Today pat goss "MD/DC/VA guy" had a guest on his radio show.

a caller called up and asked what would be the better car.

350Z, Eclipse, or Neon SRT.

The guest host replyed with.

the 350Z is the best all around car. However it depends on what you want in a car. if you want a great package the 350Z has it all. if you want best engine performance for the buck then go with the SRT however if you want the best looking car buy the Eclipse.....

is it just me or do you guys also think this guy is on crack?

Pat Goss did say the 350Z was not in the same class as the others and IHO was a wonderful car. Maybe to keep the show flowing pat didnt argue with the dumbass that thinks the eclipse looks the best out of the 3.

I do agree with the other guy when he said the SRT looked like any other neon so looks wise it was at the bottom of the list.

but come on, a eclipse?

 

Makes no sense to me at all? Why the hell would anyone think the Eclipse is good looking, compared to ANYTHING?! Its so 4 years ago

 

it's all subjective...

to Goss... those are his view, they might not be yours...

You can't knock him for that... TO EACH HIS OWN

 

Goss said the 350Z was a great car in another class. It was his guest host Jim something or other that said the Eclipse was better looking.

I respect Pat Goss. just not sure about that guest host guy

 

i would rock the eclipse from 2 fast 2 furious

 

Was he talkin about the 2005 Eclipse? If so I can see it being said because its a brand new design...he may like it now but once on the road it may be even uglier.

 

The guy probably drives an Eclipse himself....

 

He was talking about the currently still being sold eclipse.

 

In that case....hahahahahaha

 

the newer eclipse is one of the ugliest cars on the road toady, imo