so i got the cams in....been dynoed untuned
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so i got the cams in....been dynoed untuned
when i get the dyno i will post it. lots of room for improvement! dynoed 255/245 on DJ. AFR was 14.5 to 4k rmps and 12 after that....
any thoughts? anyone dynoed there n/a cammed car untuned? i want a comparision
any thoughts? anyone dynoed there n/a cammed car untuned? i want a comparision
#2
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Originally Posted by baby_ruiner
when i get the dyno i will post it. lots of room for improvement! dynoed 255/245 on DJ. AFR was 14.5 to 4k rmps and 12 after that....
any thoughts? anyone dynoed there n/a cammed car untuned? i want a comparision
any thoughts? anyone dynoed there n/a cammed car untuned? i want a comparision
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i am running a 0 map now. we didnt have time to tune it bc i did it at 7pm last night. it should be tuned mid march bc im going outa town but i had a rock crack my wind sheild last night so that might hold me back a week bc i need to fix that. i was utec tuned when i was just bolt ons. im going to call tomei and see what afr these cams like, i know some cams like it a lil bit richer.
#4
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Why not rent some dyno time and just tune it yourself after you figure out where you want your new targets?
Try some different 'safe' AFR/ timing combos. See which configuration makes the most/ smoothest power. Pay careful attention to knock.
Try some different 'safe' AFR/ timing combos. See which configuration makes the most/ smoothest power. Pay careful attention to knock.
Last edited by gothchick; 02-28-2008 at 12:09 PM.
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i trust my tuner, ill let him do it. he lets me put in my 2 cents and im in the car when he does it. plus he usuing him is cheaper then dyno time. last time i paid him 250 and we were on the dyno 6 hrs. the relationship my bf and i have with our shop is very strong and we get amazing hookups on parts and labor, plus his knowledge abou cars is 1000000x greater then mine. i know my car will come off the dyno safe and he will always go in a tweek it for free after the fact
i heart my little vette shop
i heart my little vette shop
#6
New Member
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by baby_ruiner
when i get the dyno i will post it. lots of room for improvement! dynoed 255/245 on DJ. AFR was 14.5 to 4k rmps and 12 after that....
any thoughts? anyone dynoed there n/a cammed car untuned? i want a comparision
any thoughts? anyone dynoed there n/a cammed car untuned? i want a comparision
What cams are you running again (Tomei 264 or 268? I forgot) and what did you dyno at prior to the cam installation? When I dynoed on my stock map my afr were in the 14's until 6000rpm.
Trending Topics
#8
New Member
iTrader: (41)
Originally Posted by rednezz
I thought you were putting down 280 with boltons on a dynojet?
Anyway here is my untuned dyno and keep in mind this is with a bad coil pack and bad crank sensor.
Anyway here is my untuned dyno and keep in mind this is with a bad coil pack and bad crank sensor.
#9
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For him to go from 280 to 255 just by adding cams is a giant loss that he probably will not pick back up by just tuning A/F and timing. I was only able to pick up around 10 rwhp from just tuning A/F and timing. Most of my gains came from adjusting the VTC angles on the intake cam. Even then I don't think can he gain 30+ rwhp with a full tune including the VTC angle advancement by just installing cams. I have a fully built NA engine and with a full tune including VTC gained 32 rwhp from the untuned dyno run.
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: atlanta
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well... SHE dyno'd at 270/265 with bolt on's tuned... untuned with the bolt ons the baseline was 237. so the baseline with bolt on's and cams is 255/245 isnt a bad increase... so i'm estimating mid-high 280s tuned with the cams.
ps, this is her bf... so i know her setup pretty well
ps, this is her bf... so i know her setup pretty well
#13
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just making sure I'm reading this correctly. You guys basically ditched the "bolt-on" tune when you put in the cams and brought everything back down to stock? That makes sense.
Originally Posted by collinsGTO
well... SHE dyno'd at 270/265 with bolt on's tuned... untuned with the bolt ons the baseline was 237. so the baseline with bolt on's and cams is 255/245 isnt a bad increase... so i'm estimating mid-high 280s tuned with the cams.
ps, this is her bf... so i know her setup pretty well
ps, this is her bf... so i know her setup pretty well
#15
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think that's what I said. I don't know why they'd pull off their other mods.
When I say "brought back to stock" I'm talking about the tune.
When I say "brought back to stock" I'm talking about the tune.
Originally Posted by gothchick
No... I think they ditched the bolton tune when they put the cams in. I'd imagine they also kept the boltons...
But I'd still really like to see the pre-cam / post-cam dynos.
But I'd still really like to see the pre-cam / post-cam dynos.
#16
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by collinsGTO
well... SHE dyno'd at 270/265 with bolt on's tuned... untuned with the bolt ons the baseline was 237. so the baseline with bolt on's and cams is 255/245 isnt a bad increase... so i'm estimating mid-high 280s tuned with the cams.
ps, this is her bf... so i know her setup pretty well
ps, this is her bf... so i know her setup pretty well
Last edited by rednezz; 02-28-2008 at 05:20 PM.
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: atlanta
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
higher compression will do that for ya and no, that was not a typo. it was 270/265. this was the same day/dyno chadbee's 2003 350z (in stock form) put down 230/225.
and yes, all the bolt-on's are still there, just put it back to the base map on the utec, so basically she's running on the stock tune/ecu.
and by bolt on's, i mean ALL the bolt ons like intake, headers, test pipes, exhaust, plenum spacer... ok, well everything except underdrive pullies
and yes, all the bolt-on's are still there, just put it back to the base map on the utec, so basically she's running on the stock tune/ecu.
and by bolt on's, i mean ALL the bolt ons like intake, headers, test pipes, exhaust, plenum spacer... ok, well everything except underdrive pullies
#19
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
I would say 10-15whp for the cams. Unless you get really huge cams you wont get more than that. I made over 230whp on a mustang dyno on my low compression engine. That was with only 23 degrees of timing but i have a bad o2 sensor and a manifold leak so ill tune/dyno it one more time after thats fixed before I turbo it. 230 on a mustang should be around 250-265 on a dynojet, not bad for a low compression engine. BTW 14 in midrang and 12.0-11.5 are normal a/f ratios for the stock ecu. With good gas i would run it at 13.2 with about 28-32 degrees of timing advance.