Offset for flushing 19"TE37 9.5 and 10.5 on 350z
06-10-2008, 04:05 AM
#2
Banned
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Concord, North Carolina
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fwiw I'm running 8.5 and 9.5 te37's with +22 all the way around. If I could change it I would do +20 all the way around and I think that would put them pretty close to flush
06-10-2008, 04:06 AM
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DanielW
fwiw I'm running 8.5 and 9.5 te37's with +22 all the way around. If I could change it I would do +20 all the way around and I think that would put them pretty close to flush
But that is for 8.5 and 9.5? does 9.5 and 10.5 does the flushing? Anyone?
Trending Topics
06-10-2008, 06:19 AM
#8
a 9.5 +22 and a 10.5 +20 is flush, but not 'aggressive'.
an aggressive offset would be +15 or thereabouts. you can see pictures of the Enkei RPF01 to see this fitment since it is very common.
and you do NOT have to roll your fenders for +22 fitment or +20 fitment.
an aggressive offset would be +15 or thereabouts. you can see pictures of the Enkei RPF01 to see this fitment since it is very common.
and you do NOT have to roll your fenders for +22 fitment or +20 fitment.
06-10-2008, 06:50 AM
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i am running 9.5/10.5 +22 and lowered 1" all around.
my advice would be to run 255/35/19 front and 275/35/19 rear... going 285 rear, you may have to roll the rear guards
my advice would be to run 255/35/19 front and 275/35/19 rear... going 285 rear, you may have to roll the rear guards
06-10-2008, 07:50 AM
#13
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i havem... +22 all around... i wish i had gotten +12 in the front!!! dont make the same mistake i did! (and a ton of other people on this forum)
+12 in the front gets you get a really nice lip. ive seen pictures of this and it looks fantastic!
+12 in the front gets you get a really nice lip. ive seen pictures of this and it looks fantastic!
06-10-2008, 08:39 AM
#14
Registered User
iTrader: (-2)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: So Cal__Wii Wii Land
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i need to post pics of my TE37s Time attacks. Still havent seen anyone with offsets as low as mine.
9.5/10.5 +22 but running 15mm project kics on all 4 corners +7 all around. i'll get some pics up and my car is super slammed.
9.5/10.5 +22 but running 15mm project kics on all 4 corners +7 all around. i'll get some pics up and my car is super slammed.
06-10-2008, 01:28 PM
#18
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by helldorado
As long as you don't go with more than a 275, possibly 285 tire in the rear.
This is a 10.5" rear +22.
This is a 10.5" rear +22.
Thanks for the 10.5 +22 pic! Thanks everybody for your input. The rims are really expensive and I wish to do it right first time.
Ok, since most agree with 10.5 for rear with the flushness I will go for that on the rear.
What about the front? Some regretted 9.5 +22 and should have gotten 9.5 +12? Anyone has a pic of 9.5 +22 vs +12 would be very helpful.
06-10-2008, 03:44 PM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: norcal
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
won't front wheel spacers push the wheel outward, thus affect the turning scrub radius? going wider on the rims are a wiser choice if you ask me. sure, more expensive.