Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

True or False? Need Your Input

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2006 | 01:31 PM
  #1  
onebadfyvo's Avatar
onebadfyvo
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default True or False? Need Your Input

After putting on my 5Zigen FN01R-C (18" staggered), the negative camber on my rear wheels became more apparent. My suspension is stock for now.

I went to Big O Tires to get a four wheel alignment, but the rear wheels still have the negative camber which is clearly visible when viewing my car from the rear.

After the alignment was suppose to have been done, I called the techcician's attention to the negative camber that was STILL visible. The tech said, and I quote, "Nissan's spec camber for the rears are 1.1 degree negative camber for performance purposes" There's about 1.5" on the outside part of the tread that's not touching the ground. I asked the tech if they can go 0 degree of camber. The tech comes back, "Ya, we can do it if you want a bad ride"

My ??: Was the tech right about the negative camber? Is it true that Nissan put this negative camber as STOCK set-up? Remember, my suspension is stock (for now).

Thanks for any input you fellas can give me.
Old 01-29-2006 | 01:39 PM
  #2  
Mr.Jadkowski's Avatar
Mr.Jadkowski
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Savannah, GA
Default

That's true. I think the maximum is 1.5 degrees negative, minimum is 0 degrees. I'm not sure what the optimal is.
Old 01-29-2006 | 01:40 PM
  #3  
Rickdogg's Avatar
Rickdogg
Out of hiatus
Premier Member
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,759
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: My350z
Default

Yes, stock has a slight negative camber. You do not want 0 camber unless you are drag racing. Your handling will suffer dramatically as well
Old 01-29-2006 | 01:43 PM
  #4  
OvaYahead's Avatar
OvaYahead
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: CA
Default

the tech is correct on all accounts. You don't want zero camber in the rear. Even if I only drove straight all day long I don't think I would want zero camber.
Old 01-29-2006 | 01:48 PM
  #5  
onebadfyvo's Avatar
onebadfyvo
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks fellas. The input given makes me feel a ton better. Oh ya, as usual, I received numerous compliments on the Z while it was being worked on, and afterwards when it was driven to a parking stall. Thanks again guys!!
Old 01-29-2006 | 03:52 PM
  #6  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Alignment may look unusual when the car is siting because the alignment is static. What the tires do when the car is moving is a different story (and more important). Keep an eye on unusual tire wear.
Old 01-29-2006 | 06:03 PM
  #7  
knight_white99's Avatar
knight_white99
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

What camber you want depends on what kind of driving that you do. If you auto-cross or track the car, you will likely want as much negative camber as you can get. For street driving, go with the factory specs.
Old 01-29-2006 | 09:56 PM
  #8  
onebadfyvo's Avatar
onebadfyvo
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davidv
Alignment may look unusual when the car is siting because the alignment is static. What the tires do when the car is moving is a different story (and more important). Keep an eye on unusual tire wear.
I will definately keep an eye out for the tread wear. As I mentioned, the outer portion. about an inch, of the tire seems like it's not touching the ground, which will make the inside portion of the tire wear faster. I make enough $$ to have bought my Z, but I sure don't wanna throw it away by buying rear tires NEEDLESSLY.

Thanx again Fellas for the useful info.
Old 01-31-2006 | 07:54 PM
  #9  
Arnie's Avatar
Arnie
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, Tx.
Default

Originally Posted by OvaYahead
the tech is correct on all accounts. You don't want zero camber in the rear. Even if I only drove straight all day long I don't think I would want zero camber.
Why is it that you would not want zero camber in the (imaginary) case of driving straight all day long?
Old 01-31-2006 | 08:33 PM
  #10  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Yeah, the outside of my tread doesn't like to touch the ground much either. But note, that is while sitting still. In corners, that floating patch will be like backup traction. I even lowered the pressure a bit in the rear to get a slightly bigger contact patch, I think I'm running 28psi right now in the back.
Old 02-16-2006 | 02:30 PM
  #11  
turbohappy's Avatar
turbohappy
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Indiana
Default

You definitely would want 0 camber if you drove straight all day long.

Having some negative camber in the rear actually helps the car maintain a street-safe amount of understeer.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XM 1
Engine & Drivetrain
29
07-10-2022 07:44 AM
lolwatbro
Maintenance & Repair
9
10-09-2021 04:58 AM
MicVelo
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
34
05-30-2017 03:28 PM
hulkout
370Z Brakes & Suspension
7
04-28-2017 09:00 PM
Dymsi
Exterior & Interior
14
09-29-2015 11:32 AM



Quick Reply: True or False? Need Your Input



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:45 PM.