Uprev tune on exhaust only HR +20whp
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ajax, On
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Uprev tune on exhaust only HR +20whp
Base before Uprev = 261whp 233wtq
After Uprev tune = 283whp 251wtq
Dynapack dyno
Every car is different but looks like an Uprev tune is good for about 20whp and 20wtq on a basicly stock car. I have a JIC exhaust.
With the stock map my car made 271whp, we found another 12whp after a few map adjustments. There is probably another 8-10whp in it but this is a safe, cool running tune.
My car was tuned at APH in Toronto.
Can't wait to see what 1/4 mile times I can pull now.
After Uprev tune = 283whp 251wtq
Dynapack dyno
Every car is different but looks like an Uprev tune is good for about 20whp and 20wtq on a basicly stock car. I have a JIC exhaust.
With the stock map my car made 271whp, we found another 12whp after a few map adjustments. There is probably another 8-10whp in it but this is a safe, cool running tune.
My car was tuned at APH in Toronto.
Can't wait to see what 1/4 mile times I can pull now.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal 818
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Damn....amazing gains
I'm a little confused though. I have seen other UPrev tunes and nothing this significant in power even though they had many more bolt ons. If i recall, Solo had his car tuned @ Uprev and made 5whp bone stock. A cat-back shouldn't affect things too much, allowing an extra 15whp/wtq to be free'd up from the motor And you would think, the guys that created the software would be able to tune it better than other tuners using thier software.
I'm a little confused though. I have seen other UPrev tunes and nothing this significant in power even though they had many more bolt ons. If i recall, Solo had his car tuned @ Uprev and made 5whp bone stock. A cat-back shouldn't affect things too much, allowing an extra 15whp/wtq to be free'd up from the motor And you would think, the guys that created the software would be able to tune it better than other tuners using thier software.
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Damn....amazing gains
I'm a little confused though. I have seen other UPrev tunes and nothing this significant in power even though they had many more bolt ons. If i recall, Solo had his car tuned @ Uprev and made 5whp bone stock. A cat-back shouldn't affect things too much, allowing an extra 15whp/wtq to be free'd up from the motor And you would think, the guys that created the software would be able to tune it better than other tuners using thier software.
I'm a little confused though. I have seen other UPrev tunes and nothing this significant in power even though they had many more bolt ons. If i recall, Solo had his car tuned @ Uprev and made 5whp bone stock. A cat-back shouldn't affect things too much, allowing an extra 15whp/wtq to be free'd up from the motor And you would think, the guys that created the software would be able to tune it better than other tuners using thier software.
2007-2008 350Z Y Pipe on Right Side:
2007 G35 Y Pipe:
The parts behind the Y Pipe were identical. My guess is Nissan created a fairly optimal base map while maintaining the ability to reuse the exhaust system with minimal changes.
If a bone stock 2007 Sedan can eek out around 10-12whp with an UpRev tune, then the theory is sound.
TK
#13
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ajax, On
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, really nice gains on the top end around 7,250 RPM (looks to be almost 40whp). We couldn't raise the rev limiter though, but there has to be a way to get it up to 7,800. I'll keep you posted.
The key is that this is a safe tune. I track the car (lap days and drag strip) and want to be sure I have a cool and safe running car. Any one can lean out a car and add or remove timing, but to do it safely, that is a different story.
The key is that this is a safe tune. I track the car (lap days and drag strip) and want to be sure I have a cool and safe running car. Any one can lean out a car and add or remove timing, but to do it safely, that is a different story.
#15
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
This is similar to what I saw with my exhaust before and after, I haven't tuned yet.
Stock 260 whp, 233 ft-lbs
After Bassani 271whp, 241 ft-lbs
Lost around 2-6 hp between 2K - 3K rpm, but gain it back +5-11hp across the board the rest of the way.
Sound factor is good for another 5 - 10whp imo also
Stock 260 whp, 233 ft-lbs
After Bassani 271whp, 241 ft-lbs
Lost around 2-6 hp between 2K - 3K rpm, but gain it back +5-11hp across the board the rest of the way.
Sound factor is good for another 5 - 10whp imo also
#16
'12 TL SH-AWD
iTrader: (26)
My dyno is in my sig, and my car just has HFCs and you see where that put me. I dynoed 261 stock with K&N drop ins only on a Dynojet.
Base before Uprev = 261whp 233wtq
After Uprev tune = 283whp 251wtq
Dynapack dyno
Every car is different but looks like an Uprev tune is good for about 20whp and 20wtq on a basicly stock car. I have a JIC exhaust.
With the stock map my car made 271whp, we found another 12whp after a few map adjustments. There is probably another 8-10whp in it but this is a safe, cool running tune.
My car was tuned at APH in Toronto.
Can't wait to see what 1/4 mile times I can pull now.
After Uprev tune = 283whp 251wtq
Dynapack dyno
Every car is different but looks like an Uprev tune is good for about 20whp and 20wtq on a basicly stock car. I have a JIC exhaust.
With the stock map my car made 271whp, we found another 12whp after a few map adjustments. There is probably another 8-10whp in it but this is a safe, cool running tune.
My car was tuned at APH in Toronto.
Can't wait to see what 1/4 mile times I can pull now.
#17
New Member
iTrader: (13)
The HR engine, specifically in the Z, didn't have a lot of development time from Nissan. In the original application, the G35, it was intended for a higher flowing exhaust (dual exhaust). On the Z, the catback system stayed mostly unchanged except a slight change in the Y-Pipe design (most of which was probably borrowed from the G35 Sedan design).
2007-2008 350Z Y Pipe on Right Side:
2007 G35 Y Pipe:
The parts behind the Y Pipe were identical. My guess is Nissan created a fairly optimal base map while maintaining the ability to reuse the exhaust system with minimal changes.
If a bone stock 2007 Sedan can eek out around 10-12whp with an UpRev tune, then the theory is sound.
TK
2007-2008 350Z Y Pipe on Right Side:
2007 G35 Y Pipe:
The parts behind the Y Pipe were identical. My guess is Nissan created a fairly optimal base map while maintaining the ability to reuse the exhaust system with minimal changes.
If a bone stock 2007 Sedan can eek out around 10-12whp with an UpRev tune, then the theory is sound.
TK
#18
'12 TL SH-AWD
iTrader: (26)
Damn....amazing gains
I'm a little confused though. I have seen other UPrev tunes and nothing this significant in power even though they had many more bolt ons. If i recall, Solo had his car tuned @ Uprev and made 5whp bone stock. A cat-back shouldn't affect things too much, allowing an extra 15whp/wtq to be free'd up from the motor And you would think, the guys that created the software would be able to tune it better than other tuners using thier software.
I'm a little confused though. I have seen other UPrev tunes and nothing this significant in power even though they had many more bolt ons. If i recall, Solo had his car tuned @ Uprev and made 5whp bone stock. A cat-back shouldn't affect things too much, allowing an extra 15whp/wtq to be free'd up from the motor And you would think, the guys that created the software would be able to tune it better than other tuners using thier software.
I also track my car and requested the rpm to not be raised, and keep the tune safe.
Last edited by SOLO-350Z; 04-06-2009 at 01:31 PM.
#19
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal 818
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A raised rev limiter doesn't affect how much power you put down on a dyno because in my case my peak hp is around 7000 i believe. And I believe your gains were very good for a stock car and I could see them in the 290s with the exhast and HFC combo. That I don't doubt. I just thought it was odd that a car with just a cat-back gained 20whp from a tune. That's all.
#20
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ajax, On
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A raised rev limiter doesn't affect how much power you put down on a dyno because in my case my peak hp is around 7000 i believe. And I believe your gains were very good for a stock car and I could see them in the 290s with the exhast and HFC combo. That I don't doubt. I just thought it was odd that a car with just a cat-back gained 20whp from a tune. That's all.