Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

Unichip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #1  
Changvi's Avatar
Changvi
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere
Default Unichip

I just had Unichip installed and tuned in conjuntion to my AFCII already installed prior to Unichip. The shop set the AFC back to zero with no air and fuel adjustments. Do you guys think that even with the AFC set to zero would affect the performance of the Unichip? Or should i just have the AFC removed completely. I'm asking because of my prior post regarding my dyno graph of gaining only 2whp after header and Unichip tune. Any comments would be appreciated.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 03:20 AM
  #2  
chris'smax's Avatar
chris'smax
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: On dicks
Default

Originally Posted by Changvi
I just had Unichip installed and tuned in conjuntion to my AFCII already installed prior to Unichip. The shop set the AFC back to zero with no air and fuel adjustments. Do you guys think that even with the AFC set to zero would affect the performance of the Unichip? Or should i just have the AFC removed completely. I'm asking because of my prior post regarding my dyno graph of gaining only 2whp after header and Unichip tune. Any comments would be appreciated.

I would remove the SAFC all together. I thnk the afc would be a problem if it was after the unichip in the series(meaning unichip=>SAFC=>ECU). In this scenario the SAFC would be distorting the alteration to maf sensor signal that was made by the unichip.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 08:53 AM
  #3  
Changvi's Avatar
Changvi
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere
Default

Originally Posted by chris'smax
I would remove the SAFC all together. I thnk the afc would be a problem if it was after the unichip in the series(meaning unichip=>SAFC=>ECU). In this scenario the SAFC would be distorting the alteration to maf sensor signal that was made by the unichip.
Even with the setting at zero? hm.....i will have the AFC removed this weekend.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 08:56 AM
  #4  
GSoccer24's Avatar
GSoccer24
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Framingham, Massachusetts
Default

+1 on removing the AFCII
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 09:29 AM
  #5  
chris'smax's Avatar
chris'smax
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: On dicks
Default

Originally Posted by Changvi
Even with the setting at zero? hm.....i will have the AFC removed this weekend.

That is true but you still need to remove the AFC2. Could you post a graph of your AFR from your Dyno sheet
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #6  
Changvi's Avatar
Changvi
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere
Default

Here....https://my350z.com/forum/northern-california/265353-unichip-dyno.html
The top two are dyno before headers and unichip a couple months ago. The last three bottom graphs are the recent dyno after unichip and headers. Its kind of blurry, but the last graph that shows the AF ratio is actually 12.96 then tapers off to 13.01

Last edited by Changvi; Apr 20, 2007 at 09:53 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bullitproof
Forced Induction
14
Jan 6, 2006 05:12 PM
Enron Exec
Forced Induction
7
Jul 5, 2005 07:10 AM
cjb80
Forced Induction
14
Dec 20, 2004 01:31 PM
Dizzy
Tuning
65
Nov 24, 2004 10:47 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:18 PM.