Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

Why only 235 for a supercar front tire size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 05:30 PM
  #1  
jgsm's Avatar
jgsm
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Taiwan
Default Why only 235 for a supercar front tire size?

I looked at some supercar spec and their tire size and I found that for rear tire they are all super huge which is very understandable but for front tire most are 235 and 245 and not too many are larger than 245. So what is the rationale behind this not too wide for front tire thing? Everything else the same, isn't it the wider the better? What is the good and bad for a very wide front tire?

Allen
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:28 PM
  #2  
GY-Z's Avatar
GY-Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
From: Canada B.C.
Default

its not neccessary the wider the better, but widder tire usually give you a better traction, but it also slows you down on the straight.

it really depends on what car you checked, if the tendecy of the car is toward oversteer, the stagger(ie small tire up front and fat tires at the rear) setup is very understandable.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:03 PM
  #3  
nicolaycastro's Avatar
nicolaycastro
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Miami - FL
Default

i might think another reason is because the fron tire needs to turn, so 235 could be somewhat the largest you could go without rubbing unless you have adapters or spacers...
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:35 PM
  #4  
al503's Avatar
al503
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Portland Oregon
Default

As has been mentioned, the wider the tire, the more aerodynamic drag. In supercars, some of the bragging rights comes from the top speed capability.

You also have to remember that many supercars have a mid mount or a rear mounted engine. There is much more weight in the rear and you need extra rubber to keep things from getting too squirrely (spelling?).
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:43 PM
  #5  
PhoenixINX's Avatar
PhoenixINX
New Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally posted by nicolaycastro
i might think another reason is because the fron tire needs to turn, so 235 could be somewhat the largest you could go without rubbing unless you have adapters or spacers...
Wrong.

275s fit beautifully... even VERY lowered.

Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 09:38 PM
  #6  
jgsm's Avatar
jgsm
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Taiwan
Default

Take Ferrari Modena 360 as an example, it is a V8 with 400 hp capable of 0-62 mph 4.2 sec but it only comes with front 215/45-18 (rear 275/40-18). Doesn't 215 just sound very small? It is smaller than what everyone have on this board.

Allen
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 11:32 PM
  #7  
EnthuZiast's Avatar
EnthuZiast
Guess whose back, back again...
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

I run 245 all the way around on my Z.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 07:05 AM
  #8  
jimster716's Avatar
jimster716
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default

You have to remember what al503 said about weight distribution. Mid and rear engine cars typically have much smaller tires up front (a la 360, nsx, and 911). Another reason for smaller front tires has nothing to do with performance it has to do with liability. Smaller front tires tends to induce understeer...a safer condition for the average driver than neutral or oversteer (no OEM wants to build a car that a lawyer can accuse of intentionally making it dangerous).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pleask
Maintenance & Repair
22
Dec 21, 2021 03:17 PM
Dark Knight
Wheels Tires
7
Nov 11, 2015 08:40 PM
kyin
New Owners
12
Oct 15, 2015 05:54 AM
samansharif
Brakes & Suspension
1
Sep 25, 2015 12:31 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:45 AM.