Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Finally Got In a 350Z 300hp 35th, Info and pics....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 07:36 PM
  #61  
nicolaycastro's Avatar
nicolaycastro
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Miami - FL
Default

Originally posted by doc91671
All I can say about the torque curve of the "new" engine is that it's making 246 pounds of torque at 6400 rpms, where as the "standard" engine is making 243 pounds of torque at 6200 rpms.
humm interesting since they mention the torque to the crank is lower than on the old engine...
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 04:37 AM
  #62  
ChinaClipper's Avatar
ChinaClipper
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 970
Likes: 2
From: Rockwall, Texas
Default apples to apples === oranges to oranges

Originally posted by nicolaycastro
humm interesting since they mention the torque to the crank is lower than on the old engine...
Lets clear up any misconceptions here. The 287 hp engine puts out more torque. 274 ft-lbs at 4800 rpm. The 300 hp engine puts out its maximum torque, 246 ft-lbs @ a higher rpm - 6400 rpm. At that same rpm, the 287 hp engine puts out lower torque (but not by much). Question is, what is the torque difference between motors at 4800 rpm?

Last edited by ChinaClipper; Mar 2, 2005 at 04:40 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 05:03 AM
  #63  
topfri's Avatar
topfri
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

Some mags have characterized the 287hp engine as a muscle car motor, it appears nissan has nudged the engine a little in the Porche direction.

The 300hp motor will out run us in the quarter mile but I'm sure it's at the expense of some of that easy to access around town torque between 3k and4k.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 10:28 AM
  #64  
nicolaycastro's Avatar
nicolaycastro
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Miami - FL
Default Re: apples to apples === oranges to oranges

Originally posted by ChinaClipper
Lets clear up any misconceptions here. The 287 hp engine puts out more torque. 274 ft-lbs at 4800 rpm. The 300 hp engine puts out its maximum torque, 246 ft-lbs @ a higher rpm - 6400 rpm. At that same rpm, the 287 hp engine puts out lower torque (but not by much). Question is, what is the torque difference between motors at 4800 rpm?
humm still interesting but in agood way
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 10:55 AM
  #65  
Camel's Avatar
Camel
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

I dunno, I have the 300hp engine in my 35th and I've driven a few with the "usual" engine and they seem about the same to me. *shrug*
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #67  
topfri's Avatar
topfri
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

sounds like there isn't a dimes worth of difference overall in the two...the effect of a reflash on this new engine might be interesting.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 12:53 PM
  #68  
Camel's Avatar
Camel
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

My advice to any new Z buyer would be to pick the trim level that suits your needs and buy it. I got the 35th because I wanted leather and all the gadgets and I also wanted the Brembos, etc. I would have bought the car anyway even if it was the 287hp rating. I am not a professional race car driver, so the difference between the 2 would never be realized by me personally. IMHO, you can't really go wrong with either one.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #69  
topfri's Avatar
topfri
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

I hear you Camel, I think most of the guys hear are curious if the 300hp engine has more mod potential and what it bodes for the future.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 01:07 PM
  #70  
Camel's Avatar
Camel
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

Agreed, I am curious but beyond the Nismo intake that is already installed and maybe a catback, that will be the extent of my modding. I threw well over 10 grand into my WRX and ended up losing over 1/2 of it. Just the nature of modding I guess, but I won't be doing that again.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 03:37 PM
  #71  
chaofun's Avatar
chaofun
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Does the exhaust sound any different than a regular z?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 08:03 PM
  #72  
obsidian02's Avatar
obsidian02
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

where is the pictures?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 08:26 PM
  #73  
Camel's Avatar
Camel
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

Originally posted by chaofun
Does the exhaust sound any different than a regular z?
Not that I can tell...
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 09:39 PM
  #74  
doc91671's Avatar
doc91671
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: california
Default

Lets clear up any misconceptions here. The 287 hp engine puts out more torque. 274 ft-lbs at 4800 rpm. The 300 hp engine puts out its maximum torque, 246 ft-lbs @ a higher rpm - 6400 rpm. At that same rpm, the 287 hp engine puts out lower torque (but not by much). Question is, what is the torque difference between motors at 4800 rpm?


The new engine does not put out its max torque at 6400 rpms...this occurs at 4800 rpms and it's 260 pounds.


__________________

The new engins max
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gc350z03
Forced Induction
114
Oct 28, 2016 05:00 PM
_koubie_
Engine & Drivetrain
5
Sep 20, 2015 06:34 PM
hardkicks
Zs & Gs For Sale
0
Sep 20, 2015 12:28 PM
OperatorAF
New Owners
9
Sep 13, 2015 11:36 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 AM.