Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

So the Z is really a mid engine car ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 09:18 AM
  #1  
SteveZ33's Avatar
SteveZ33
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Wenonah, NJ.
Default So the Z is really a mid engine car ?

Based on the quote below. Note the the RX7 reference. Our cars are also set up with the engine behind the front wheels. So is it offical? Can we refer to the 350z as a mid-engine car? Quote takenfrom:http://home.pon.net/hunnicutt/perfdriv.htm

Neutral handling or "drifting" - This is when all four tires will lose traction at the same time so the car drifts instead of plowing straight ahead (understeer) or spinning (oversteer). This is the ideal situation for the race track. Some cars are easier to set up than others. Car like the mid-engined Porsche Boxster or Toyota MR2 or an RX-7 (front engine, but it's behind the front wheels) are easier to set up for neutral steering as opposed to a Mustang or a FWD car.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 09:54 AM
  #2  
roast's Avatar
roast
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 1
From: Okay, see?
Default

It's actually called front mid-ship.

Drifting is not when all 4 tires break traction. Drifting is also NOT fast nor is it desireable at a track.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 10:09 AM
  #3  
Vamos_Rafael's Avatar
Vamos_Rafael
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: Villanova University
Default

umm... its placed behind the front wheels but its still an FR set up...
drifting is not the fastest on the track (on a track its called powersliding) is because the slide ways action takse valuable time rather than going from apex to apex...
unless you have a track by urself or have safe distance between u and other drivers on a track.. its unsafe
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #4  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Yep, front mid-ship RWD...
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 12:31 PM
  #5  
Vamos_Rafael's Avatar
Vamos_Rafael
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: Villanova University
Default

Originally Posted by Kolia
Yep, front mid-ship RWD...
...
its still front heavy...
real mid engine sports cars are usually rear heavy (lotus elise) or very very balanced (ferrari)
but there are better FR cars compared to the Z interms of weight balance..
the M3 = 50% F 50% R
while the Z is 60% F 40% R
the s2000 on the other hand ( very small I4 engine) is 50% F 50% R ...
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #6  
Blurr350z's Avatar
Blurr350z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
From: Delaware
Default

Originally Posted by jvanquish
...
its still front heavy...
real mid engine sports cars are usually rear heavy (lotus elise) or very very balanced (ferrari)
but there are better FR cars compared to the Z interms of weight balance..
the M3 = 50% F 50% R
while the Z is 60% F 40% R
the s2000 on the other hand ( very small I4 engine) is 50% F 50% R ...
The Z is not 60/40 in weight distribution. According to Nissanmotors.com, the weight ratio is 53% F 47% R for all models, Base Enth Tour Track Grand.

Manual transmission 3,339 3,346 3,400 3,370 3,404
Automatic transmission N/A 3,344 3,380 N/A 3,391
Weight distribution 53/47 53/47 53/47 53/47 53/47
http://www.nissanusa.com/vehicles/Mo...26256|,00.html
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 01:25 PM
  #7  
welles's Avatar
welles
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by SteveZ33
So is it offical? Can we refer to the 350z as a mid-engine car?
No. Nissan officially refers to the FM platform as "front midship", and states that the centerline of the engine sits behind the centerline of the front wheels. This stretches the definition of "mid-engined" past its' breaking point. A true mid-engined car (Ferrari, Lotus, etc.) locates the ENTIRE engine within the wheelbase (in this case, behind the front wheels).

Bottom line, this is a little marketing ploy by Nissan. This is not to say that the Z isn't a very fine handling car - it is. It does not, however, have the razor sharp turn-in of a true mid-engined car.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 01:52 PM
  #8  
Jason@Performance's Avatar
Jason@Performance
Sponsor
Performance Nissan
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,783
Likes: 3
From: So-Cal - Ready to go?
Default

Originally Posted by roast
It's actually called front mid-ship.

Drifting is not when all 4 tires break traction. Drifting is also NOT fast nor is it desireable at a track.

when only the rear wheels break loose its a power slide...

alot of race driving is done while all 4 wheels are sliding slightly...

"Drifting" as it is commonly known now is with a more aggressive angle for show...

when trail braking... its baslicly a drift but not slideways...

in short...
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 02:11 PM
  #9  
aonic's Avatar
aonic
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by jvanquish
...
its still front heavy...
real mid engine sports cars are usually rear heavy (lotus elise) or very very balanced (ferrari)
but there are better FR cars compared to the Z interms of weight balance..
the M3 = 50% F 50% R
while the Z is 60% F 40% R
the s2000 on the other hand ( very small I4 engine) is 50% F 50% R ...
The Z’s FM (Front Mid-Ship) platform positions the engine behind the front axle, providing an optimized front-to-rear weight balance of 53/47.

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache...ient=firefox-a
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 02:36 PM
  #10  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

Jvanquish.. a neutral drift is when the whole car shifts outward. ever seen evo's track? The rear dosn't drift out and the front doesn't squeel.. the whole car literally slides outward. Its what you'd want..you dont like velocity in the direction u want to do, accerlation from the centriptial accerlation is made into lateral velocity
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 03:54 PM
  #11  
MustGoFastR's Avatar
MustGoFastR
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by Blurr350z
The Z is not 60/40 in weight distribution. According to Nissanmotors.com, the weight ratio is 53% F 47% R for all models, Base Enth Tour Track Grand.

Manual transmission 3,339 3,346 3,400 3,370 3,404
Automatic transmission N/A 3,344 3,380 N/A 3,391
Weight distribution 53/47 53/47 53/47 53/47 53/47
http://www.nissanusa.com/vehicles/Mo...26256|,00.html

PLUS, from the '03 brochure: "The better the sports car, the quicker the desires of the driver become the actions of the car. Which is why every pound, every ounch of the new Z has been analyzed for one magical result. A 53/47 weight distribution. It's a complex series of calculations that equate to a moment of perfection when it counts the most, in the apex of a turn. During heavy braking, as the driver approaches the apex, additional weight shifts to the front of the Z for improved traction on the front wheels as the driver actually enters the turn. And at the precise moment the driver accelerates out of the apex, that weight distribution shifts rearward and, magically, becomes an approximate 50/50 balance. Which translates to a high-performance driver's favorite word. Stability: less cornering pitch. Better tire contact. Quicker turns. More go."

It's called a front mid-ships platform to describe the car in terms of weight distribution, but it is a front-engined car in terms of construction. The physical location of the engine is what makes it front, mid or rear-engined.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 10:28 PM
  #12  
Blurr350z's Avatar
Blurr350z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
From: Delaware
Default

Originally Posted by MustGoFastR
PLUS, from the '03 brochure: "The better the sports car, the quicker the desires of the driver become the actions of the car. Which is why every pound, every ounch of the new Z has been analyzed for one magical result. A 53/47 weight distribution. It's a complex series of calculations that equate to a moment of perfection when it counts the most, in the apex of a turn. During heavy braking, as the driver approaches the apex, additional weight shifts to the front of the Z for improved traction on the front wheels as the driver actually enters the turn. And at the precise moment the driver accelerates out of the apex, that weight distribution shifts rearward and, magically, becomes an approximate 50/50 balance. Which translates to a high-performance driver's favorite word. Stability: less cornering pitch. Better tire contact. Quicker turns. More go."

It's called a front mid-ships platform to describe the car in terms of weight distribution, but it is a front-engined car in terms of construction. The physical location of the engine is what makes it front, mid or rear-engined.
thank you.. I hate when the Z is underestimated
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 01:23 AM
  #13  
NA350Z's Avatar
NA350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by jvanquish
...
its still front heavy...
real mid engine sports cars are usually rear heavy (lotus elise) or very very balanced (ferrari)
but there are better FR cars compared to the Z interms of weight balance..
the M3 = 50% F 50% R
while the Z is 60% F 40% R
the s2000 on the other hand ( very small I4 engine) is 50% F 50% R ...

How could you have that many posts and say the Z is 60/40, I knew the weight distribution before the car even came out, but then again, im a car nut.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 04:51 AM
  #14  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Guys, you’re mistaking marketing sales pitch for car dynamics here… 50/50 balance is not necessarily a “perfect” setup, whether it a static 50/50 or a dynamic one (like the Z). A rear heavy car is harder to drive but often faster on a race track.

The terminology for mid-engine cars varies from manufacturer to manufacturer. It’s generally accepted that “Mid-Ship” or “Mid-Engine” refers to an engine mounted behind the driver, in front of the rear axle. But, technically an engine mounted just behind the front wheel can be considered a “Mid-Ship” engine. It’s semantics at this point…
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 05:41 AM
  #15  
buho62's Avatar
buho62
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: WDM, IA
Default

Originally Posted by NA350Z
How could you have that many posts and say the Z is 60/40.
post *****?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 08:49 AM
  #16  
highside107's Avatar
highside107
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,632
Likes: 0
From: New York, NY
Default

Originally Posted by NA350Z
How could you have that many posts and say the Z is 60/40, I knew the weight distribution before the car even came out, but then again, im a car nut.
Another reason why he's on my 'ignore list'..
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 12:28 PM
  #17  
mavtais's Avatar
mavtais
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: CentralCal - Fresno
Default

Originally Posted by highside107
Another reason why he's on my 'ignore list'..
There was a thread dedicated to telling people why the should place him (jvanquish) on the ignore list.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 12:53 PM
  #18  
mikeg8r's Avatar
mikeg8r
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: Venice, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Kolia
Guys, you’re mistaking marketing sales pitch for car dynamics here… 50/50 balance is not necessarily a “perfect” setup, whether it a static 50/50 or a dynamic one (like the Z). A rear heavy car is harder to drive but often faster on a race track.
Maybe a real gearhead can answer this (as I'm not one my anymeans) but it was always my understanding that in a front heavy car (like 60/40), you would actually get a more equal weight transfer while accelerating a bit. Also you would get better handling entering corners (more weight on the front wheels you wouldn't need to brake as much) and better speed out of corners (weight transfering toward the back during acceleration). Of course your driving style, tires and suspension set up as well has probably just a much to do with handling characteristics as static weight distribution as well.

Plus is this with a full tank of gas? 20 gallons of gas adds a significant amount of weight to the back.

IMHO - whatever the definition of drifting, it is certainly not going to win you any time trials. Anytime the tires loose grip mean you aren't putting 100% of your available power down to the ground, so you can't be going faster than someone with a perfect line (though it's possible you could be just as fast). It sure looks cool tho
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
etkms
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jun 19, 2022 06:30 PM
RyansZ33
Maintenance & Repair
8
Sep 15, 2015 05:54 AM
torchkc
Engine & Drivetrain
11
Sep 11, 2015 08:26 PM
fst100
North East
1
Sep 8, 2015 11:37 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 PM.