Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

Is the 8.5/9.5 setup dead? Was it ever alive?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2010 | 08:34 AM
  #1  
HotZauce's Avatar
HotZauce
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Default Is the 8.5/9.5 setup dead? Was it ever alive?

I recently hit a large pothole , leaving a couple big dents in my SF-Challenges. I originally bought the wheels back in early 2006. I seem to remember back then that 8.5/9.5 was a pretty common setup. Mine were 19x8.5 +21, 19x9.5 +23 with 245/35 275/35 tires. I was always pretty happy with the way they looked and handled.

Anyways, I'm thinking about trying something new and it seems like nobody runs these sizes anymore. Am I just imagining that this was a good setup? Is everybody with 9.5/10.5 having to roll the fenders?
Old 08-26-2010 | 08:45 AM
  #2  
Highway Riding's Avatar
Highway Riding
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 95
From: Out on the Highway!
Default

Originally Posted by HotZauce
I recently hit a large pothole , leaving a couple big dents in my SF-Challenges. I originally bought the wheels back in early 2006. I seem to remember back then that 8.5/9.5 was a pretty common setup. Mine were 19x8.5 +21, 19x9.5 +23 with 245/35 275/35 tires. I was always pretty happy with the way they looked and handled.

Anyways, I'm thinking about trying something new and it seems like nobody runs these sizes anymore. Am I just imagining that this was a good setup? Is everybody with 9.5/10.5 having to roll the fenders?
The mentioned setup IMHO is great for High/top speed driving. The 9.5/10.5 setup is great for looks and better grip by using larger tires. But generally speaking u don't see high speed cars setup with bulging wheels and tires. I myself have 8.5 front with a 10.5 rear no pull or roll and wouldn't mind a little poke.. The 9.5/10.5 does look the best
Old 08-26-2010 | 09:39 AM
  #3  
hwcustoms's Avatar
hwcustoms
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Default

The most common setup is 9.5/10.5 with a +22 offset.

Now people are starting to go more aggresive on the Z with a 9.5/10.5 with a +12 offset.

Just a matter of taste, but either way both those setups look great.
Old 08-26-2010 | 12:46 PM
  #4  
bmccann101's Avatar
bmccann101
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,246
Likes: 414
From: Scottsdale/coyote drophouse
Default wheels

10.5 doesnt need a roll unless the offset is wrong.
remember that most set ups offered for 350z that uses 10.5 in the rear still has the proper offset to have enuff wheel moved out to the fender lip, but most likely has more offset towards the hub side of the wheel. Ie it sticks OUT a touch farther, but theres just more tire meat in the wheel well.

ANd yeah8.5x9.5 is dead. No point, tire prices are still good for wider wheels, etc.

And they all still fit the same cars.. even my 06 LEx GS300 4 dr sedan mom mobile has 20x9 and 20x10.5 on it.
Old 08-26-2010 | 02:06 PM
  #5  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Instead of debating that is and what is not in fashion how about making a selection to fit your needs?
Old 08-26-2010 | 02:44 PM
  #6  
HotZauce's Avatar
HotZauce
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

I am making a selection to fit my needs. I'm just wondering about the pros and cons of moving to a wider setup. I don't need more tire than I already have, so unless I'm going after a certain look then I guess it doesn't really matter.

I just find it interesting how everyone wants the extreme flush look. Maybe I'm just getting old.
Old 08-26-2010 | 02:55 PM
  #7  
TSG-Z's Avatar
TSG-Z
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC but from 757
Default

I would agree with the 8.5/9.5 being dead. Now folks are going with the hellaflush/poke look that in most cases looks fuking retarded!
Old 08-26-2010 | 02:57 PM
  #8  
Ruthless18x's Avatar
Ruthless18x
Registered User
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 6
From: My Self Created Hell
Default

It's not dead for n/a track guys.
Old 08-26-2010 | 06:41 PM
  #9  
GeauxLadyZ's Avatar
GeauxLadyZ
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,798
Likes: 3
From: Htown
Default

I used to have a 8.5 et.20 9.5 et.25 setup on mine. Now i have 9.5 et.17 10.5 et.18 setup.

That being said, the car was a fair amount lighter on its feet with the thinner setup, and turning was much easier and more managable on the fly. So like others said, its not dead, it just depends on your needs.

If your into looks, go wide. If your into function, thinner is better.
Old 08-26-2010 | 11:20 PM
  #10  
terrasmak's Avatar
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 28,793
Likes: 2,334
From: Sin City
Default

Originally Posted by Ruthless18x
It's not dead for n/a track guys.
Yes it is, 9 inch minimum up front to get some nice 265 or 275's.
Old 08-27-2010 | 04:54 AM
  #11  
Flo-ridaZ33's Avatar
Flo-ridaZ33
New Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 73
From: Miami
Default

Originally Posted by hwcustoms
The most common setup is 9.5/10.5 with a +22 offset.

Now people are starting to go more aggresive on the Z with a 9.5/10.5 with a +12 offset.

Just a matter of taste, but either way both those setups look great.
Yea def... I had BBS RGR's in 19x8.5 +18 and 19x9.5 +22, now my track wheels are 18x9.5/18x10.5.
Old 08-27-2010 | 05:31 AM
  #12  
GeauxLadyZ's Avatar
GeauxLadyZ
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,798
Likes: 3
From: Htown
Default

Originally Posted by terrasmak
Yes it is, 9 inch minimum up front to get some nice 265 or 275's.
Why would track guys want so much understeer and more rotational mass on the dead wheels in front?
Old 08-27-2010 | 05:59 AM
  #13  
terrasmak's Avatar
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 28,793
Likes: 2,334
From: Sin City
Default

Originally Posted by GeauxLadyZ
Why would track guys want so much understeer and more rotational mass on the dead wheels in front?
Understeer? Thats what were getting rid of with running wider front tires.
Old 08-27-2010 | 06:05 AM
  #14  
AcidJake75's Avatar
AcidJake75
Living in 350Z
Premier Member
iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

^^^+1 - running 275s all around for auto-x...on r comps..
Old 08-27-2010 | 06:06 AM
  #15  
noodleman's Avatar
noodleman
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by bmccann101
10.5 doesnt need a roll unless the offset is wrong.
more like if you don't need a roll then the offset is "wrong". Flush is right!

and yea, for street driving, 8.5/9.5 is dead. wider stance looks too good and it's so easy to fit wide rims in our fenders.
Old 08-27-2010 | 06:30 AM
  #16  
HotZauce's Avatar
HotZauce
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by GeauxLadyZ
I used to have a 8.5 et.20 9.5 et.25 setup on mine. Now i have 9.5 et.17 10.5 et.18 setup.

That being said, the car was a fair amount lighter on its feet with the thinner setup, and turning was much easier and more managable on the fly. So like others said, its not dead, it just depends on your needs.

If your into looks, go wide. If your into function, thinner is better.
This is some great feedback. I really wondered how the handling would change with the wider wheel. Probably because of the additional mass, not the width though right? Or did you go up in tire width as well?

Originally Posted by TSG-Z
I would agree with the 8.5/9.5 being dead. Now folks are going with the hellaflush/poke look that in most cases looks fuking retarded!
Personally, it needs to drive well and look good. But I just don't know how the extreme flush setup is to drive since I've never tried it. Maybe it doesn't make much of a difference?
Old 08-27-2010 | 06:59 AM
  #17  
srsairbags's Avatar
srsairbags
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 427
Likes: 1
From: Austin TX
Question

Originally Posted by GeauxLadyZ
I used to have a 8.5 et.20 9.5 et.25 setup on mine. Now i have 9.5 et.17 10.5 et.18 setup.

That being said, the car was a fair amount lighter on its feet with the thinner setup, and turning was much easier and more managable on the fly. So like others said, its not dead, it just depends on your needs.

If your into looks, go wide. If your into function, thinner is better.
hmmm . . i have a noob question(s) . . . why did you go to a 17F, 18R setup ? is it for the track ? what are the advantages of this setup ?
Old 08-27-2010 | 07:02 AM
  #18  
AcidJake75's Avatar
AcidJake75
Living in 350Z
Premier Member
iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

^^^Im sure he meant offsets holmes.. not size of rims (IF thats what you meant)...
Old 08-27-2010 | 07:09 AM
  #19  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

Originally Posted by noodleman
more like if you don't need a roll then the offset is "wrong". Flush is right!
Declaring something flush is an opinion. Fact: Rolling your fenders unnecessarily is silly.

Originally Posted by srsairbags
hmmm . . i have a noob question(s) . . . why did you go to a 17F, 18R setup ? is it for the track ? what are the advantages of this setup ?
That's the offset, not the wheel diameter.
Old 08-27-2010 | 08:04 AM
  #20  
noodleman's Avatar
noodleman
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by scotts300
Declaring something flush is an opinion. Fact: Rolling your fenders unnecessarily is silly.
that's your opinion, not a fact. alot of things people do to their cars can be considered both unnecessary and silly.

i was just trying to playful instead of getting into this debate. fact: i quoted the word "wrong" for a reason.


Quick Reply: Is the 8.5/9.5 setup dead? Was it ever alive?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:57 PM.