Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

5Zigen FN01R-C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 01:01 PM
  #1  
hazmat's Avatar
hazmat
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert AZ
Default 5Zigen FN01R-C

I really like the 5Zigen FN01R-C and decided to with 17" for various reasons

anyway, do any of you see a problem with this setup:
FRONT 17x8 +35mm offset or 17x8 +25mm offset
BACK 17x9 + 25mm offset or 17x8 +25mm offset

which combination is the best and is not goofy looking...
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 01:24 PM
  #2  
jimster716's Avatar
jimster716
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default

17x9 +20 or +35 front
17x10 +25 rear

The 8 and 9" widths will look too tucked in.

I have 18x9.5 +22 front and rear for my track set.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #3  
CrazyMike's Avatar
CrazyMike
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Default

I have the 17x8 with +25 offset for all four. I wouldn't go with the +35 offset - not sure if you have brembos or not, but the +35 offset might hit the calipers on the 17x8 size. For you, I'd recommend going 17x9 +20 for all four wheels, or put the 17x10 +25 in the rear with the 17x9 +20 up front (BTW - I just looked on the 5zigen site - they don't list a 17x9 with a +25 offset). The only reason I chose the 8" rims was to be STX legal in autox; I run all four tires the same size - 245/45/17.

Here's a few pictures of my car with the FNO1R-C's:

http://crazymike1.smugmug.com/photos/31590118-L.jpg
http://crazymike1.smugmug.com/photos/31590117-L.jpg
http://crazymike1.smugmug.com/photos/30693664-L.jpg

Last edited by CrazyMike; Feb 6, 2006 at 02:05 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 02:37 PM
  #4  
hazmat's Avatar
hazmat
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert AZ
Default

Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 04:38 PM
  #5  
ppw350Zunit's Avatar
ppw350Zunit
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by jimster716
17x9 +20 or +35 front
17x10 +25 rear

The 8 and 9" widths will look too tucked in.

I have 18x9.5 +22 front and rear for my track set.
the 17x9 +20 offset is ONLY available in 4-lugs. you will have to go with 17x9 +15, which i prefer, or 17x9 +35, which will look a little bit more sucken in.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #6  
BlackSpec02's Avatar
BlackSpec02
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

yeah i say 17X9 all around or 17X9 front and 17X10 rear.

17 would be for max performance, but 18's might look better if they come in that size.

How much do these wheels run?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #7  
CrazyMike's Avatar
CrazyMike
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by ppw350Zunit
the 17x9 +20 offset is ONLY available in 4-lugs. you will have to go with 17x9 +15, which i prefer, or 17x9 +35, which will look a little bit more sucken in.
Yep - my mistake! I saw the 114.3 but missed the '4' in front of it! IIRC, the stock offset is 30mm.

Some food for thought:

If you got the 17x9 with the +35 you'd be closer to stock offsets (assuming 30mm) but the outer edge of the rim would still stick out 7.5mm more than a stock 8" rim with +30 offset. Assuming this doesn't cause any clearance issues on the inside of the tire, I'd opt for this option since it will put less stress on the front axle compared to the +15.

The +15 option will stick out 27.5mm more than stock on the outer edge and your centerline of the wheel will be pushed out by 15 mm from stock, which will add some stress to the front axles. It probably isn't too much for the axle to handle, but you should know these facts before you make any decisions.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 03:15 PM
  #8  
cwalker's Avatar
cwalker
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
Default

How much do the FN01R-C's (17x9 +35) actually weigh? Their site says 19-20 lbs, but edgeracing.com lists them as 17.5 lbs. Can anyone confirm?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #9  
Rickdogg's Avatar
Rickdogg
Out of hiatus
Premier Member
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,759
Likes: 4
From: My350z
Default

Originally Posted by cwalker
How much do the FN01R-C's (17x9 +35) actually weigh? Their site says 19-20 lbs, but edgeracing.com lists them as 17.5 lbs. Can anyone confirm?
Best thing to do is call the source directly
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 02:52 AM
  #10  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by cwalker
How much do the FN01R-C's (17x9 +35) actually weigh? Their site says 19-20 lbs, but edgeracing.com lists them as 17.5 lbs. Can anyone confirm?
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....78#post2151378

Originally Posted by Kolia
I've weighted mine on my home scale. Note sure of the reliability...

17x9 +35 --> 20.0lb
17x10 +35 --> 21.6lb
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #11  
Auto RnD's Avatar
Auto RnD
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Milpitas, CA.
Default

you can run a 17x9 +15 and a 17x10 +25
and it will look just fine.

We can get you 5zigen fno1rc at a great price.
call for details
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
John@Victory
Drag
21
Mar 17, 2005 10:28 AM
Wicked350
Brakes & Suspension
1
Feb 4, 2005 09:53 AM
del105
Autocross/Road
17
Dec 8, 2004 05:37 AM
sfarrah
Wheels & Tires
8
Oct 22, 2004 11:27 AM
jimster716
Wheels & Tires
14
Mar 6, 2004 05:05 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:26 AM.