Notices
VQ35HR Mods and Support related to the 2007/08 High Revving VQ

VQ40 block swap in VQ35HR Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2009 | 07:40 AM
  #1  
JClaw's Avatar
JClaw
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Qc
Default VQ40 block swap in VQ35HR Z

Looking at a piston speed calculator, the VQ37 has an 86mm stroke, and a 4288 FPS piston speed at 7600 RPM. The VQ40 uses a 92mm stroke and has the same piston speed at 7100.

So if you reduce the RPMS by 500 (say 7000 rev limiter instead of 7500) you achieve the same piston speed as a VQ37 at stock fuel cut.

Could we just swap the 4.0 block and put back the engine in the car with VQ35HR heads-cams-ECU. The stock ECU would still think it is running a stock VQ35HR.

We could take advantage of the better heads and cams of the HR on the 4.0 block since it only has mild cams and a 9.7:1 compression ratio stock.

How high a compression would installing stock VQ35HR heads on a stock VQ40DE block give us? The VQ40 has the same new 6 bolt main tall block design and uses the same transmission bellhousing as the VQ35HR and VQ37HR.

Last edited by JClaw; May 13, 2009 at 09:08 AM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 08:06 AM
  #2  
*Boose*'s Avatar
*Boose*
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD Ellsworth AFB
Default

There already is a 4.0 stroker kit for the Z.

Last edited by *Boose*; May 13, 2009 at 08:10 AM. Reason: Stupidity.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 08:14 AM
  #3  
diablox1's Avatar
diablox1
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 976
Likes: 1
From: CaliFTMFGDW OMFG LMFAO LOL WUT
Default

interesting thread, sub'd
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 08:18 AM
  #4  
cmoose11's Avatar
cmoose11
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: concord, nh
Default

hmmmMMMmmmm i wonder what the dealer would think if i swaped my xterra motor with my Z.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 08:28 AM
  #5  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

you're taking a rather large leap of faith that the heads even bolt up, that deck heights are the same, that piston/valve clearances are remotely in spec. This is dismissing for a second motor mounts lining up, bell housing mounting to the block, clutches/flywheels being compatible, etc.

You're also taking a possible leap of faith that the rod and pistons from the 4.0 are of the same quality as the HR

not to mention, how much power do you think .3 liters of displacement is going to give you? more torque, possibly assuming they bolt together in the first place, depending upon the variants above.

I suspect its one of those things that sounds cooler on paper than it does if it were executed

One more thing...you're now asking your stroked engine to work well with the same cams as it had on a non stroked engine....begs the question of why?

Last edited by Z1 Performance; May 13, 2009 at 08:58 AM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 08:41 AM
  #6  
KS0385's Avatar
KS0385
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 1
From: Boston, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
you're taking a rather large leap of faith that the heads even bolt up, that deck heights are the same, that piston/valve clearances are remotely in spec. This is dismissing for a second motor mounts lining up, bell housing mounting to the block, clutches/flywheels being compatible, etc.

You're also taking a possible leap of faith that the rod and pistons from the 4.0 are of the same quality as the HR

not to mention, how much power do you think .2 liters of displacement is going to give you? more torque, possibly assuming they bolt together in the first place, depending upon the variants above.

I suspect its one of those things that sounds cooler on paper than it does if it were executed

...and back to reality.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 08:55 AM
  #7  
0jiggy0's Avatar
0jiggy0
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 13
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Looks like uve done some decent research. Now it sounds like u need to look at the blocks side by side and see how much of a match it is. Sounds like a very viable option, whethere boost of NA is your idea.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 08:58 AM
  #8  
zman600's Avatar
zman600
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Houston (Sugar Land)
Default

since we have a 4.0 liter stroker that sounds a hell of a lot easier then a full swap
.02
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 09:10 AM
  #9  
JClaw's Avatar
JClaw
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Qc
Default

Originally Posted by NoWin
There already is a 4.0 stroker kit for the Z.
Originally Posted by zman600
since we have a 4.0 liter stroker that sounds a hell of a lot easier then a full swap
.02
Main reason I was posting this is that there are several VQ40DE longblocks available for 300-500$ on www.car-part.com.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 09:19 AM
  #10  
0jiggy0's Avatar
0jiggy0
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 13
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
you're taking a rather large leap of faith that the heads even bolt up, that deck heights are the same, that piston/valve clearances are remotely in spec. This is dismissing for a second motor mounts lining up, bell housing mounting to the block, clutches/flywheels being compatible, etc.

You're also taking a possible leap of faith that the rod and pistons from the 4.0 are of the same quality as the HR

not to mention, how much power do you think .3 liters of displacement is going to give you? more torque, possibly assuming they bolt together in the first place, depending upon the variants above.

I suspect its one of those things that sounds cooler on paper than it does if it were executed

One more thing...you're now asking your stroked engine to work well with the same cams as it had on a non stroked engine....begs the question of why?
Didn't see ur post till after I posted. But I agree on the match ups. Im not sure if op was thinkin of this as a direct bolt on proposition or using the block and changing the internals. I would assume if u were going to do this much work you would up the internals.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 10:36 AM
  #11  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

Originally Posted by zman600
since we have a 4.0 liter stroker that sounds a hell of a lot easier then a full swap
.02
Any pics?

Originally Posted by zman600
o ya my cars
1. 350z
2. el camino 350 big block
3. bmw 328i (project:gut and track kind of thing)
4. 280z tt
Any pics of your 280z tt? What engine swap? What is your BS in and when do you finish your MS? What focus (major)?
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 10:41 AM
  #12  
KingBaby's Avatar
KingBaby
Hardest Setting
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,406
Likes: 130
From: MexiCali dodging potholes
Default

^^^

lol

OP, why don't you try it...sounds good like most said, just need a test mule to excute this theory...
you'd be out $500 probably lose a weekend, but we'd have an answer...
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 06:07 PM
  #13  
Simann's Avatar
Simann
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
you're taking a rather large leap of faith that the heads even bolt up, that deck heights are the same, that piston/valve clearances are remotely in spec. This is dismissing for a second motor mounts lining up, bell housing mounting to the block, clutches/flywheels being compatible, etc.

You're also taking a possible leap of faith that the rod and pistons from the 4.0 are of the same quality as the HR

not to mention, how much power do you think .3 liters of displacement is going to give you? more torque, possibly assuming they bolt together in the first place, depending upon the variants above.

I suspect its one of those things that sounds cooler on paper than it does if it were executed

One more thing...you're now asking your stroked engine to work well with the same cams as it had on a non stroked engine....begs the question of why?

I think the idea sounds fine to me. Nissan has been renown for having interchangeable parts from multiple different motors. It would only be fitting. (pun intended)

This is the same reaction people gave when the debate about the possibility of a 1.5 JZ Frankenstein for Toyota's came to life. (1JZ head on a 2JZ bottom end)

I think its very probable that the motors would share parts.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 02:33 AM
  #14  
*Boose*'s Avatar
*Boose*
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD Ellsworth AFB
Default

For a decent read. Talks about the VQ40 and VQ35. To the OP I only said that the 4.0 stroker kit would be a better option since it's brand new, etc. After you factor in the 350Z's wiring and compare it to the VQ40 it would be alot more than just swapping a block or heads. In my original post before the edit, I mentioned basically to make it work the best way possible. Piggy back ecu, complete wire harness from both vehicles, and you would most likely have to tap and drill holes into the block since I'm sure the 350Z uses more cooling in the heads/block since it's built for track and performance.

http://www.frontyspot.com/frontier/v....php?f=3&t=608
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #15  
sajazzman007's Avatar
sajazzman007
DIY'er Unite
Premier Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
Default

I had this same idea recently for my non rev up. A friend of mine here used to be a big honda guy. He mentioned that most honda engines have the same molding cast to keep the price down for the company. He mentioned that they would swap head with different honda engines. I was calling around today to see if it was a clean swap. I wouldn't know why not really .. I looked at a friends Nissan xtera and engine looks exactly the same. I think the problem would be matching the tranny.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #16  
HKYStormFront's Avatar
HKYStormFront
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 2
From: Greer, SC
Default

it has been mine (and the frontier community in general) that the HR block and the VQ40 block are the same (not the same as the older VQ35DE block, upgraded coolant and oil passages). the heads are also the same from what research i have seen (we've had a few guys take their engines apart so far). also, 350z cams fit in our heads with no modifications. the nismo (and stock Z) thermostat also fits. the pistons are the same size but are a different compression ratio and the rest of the rotating assembly (crank and rods) are where the extra stoke length come from. so if you were to swap in a vq40 "block" it would be the same thing that you already have (again, from what i've heard).what you are looking for is the crank and rods, but as the others have said, buying a proper stroker kit with better rods would be good since while the crankshaft is forged in both the VQ35HR and VQ40DE, the rods are not and are the weaker link and usual suspect when there is internal engine issues
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 09:10 AM
  #17  
tilleys99's Avatar
tilleys99
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Annville, PA
Default

I had the same thoughts as j claw i just picked up a nismo z with bad motor so i have a back up motor with all the parts to make one now i just need to find a vq40, I used too have one in my garage till i had a fire and its almost identical too the vq35hr.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 10:16 AM
  #18  
midz350's Avatar
midz350
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 24
From: around.
Default

so, can I use the stock 4.0 crankshaft with aftermarket pistons and rods from 4.0 stroker kit? that would save alot of $$$
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 07:48 PM
  #19  
Frostydc4's Avatar
Frostydc4
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 18
From: Gilbert, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by HKYStormFront
the heads are also the same from what research i have seen (we've had a few guys take their engines apart so far). also, 350z cams fit in our heads with no modifications.
Which heads are the same? The VQ40 and the HR or the VQ40 and the DE?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #20  
k6750gsxr's Avatar
k6750gsxr
New Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 1
From: Tampa,Fl
Default

Originally Posted by midz350
so, can I use the stock 4.0 crankshaft with aftermarket pistons and rods from 4.0 stroker kit? that would save alot of $$$
i might be going off topic here a little but honda guys have been doing this for years. taking a b20 crank and putting it into a b18 block and creating a stoked motor for less $$$$$
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:24 PM.