Nitrogen filled tires - FTMFW!!!
#1
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nitrogen filled tires - FTMFW!!!
I switched from air to nitrogen in my tires September of last year. Specs:
'03 G coupe, automatic, currently 87k miles
headers
true dual exhaust
3.5 vlsd pumpkin swap
I religiously check my mileage. Everytime I fill up, I check my mpg. Before switching to nitrogen, I would get 17-19 mpg combined city/hwy, and 22 mpg all highway.
The day after I had nitrogen put in, I drove to Atlanta, about 7-8 hours drive. All highway, I got just over 26 mpg. No BS. This was driving during the day, with the A/C running all day long, cruise set to 73 mph (anything over that and the cruise will kick off because of the different gear ratio).
The first thing I noticed as soon as I drove the car was that small, harsh bumps in the road did not feel quite as harsh as before. This was not something I was told about prior to getting nitrogen put in nor something I would have expected, so I know it is not a placebo effect. Speaking with other people who have recently switched to nitrogen, they told me they experienced the same thing.
As far as longer tire life - I don't know yet. I just switched tires 3 weeks ago, but I got about 22k miles out of my previous Nitto NT555, and they still had quite a bit of tread left on them when removed (I changed them because their wet traction is teh suck).
As far as combined city/hwy, I get about 20-21 mpg, depending on how much city and how much hwy driving is involved. I just drove from MS to Corpus Christi, TX today. I got 427 miles on my first tank, having to stop in Houston to fill up. It was only 16.15 gals when I filled up, so I could have easily gotten over 450 miles on one tank. I got 26.44 mpg on this tank. Keep in mind this is on an auto with a lower gear ratio - I'm turing 2700 RPMs at 70 mph. A regular (3.3) diff on an auto may get you slightly better mpg, but ymmv.
I am not a physicist, and I am not going to do your research for you. If you don't know how or why nitrogen does better than air, then is your friend. If you just want to talk trash about this being a gimmick, then you, my friend, are sadly mistaken. I have been running nitrogen for almost a year before I made any judgement, but my results have been consistent each and every time I check my mileage, and they are consistent with what other people I've spoken with who made the switch have observed.
'03 G coupe, automatic, currently 87k miles
headers
true dual exhaust
3.5 vlsd pumpkin swap
I religiously check my mileage. Everytime I fill up, I check my mpg. Before switching to nitrogen, I would get 17-19 mpg combined city/hwy, and 22 mpg all highway.
The day after I had nitrogen put in, I drove to Atlanta, about 7-8 hours drive. All highway, I got just over 26 mpg. No BS. This was driving during the day, with the A/C running all day long, cruise set to 73 mph (anything over that and the cruise will kick off because of the different gear ratio).
The first thing I noticed as soon as I drove the car was that small, harsh bumps in the road did not feel quite as harsh as before. This was not something I was told about prior to getting nitrogen put in nor something I would have expected, so I know it is not a placebo effect. Speaking with other people who have recently switched to nitrogen, they told me they experienced the same thing.
As far as longer tire life - I don't know yet. I just switched tires 3 weeks ago, but I got about 22k miles out of my previous Nitto NT555, and they still had quite a bit of tread left on them when removed (I changed them because their wet traction is teh suck).
As far as combined city/hwy, I get about 20-21 mpg, depending on how much city and how much hwy driving is involved. I just drove from MS to Corpus Christi, TX today. I got 427 miles on my first tank, having to stop in Houston to fill up. It was only 16.15 gals when I filled up, so I could have easily gotten over 450 miles on one tank. I got 26.44 mpg on this tank. Keep in mind this is on an auto with a lower gear ratio - I'm turing 2700 RPMs at 70 mph. A regular (3.3) diff on an auto may get you slightly better mpg, but ymmv.
I am not a physicist, and I am not going to do your research for you. If you don't know how or why nitrogen does better than air, then is your friend. If you just want to talk trash about this being a gimmick, then you, my friend, are sadly mistaken. I have been running nitrogen for almost a year before I made any judgement, but my results have been consistent each and every time I check my mileage, and they are consistent with what other people I've spoken with who made the switch have observed.
#3
New Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How good were you before nitrogen about checking your tire pressure regularly? I can see you having more consistent #'s over a long period of time with N but that's about it. It's not going to improve mpg all that much unless you were under-inflated previously.
#5
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ANXIOUZ
How good were you before nitrogen about checking your tire pressure regularly? I can see you having more consistent #'s over a long period of time with N but that's about it. It's not going to improve mpg all that much unless you were under-inflated previously.
#6
New Member
iTrader: (51)
Nitrogen is BS. Air is 78% nitrogen. When you get your tires mounted the volume of the tire is fileld with air. Unless you pull all the air out of the tire with vacuum then you already have one atmosphere of air in there which will mix with the nitrogen fill anyway.
Last edited by JETPILOT; 05-31-2008 at 09:52 PM.
#7
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JETPILOT
Nitrogen is BS. Air is 78% nitrogen.
Trending Topics
#8
New Member
iTrader: (51)
High altitude airplane tires are filled with nitrogen due to the temperature extremes high altitude airplane tires see. Nitrogen does not expand or contract very much with temperature change. So When I descend from 36,000 feet where the air in my tires is approx -40F my tires have the correct pressure on landing. The air in the tire will not get warm enough during my descent for the tire to be at operating pressure when I land if I used air. In addition. When I land my tire temps shoot up from friction, and brake heat. Again with nitrogen my pressure won't change in any meaningful way. The temp changes seen in street car does not warrant the use of nitrogen. It's a waste of money. All marketing. Sorry!
Last edited by JETPILOT; 05-31-2008 at 10:11 PM.
#11
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JETPILOT
High altitude airplane tires are filled with nitrogen due to the temperature extremes high altitude airplane tires see. Nitrogen does not expand or contract very much with temperature change. So When I descend from 36,000 feet where the air in my tires is approx -40F my tires have the correct pressure on landing. The air in the tire will not get warm enough during my descent for the tire to be at operating pressure when I land if I used air. In addition. When I land my tire temps shoot up from friction, and brake heat. Again with nitrogen my pressure won't change in any meaningful way. The temp changes seen in car does does not warrant the use of nitrogen. It's a waste of money. All marketing. Sorry!
I can't tell you how many pilots (I'm in Army Aviation maintenance) have no clue, nor care, why some basic maintenance items are performed on "their" choppers.
Maybe some other people can chime in on this who have made the switch. Like I said, I'm posting my personal results that I've studied for about two years. I know there are varying opinions, and that's good. I'm not here to try to convince anybody of anything.
Anyway it's time for bed. I'll check back tomorrow.
#14
New Member
iTrader: (51)
I however do see a good use for nitrogen in race cars where you also want to keep optimum tire pressure which will not change when the tire heats up to operating temp from friction and brake heat. But for street cars I just don't see any advantage.
In order to get a good fill of nitrogen for your track tires pull the valve out of the stem and fill the tire with nitrogen after mounting. Let the nitrogen out of the tire. Do this twice. Reinstall the valve in the stem and fill the final time with nitrogen. This will purge the vast majority of air for a good fill of nitrogen.
In order to get a good fill of nitrogen for your track tires pull the valve out of the stem and fill the tire with nitrogen after mounting. Let the nitrogen out of the tire. Do this twice. Reinstall the valve in the stem and fill the final time with nitrogen. This will purge the vast majority of air for a good fill of nitrogen.
Last edited by JETPILOT; 05-31-2008 at 11:34 PM.
#17
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dTor
This was not something I was told about prior to getting nitrogen put in nor something I would have expected, so I know it is not a placebo effect.
A placebo effect occurs when you were not told about it. So in fact, it was a placebo.
While I don't believe in your actual findings, I believe in a good placebo.
You may subconsciously drive slower than before, causing the mileage to improve. There are also many other factors that come into play..
Also, it's been scientifically proven that placebos work, not in its own capacity but coupled with the positive reinforcement of the mind and subconscious efforts, the effect produces positive results. i.e. cancer patients who take glucose pills and were not told what they were, believed that they were getting better and considered these tables to be miracle pills. Drawing from very basic knowledge of oncology, we know that there's no direct relationship between glucose tablets and reduction of cancer cells.
Placebo effect.
#19
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by JETPILOT
In order to get a good fill of nitrogen for your track tires pull the valve out of the stem and fill the tire with nitrogen after mounting. Let the nitrogen out of the tire. Do this twice. Reinstall the valve in the stem and fill the final time with nitrogen. This will purge the vast majority of air for a good fill of nitrogen.
#20
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by badkarma85
It cannot possibly be a placebo if you were told about it, so your argument is wrong.
A placebo effect occurs when you were not told about it. So in fact, it was a placebo.
While I don't believe in your actual findings, I believe in a good placebo.
You may subconsciously drive slower than before, causing the mileage to improve. There are also many other factors that come into play..
Also, it's been scientifically proven that placebos work, not in its own capacity but coupled with the positive reinforcement of the mind and subconscious efforts, the effect produces positive results. i.e. cancer patients who take glucose pills and were not told what they were, believed that they were getting better and considered these tables to be miracle pills. Drawing from very basic knowledge of oncology, we know that there's no direct relationship between glucose tablets and reduction of cancer cells.
Placebo effect.
A placebo effect occurs when you were not told about it. So in fact, it was a placebo.
While I don't believe in your actual findings, I believe in a good placebo.
You may subconsciously drive slower than before, causing the mileage to improve. There are also many other factors that come into play..
Also, it's been scientifically proven that placebos work, not in its own capacity but coupled with the positive reinforcement of the mind and subconscious efforts, the effect produces positive results. i.e. cancer patients who take glucose pills and were not told what they were, believed that they were getting better and considered these tables to be miracle pills. Drawing from very basic knowledge of oncology, we know that there's no direct relationship between glucose tablets and reduction of cancer cells.
Placebo effect.