Pretty pathetic if you ask me... Frankly, I would smash my car into a wall and set it on fire if I ran high 11's with 800 hp - lol... those that know me would back this statement up 100%.
Not sure what you guys have done suspension wise, but that was the biggest limiting factor for us. Robispec has helped us out tremendously, and we're finally getting there and it wasn't cheap!
MRC has built a fast car, and I'm sure they'll be posting some impressive time slips soon.
Not sure what you guys have done suspension wise, but that was the biggest limiting factor for us. Robispec has helped us out tremendously, and we're finally getting there and it wasn't cheap!
MRC has built a fast car, and I'm sure they'll be posting some impressive time slips soon.
Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
We will be at Etown tonight..
Originally Posted by Philthy
Just show them a time slip - there are guys on here quoting 800hp+ blah blah and can even break into the 10's...
nothing but excuses... Pretty pathetic if you ask me... Frankly, I would smash my car into a wall and set it on fire if I ran high 11's with 800 hp - lol... those that know me would back this statement up 100%.
Not sure what you guys have done suspension wise, but that was the biggest limiting factor for us. Robispec has helped us out tremendously, and we're finally getting there and it wasn't cheap!
MRC has built a fast car, and I'm sure they'll be posting some impressive time slips soon.
Not sure what you guys have done suspension wise, but that was the biggest limiting factor for us. Robispec has helped us out tremendously, and we're finally getting there and it wasn't cheap!
MRC has built a fast car, and I'm sure they'll be posting some impressive time slips soon.

Originally Posted by bigbri
What the F is your deal I know who that statement is directed to and thats BullShiat...It's not my fault I went to a track preped like it was on ice not to mention that was my first time to the track with that much power so I was relearning the car as well..I'm surprised I was able to run what I ran...So don't make Fuken lil hints like you are...You'll have your Fuken 10 sec time slip...
Your have a high hp car where the F are your timeslips....Have you even ran it yet???
Originally Posted by bigbri
What the F is your deal I know who that statement is directed to and thats BullShiat...It's not my fault I went to a track preped like it was on ice not to mention that was my first time to the track with that much power so I was relearning the car as well..I'm surprised I was able to run what I ran...So don't make Fuken lil hints like you are...You'll have your Fuken 10 sec time slip...
Your have a high hp car where the F are your timeslips....Have you even ran it yet???
Play nice, dont ruin my thread you two..
Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
Guys,
Play nice, dont ruin my thread you two..
Play nice, dont ruin my thread you two..

Originally Posted by Vq.turbo.DremZ
What times did you guys run yesterday at Englishtown?
Car should have a 1.68-1.75 60 ft and do 11.1-11.2'sVehicle weight 3780 with driver (fat *** 260)
https://my350z.com/forum/attachment....5&d=1152362109
Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
****ty times...11.6@124 with a 1.9 60ft, UTEC was picking up knock and pulling timing going down the track, I need better octane gas in the car and some driving lessons.
Car should have a 1.68-1.75 60 ft and do 11.1-11.2's
Vehicle weight 3780 with driver (fat *** 260)
https://my350z.com/forum/attachment....5&d=1152362109
Car should have a 1.68-1.75 60 ft and do 11.1-11.2'sVehicle weight 3780 with driver (fat *** 260)
https://my350z.com/forum/attachment....5&d=1152362109




