Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Z is not too slow after all

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 07:40 AM
  #1  
rai's Avatar
rai
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 0
From: maryland
Smile Z is not too slow after all

One things true out of 15 million cars sold each year, the Z is probably quicker than all but maybe 150,000. (I am not sure this is the actual number but it is an approximation) works out to being faster than 99% of un-modified cars. I put the vettes, the ferraries, the nsx's the M cars, the special mustangs, lambos, aston martins, some MB's in the faster category. Not too bad.

And the thing is those faster cars are not driven much faster than I will be driving my Z. My friend has a 911 tt ($120K) awesome car, I doubt he ever droped a clutch and got a sub 5 sec 0-60. He just likes the fact that it has a ton of pickup (more than he will ever use).

Now thats not to say that there is a fringe group out there in modded TA's and Stangs, and nitros civics that can trounce the Z. But I'm more concerned with everyday driving and taking off from a stoplight kind of fast, and 5.4 or 5.2 or whatever it may be is pretty good.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 12:02 PM
  #2  
roberto350z's Avatar
roberto350z
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
From: Sun Diego
Default

nice
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 03:45 PM
  #3  
BigBadBuford's Avatar
BigBadBuford
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: Hummelstown, PA
Default

If you can really drive your Z, I dont think there will be too many stock cars on the street to worry about. I just got my copy of C&D in and I was comparing the Z to other sports cars in terms of acceleration and handling. The Z will take on pretty much every other sports car up until the $75,000 range. It handles as well as the M cars, and has a better 0-60 time than a Porsche 911. I hope to see a 5.2/13.7 or so out of the Z in another magazine test, but even with the numbers we know so far its a fast car.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 09:56 PM
  #4  
Touring6MT_Z's Avatar
Touring6MT_Z
Charter Member #49
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Default Re: Z is not too slow after all

Originally posted by rai
One things true out of 15 million cars sold each year, the Z is probably quicker than all but maybe 150,000. (I am not sure this is the actual number but it is an approximation) works out to being faster than 99% of un-modified cars. I put the vettes, the ferraries, the nsx's the M cars, the special mustangs, lambos, aston martins, some MB's in the faster category. Not too bad.

And the thing is those faster cars are not driven much faster than I will be driving my Z. My friend has a 911 tt ($120K) awesome car, I doubt he ever droped a clutch and got a sub 5 sec 0-60. He just likes the fact that it has a ton of pickup (more than he will ever use).

Now thats not to say that there is a fringe group out there in modded TA's and Stangs, and nitros civics that can trounce the Z. But I'm more concerned with everyday driving and taking off from a stoplight kind of fast, and 5.4 or 5.2 or whatever it may be is pretty good.
rai,

In fact I had the same thought last week after all the complaints about the C&D Road Test results. I scanned through the C&D Road Test Digest, there aren't many stock cars that outperformed the 350Z. For those that are, most cost significantly more than the Z, so they will represent a very small population on the street.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 10:04 PM
  #5  
rai's Avatar
rai
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 0
From: maryland
Default

I got the aoto week magazine it had the numbers of cars sold in the US for cretain cars, there were only like 1000 M5's sold here. The ferrari's, lambos, aston martins, AMG's all put together are probably less than 5,000 cars total. 911/911 tt probably around 5,000. NSX around 500 cars. The two most common faster cars are the vettes (35,000) and the M3's (not sure but probably around 10,000).

It appears that these cars are all over the place, but thats because every car magazine puts them onthe cover because it sell magazines.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 10:12 PM
  #6  
SunsetZ's Avatar
SunsetZ
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Default

Not a flame, but the 2002 911 is 0-60 in 4.9 sec

http://www.car-stats.com/
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2002 | 06:38 AM
  #7  
Runn's Avatar
Runn
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Bham,AL
Default

I Know this was discussed yesterday but alot of you were saying that the rx7 would take the Z in the straights. But how is this p ossiple since the rx7 run like 5.3-5.4 and around 14.1 in the qter and usually arrives in at 99mph
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2002 | 07:13 PM
  #8  
bigone's Avatar
bigone
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: miami
Default

you forgot the GM F bodies. The Z28 and Trans AM have the same 5.7 litre engine as the Corvette. It may be rated a few ponies less then the Vette's, but it is well known that they still produce 325+ hp and that's conservative.

A Z will be no match for either of these in the straights
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2002 | 07:45 PM
  #9  
skimark's Avatar
skimark
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Highlands Ranch, Colorado
Default

Good catch Bigone

The F bodies do provide alot of bang for the buck although I think 2002 is the last year GM is making them. I could never live with the high school racer styling, poor build quality and cheesy interiors although who can argue with the 5.7 LS1.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Obadabot
Maintenance & Repair
16
Jun 18, 2023 11:31 PM
etkms
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jun 19, 2022 06:30 PM
bneumann
Engine & Drivetrain
5
Oct 7, 2015 12:16 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:45 AM.