Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

August Car & Driver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 09:06 AM
  #101  
raceboy's Avatar
raceboy
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
From: Smackahoe Blvd
Default

The trap speed doesn't make sense with that 14.1 ET?? Maybe the clutch has already been worked to death, that makes more sense. If the clutch was costing .2 seconds that would mean 0-60 in 5.2 and 1/4 of 13.9. That makes more sense with a 101 mph trap. How can a freakin slushbox, lower HP, heavier G35 be only .8 sec behind in the 0-60?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 09:19 AM
  #102  
The Apple's Avatar
The Apple
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Behind You!!
Default

What I find interesting is that on every other msgboard where this information has been posted (VWVortex, Clubsi, I-Club, just to name a few), all the responses have been super positive. Yet here, on an acctual 350Z board, there's a buncha pissing and moaning.

Unless we get scans of the article, or at least some more numbers (slolam, braking, etc), I think this thread has been milked for all it's worth.

p.s. SeedyRom's post was right on.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 09:22 AM
  #103  
SunsetZ's Avatar
SunsetZ
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Default

Can we please get the entire article scanned for all of us to read? I know you had trouble with the scanner, but we would all be eternally greatfull if you would scan the whole article and get it to Jay so that we can read it, Thanks!
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 09:45 AM
  #104  
InternetABYSS's Avatar
InternetABYSS
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
From: Dallas TX
Default I can say one more thing.....

Did they test the car with the antenna screwed on the car or did they take it off.

Don't you all know that cuts down drag and gives the expected 5.2 0-60 and the 13.5 quater mile.

Thats what my sources say---my third cousins sisters brothers friend at the manufactuer of the acme fixed antenna shop said.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 09:49 AM
  #105  
InternetABYSS's Avatar
InternetABYSS
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
From: Dallas TX
Default this last post is for the commuters to this forum from zcar.com

........PLEASE WAIT AND SEE ALL THE INFORMATION THIS IS JUST ANOTHER TIDBIT.........I UNDERSTAND I CAN'T WAIT TO GET IT ALL EITHER.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 09:59 AM
  #106  
JamieH's Avatar
JamieH
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default Z's in Washington

There seem to be quite a few Washington/Seattle types posting on these boards. Either we have great taste, or we just have more computer people around here.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 10:06 AM
  #107  
RxO's Avatar
RxO
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Colon, Panama
Default Magazine Releases:

For some unknown reason some areas of the world get special treatment on magazine delivery. Yesterday I received a japanese magazine for August. It has the Fairlady specs. that are supposed to remain stum until 29-06. But here it is!
Attached Thumbnails August Car & Driver-js08a.jpg  
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 10:11 AM
  #108  
silverstone_350z's Avatar
silverstone_350z
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

0-60 in 5.4 secs is awesome.
the 1/4 mile time is pretty crappy, but then again, like everyone had said, this isnt the production car and this is only one mag.

god, i cant wait till July 3rd, hopefully we get little better numbers.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 10:25 AM
  #109  
BrianZ's Avatar
BrianZ
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default Re: I can say one more thing.....

Originally posted by InternetABYSS
Did they test the car with the antenna screwed on the car or did they take it off.

Don't you all know that cuts down drag and gives the expected 5.2 0-60 and the 13.5 quater mile.

Thats what my sources say---my third cousins sisters brothers friend at the manufactuer of the acme fixed antenna shop said.
LOL!

That's the problem!
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 10:38 AM
  #110  
TimZ's Avatar
TimZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Default

Can we please stop this whining over a preliminary test on a pre-production car? As mentioned before, Nissan has delivered on 98% of what they originally promised on a $27,000 sportscar. If you decided, as I did, to add options and buy the Touring or Track model and pay $35,000 plus, then it was your decision.

Being concerned if the car does 0-60 in 5.4, 5.2 or 4.9 is only important if you want to do some table racing with your friends over one too many beers and you need to feel superior to someone else whose car posted slower in a C&D test result. And if you are someone who wants good results in a magazine so you can feel fairly confident in a "street race", please give some thought to the risk to your car and more importantly to the health of you, your passenger and the passengers of cars around you.

Being lucky enough to have seen the car in person, I can guarantee that you will be very happy with the way it looks. If you feel a need to gain that extra .2 or .5 seconds in 0-60 to achieve nirvana, then personalize your car with some Nismo mods, enjoy your life and move on.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 10:53 AM
  #111  
raceboy's Avatar
raceboy
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
From: Smackahoe Blvd
Default

I am much more concerned with the weight. That had better be an "As Tested" weight or else I am out. I do really think that is the weight with the driver, fuel, and test equipment.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 11:49 AM
  #112  
02MaximizedVQ's Avatar
02MaximizedVQ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, MS
Default

If Car and Driver got a 14.1 out of a production fresh Z I garuantee you guys that an owner will pull a 13.9 or quicker stock. I have noticed in the past that C&D has slow times compared to Motor Trend. The power to weight ratio is very nice on the 350. And the trap speed is alittle above avg for a 14.1. This car once broken in and lightly modified with intake and cat-back exhuast (Stillen X-pipe?) will be running mid 13.6X with a good driver. The tires will probably be the first thing I replace, if I end up buying one in Sept.

Jesse
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 12:21 PM
  #114  
dddd's Avatar
dddd
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: sydney aust
Default Re: Magazine Releases:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by RxO
For some unknown reason some areas of the world get special treatment on magazine delivery. Yesterday I received a japanese magazine for August. It has the Fairlady specs. that are supposed to remain stum until 29-06. But here it is! [/QUOTe


Please tell us what the weight is of the Japanese Fairlady.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 01:08 PM
  #115  
Finality's Avatar
Finality
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Default

Originally posted by VQracer
I'm happy about the performance especially with the price I paid. 1/4 mile time is low though.

for some perspective a 2K2 6-speed Maxima owner got 13.9 1/4 time bone stock.
Uhhh no. The fastest driver we have is a 14.23 and thats with major skill & good track conditions. The average driver pulls 14.5s.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 01:53 PM
  #118  
silverstone_350z's Avatar
silverstone_350z
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

God, where is July 3rd?? haha
this is getting out of hand...but i must admit, though this is a rough time and everyone is jumping out of place, including me, it is very exciting at the same time. all of this for one amazing vehicle...Bravo Nissan..
cant wait for my silverstone Z.
Attached Thumbnails August Car & Driver-my-final-z.jpg  
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 01:58 PM
  #119  
silverstone_350z's Avatar
silverstone_350z
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

one more note...Jmans, you are doing an awesome job keeping your cool, just wanted to let you know that you are appreciated, by many i am sure... hang tough, as i am trying to as well.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 02:59 PM
  #120  
Dr Bonz's Avatar
Dr Bonz
Charter Member #19
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,490
Likes: 8
From: Zainoland
Default

Jay, you keep insisting that this is real. Why then, has no one addressed the Almighty July 3rd embargo? How can they have violated it with this article? Supposedly (as was posted here many times) any mag. that would violate this sacred date would suffer severe repercussions. How can they do this? No one seems to have an answer.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:45 AM.