Just FYI 9.5 LMGT4's + 295/35/18 tires up front
#1
Just FYI 9.5 LMGT4's + 295/35/18 tires up front
I just put on a set of 18x9.5 et30 LMGT4's with 295/35/18 Kumho MX tires on the front of my car without rubbing(although it's damn close). I've got 2.6 degrees of negative front camber and could probably get away with a 5mm spacer.
#7
I drove it fairly hard on the way to work this morning through the back roads and not a single VDC issue. It's only a 26.1" tall tire so I didn't expect any interference anyway.
This is actually just temporary. I will be replacing all the tires with 255/40 RT-615's in the next few days. After driving with these this morning I can say that the Kumho MX's are LOUD! It sounds like a steam roller, tons of road noise compared to the Bridgestones. I can say that turn in response is way up!
These Kumho MX's must run small, because their actual width is just a hair wider than the Bridgestone 275/40's. The 255/40 RT-615's I have are just a little bit narrower than the Bridgestone RE050A 275/40's.
This is actually just temporary. I will be replacing all the tires with 255/40 RT-615's in the next few days. After driving with these this morning I can say that the Kumho MX's are LOUD! It sounds like a steam roller, tons of road noise compared to the Bridgestones. I can say that turn in response is way up!
These Kumho MX's must run small, because their actual width is just a hair wider than the Bridgestone 275/40's. The 255/40 RT-615's I have are just a little bit narrower than the Bridgestone RE050A 275/40's.
Last edited by Nihilation; 05-04-2007 at 05:37 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nihilation
...These Kumho MX's must run small, because their actual width is just a hair wider than the Bridgestone 275/40's. The 255/40 RT-615's I have are just a little bit narrower than the Bridgestone RE050A 275/40's.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post