Notices
VQ35HR Mods and Support related to the 2007/08 High Revving VQ

NEW Intake Manifold for VQ35HR!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 04:24 PM
  #221  
350ZUC's Avatar
350ZUC
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
Default

Spoke with John today..(hey john lol) ... I should have a DE manifold early next week. As soon as I get I will post some hi-res pics of it, and installed. Dyno sheets will hopefully be up by late March/ early April.
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 11:26 PM
  #222  
kramykram's Avatar
kramykram
Registered User
iTrader: (135)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 0
From: biloxi,mississippi
Default

yay looking foward to results still. good thing this is not ready yet so i can purchase new rims.
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 06:38 AM
  #223  
shadykilla717's Avatar
shadykilla717
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
Default

I can't wait for dyno and pics. This might really be worth looking into.. I wouldn't have a problem getting this at all.
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 07:34 AM
  #224  
350ZUC's Avatar
350ZUC
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
Default

Again, I know this isn't the manifold for your guy's motor.. but I spoke to him again and he should be getting the fittings for the DE today and finishing it up, so I'm assuming I should have it Tuesday or Wednesday.
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 07:38 AM
  #225  
A.H's Avatar
A.H
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
From: SoCal 818
Default

John gave me a call on Saturday for an update.


Basically, they finally got all parts and supplies needed in on wednesday/thursday of last week so they have been working on it. I should have it by the end of this week or beginning of next week at the very latest. Dyno results to follow of course
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 08:52 AM
  #226  
biggersNISMO's Avatar
biggersNISMO
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 551
Likes: 1
From: South Indianapolis
Default

yes!!!!! can't wait Arsh!!!

im guessing 8whp??
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 09:21 AM
  #227  
Blck350z's Avatar
Blck350z
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 649
Likes: 1
From: hershey, Pennsylvania
Default

will you be able to take pics of it installed???? or is there still legal items to be addressed before you can do that????
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #228  
MDHRZ's Avatar
MDHRZ
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,026
Likes: 0
From: Southern MD
Default

Originally Posted by 350ZUC
Again, I know this isn't the manifold for your guy's motor.. but I spoke to him again and he should be getting the fittings for the DE today and finishing it up, so I'm assuming I should have it Tuesday or Wednesday.
So why do you keep posting it in the HR section
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 09:49 AM
  #229  
350ZUC's Avatar
350ZUC
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
Default

Because I figured you guys would want to see the quality and what kind of work he does.. to get an idea of the one that's being made for the HR.
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 09:51 AM
  #230  
A.H's Avatar
A.H
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
From: SoCal 818
Default

Originally Posted by Blck350z
will you be able to take pics of it installed???? or is there still legal items to be addressed before you can do that????
I am 99% sure that by the time I get it, I'm allowed to take high res pics uninstalled and a couple days later pics installed. Can't wait....literally. I want
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #231  
Vq.turbo.DremZ's Avatar
Vq.turbo.DremZ
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
Default

Call me pessimistic, but on a completely stock car i find it hard to believe this manifold will have XX gains that have been thrown around.

Last edited by Vq.turbo.DremZ; Mar 16, 2009 at 10:11 AM.
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 10:51 AM
  #232  
A.H's Avatar
A.H
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
From: SoCal 818
Default

Originally Posted by Vq.turbo.DremZ
Call me pessimistic, but on a completely stock car i find it hard to believe this manifold will have XX gains that have been thrown around.
I can understand that and I don't find it pessimistic. Only dyno results will show for sure but I personally don't know too much about the HR manifolds to even give my opinion on how I think it might react to a stock car.

i will however ask Tadashi and post his impressions on this manifold and how he thinks the car will react to a Revshift Intake manifold on a stock car. And maybe if someone is stock and wants to help out I could let them borrow my manifold so they can do a before and after dyno @technosquare to compare dyno results. That way, we will know how the intake manifold will react to a car with maximum flow(full bolt ons) and a car with stock flow. I'll try to set something up after I hear what Tadashi has to say
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 10:57 AM
  #233  
Sergio07350Z's Avatar
Sergio07350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: SoCal Loma Linda
Default

I feel like a little kid waiting for Christmas. lol
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 11:02 AM
  #234  
KS0385's Avatar
KS0385
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 1
From: Boston, MA
Default

Yah. This is taking too long. Hurrrrrrrrrrrrry.
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 01:32 PM
  #235  
JZK's Avatar
JZK
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky :D
Default

-3 whp
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 06:18 PM
  #236  
8cd03gro's Avatar
8cd03gro
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Default

i feel like a stock car would be a waste with an aftermarket manifold. There will be bottlenecks on both the intake side and exhaust side after a manifold. I would say 10hp would be optimistic with a stock car, but with the right supporting mods, 10+rwhp is definitely reasonable.
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 06:23 PM
  #237  
0jiggy0's Avatar
0jiggy0
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 13
From: Long Island, NY
Default

i honestly dont think anyone with a bone stock car would get this because it would make no sense as a first mod. Pretty sure its been established that the stock one is pretty good, but with a bolt on modded car like a few guys here it might do well. The stock dyno would be cool i guess but pretty uneccesary...
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 10:23 PM
  #238  
T_K's Avatar
T_K
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 870
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by 0jiggy0
i honestly dont think anyone with a bone stock car would get this because it would make no sense as a first mod. Pretty sure its been established that the stock one is pretty good, but with a bolt on modded car like a few guys here it might do well. The stock dyno would be cool i guess but pretty uneccesary...
A replacement manifold for the HR won't be to address a choke point. Sure theres probably a few hp to be made by making it more efficient, but the real gains will come from messing with the volume, shape, and the size/shape of the runners.

We aren't going to gain free horsepower like the DE, at least not as much as the old motors did. All the people hoping/wishing for similar gains can pretty much give up on that. We don't have a cylinder filling issue, and if we do, it's not even remotely as big a problem for the HR as it was for the DE.

Any gains seen by an aftermarket manifold, will be to shift the power band by altering resonances. Anyone who wants to see 10hp at peak, will do so by sacrificing some at the bottom. The trick is finding the right design to maximize the area under the curve. Currently peak Volumetric Efficiency is around 5000rpm, the max torque rpm. Changing runner sizes and shape can shift that higher or lower, and it will make gains on any motor, stock or modded, assuming it doesn't hit another mechanical limit e.g. cams being too mild.

TK
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #239  
Coldcat83's Avatar
Coldcat83
New Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Georgia
Default

The 304 SS comment is very true but I would thoroughly enjoy getting the Aluminum since my dad could anodize it any color I would like, sounds corny and not everyone has this option but it would be cheaper and anodizing is not that expensive giving you the color and bling you want without the added weight and lack of color option the 304 SS would give you. This is not an arguement I am just piggy backing off of you reply, and if this already written then I am sorry it is a long thread and I haven't finished reading it yet.



Originally Posted by A.H
304 SS is generally the better option. Aluminum is lighter but that's the only advantage really. Aluminum is also very dull looking metal and doesn't give that "bling" factor. Also, I am 90% sure the 304 SS is better for keeping cooler tempertures. The 304 SS is very shiny as well and if polished correctly can be as reflective as a mirror. And teh 304 SS is always the more expensive and popular choice on aftermarket components. And every exhasut component I buy is always in 304 SS
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 03:45 AM
  #240  
Goku350z2007's Avatar
Goku350z2007
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: Rahway, N.J.
Default

Are they finished tweaking the dyno machine yet? lol Just kidding.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 AM.