Review of A-Arm for less tyre wear
I read about
Cusco A-Arm
Kinetix A-Arm
So far, the read of Kinetix seems to be better for reducing tyre wear. Anyone has any other good recommendation?
Thanks in Adv.
Cusco A-Arm
Kinetix A-Arm
So far, the read of Kinetix seems to be better for reducing tyre wear. Anyone has any other good recommendation?
Thanks in Adv.
Don't go with Kinetix! I hate to knock any brand, but I have my reasons. (Cars been sitting in garage for like a month now due to the evil little a-arm)
So far I have not shortlisted Cusco as I am told that it don't allow positive camber adjustment.
Kinetix is the one I have shortlisted as it is rather affordable and has ready stock.
Can someone comment about SPC?
I know some of you right now are thinking, "man this idiot cross threaded or over tightened". I don't blame you for thinking it but it's not true. The tollerances b/w the nut and ball joint's bolt were way to close. It was like screwing on a lock nut that was like the strongest lock nut ever, even when the arms were new.
Ok, sorry I know I'm rambling. Other reason these arms may not be a good choice is the fact that if you're car is lowered enough (I'm 1.5"), you have to run a certain amount of negative camber just to keep the a-arms ball joint from rubbing the upper fender. In fact, if I would have tried to run like -1 camber (been running -1.8) when I first installed them, they would have probably bent my upper/outer fender.
SPC is a good choice.
Trending Topics
I'm glad you brought that up JETPILOT. I'll be purchasing a set in the next week or two. Also, they are on sale right now. They are probably the best of the best guys.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM








