Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

05' track and 35th ann. Z's the best of both wolds?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #1  
shifty711's Avatar
shifty711
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: Detroit area Michigan
Default 05' track and 35th ann. Z's the best of both wolds?

I think that personally i have the best Z of all the current ones out. I have an 35th 05'. So that means I have the lighter Z with revup motor. Hmmmmmm. Do you guys think 05' tracks and 35th's will have the best resale value? Lighter weight, and a better topend and more mod friendly motor. What do you guys think about this.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 12:10 PM
  #2  
shifty711's Avatar
shifty711
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: Detroit area Michigan
Default

Worlds
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 12:12 PM
  #3  
blueper4mancez's Avatar
blueper4mancez
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, ATL .
Default

i think your 35th weight as much as a new touring or grand touring, ooh yeah them wheels are heavy too (cast iron)anyways it nice looking though.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #4  
Andy@Performance's Avatar
Andy@Performance
Sponsor
Performance Nissan
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,151
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena/Bay Area
Default

35th actually weighs more but will holda better resale value than other models.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 12:18 PM
  #5  
shifty711's Avatar
shifty711
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: Detroit area Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by blueper4mancez
i think your 35th weight as much as a new touring or grand touring, ooh yeah them wheels are heavy too (cast iron)anyways it nice looking though.
The wheels are cast aluminum. If they were cast iron they would weigh 5394 lbs each.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 12:19 PM
  #6  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

You the man!
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 12:20 PM
  #7  
blueper4mancez's Avatar
blueper4mancez
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, ATL .
Default

oops my bad lols that's what i meant jeez stupid me
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #8  
shifty711's Avatar
shifty711
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: Detroit area Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by davidv
You the man!
Oh i know im bad baby.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2006 | 01:41 AM
  #9  
Armitage's Avatar
Armitage
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 3
From: North Jersey
Default

Actually the 03-05 models weight are underrated. My '05 Track with a 1/4 tank of gas and no spare/jack/tools weighed in at 3223. Nissan claims around 3225 for curb weight.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2006 | 02:57 AM
  #10  
bloodwings19's Avatar
bloodwings19
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

For us, the 35th is a better car overall, but for the public, most can't tell. I saw a 35th silver at a Range Rover dealership with 4K miles selling for $27,999. I know it was the anniversary model because it had Brembo, 2006 wheels and 2005 taillights. And the logo on the side, I believe is not black. Nissan should of done 35th on the badge and on the seats like the Vette did with their 2003 Anniversary model.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2006 | 05:28 AM
  #11  
Manu's Avatar
Manu
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 440
Likes: 1
From: Geneva, Switzerland
Default

That's precisely why I went for a 35th anniversary model. There's no track model over here, so the 35th is the only way to get the lightweight with the Rev-up engine.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2006 | 08:00 AM
  #12  
hbenet's Avatar
hbenet
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: Broomfield, CO
Default

'05 Track all the way
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2006 | 10:16 AM
  #13  
Category5's Avatar
Category5
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: South Miami, FL
Default

The rev-up motor is the lower-torque motor. Lower-torque = slower 0-60 performance. Plus, the 05-Base is lighter than the Track/35th anniv. So, you loose on both counts.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
apex locator
Autocross/Road
10
Jul 23, 2021 02:27 AM
hajwoj
Autocross/Road
27
Nov 1, 2015 05:25 PM
MicVelo
NorCal Marketplace
9
Oct 4, 2015 07:55 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:18 PM.