Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Some good 07 engine information

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 05:08 PM
  #1  
boomer gt's Avatar
boomer gt
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: California
Default Some good 07 engine information

http://tinyurl.com/yva7fg

Last edited by boomer gt; Jan 20, 2007 at 04:59 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 05:15 PM
  #2  
zand02max's Avatar
zand02max
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,983
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by boomer gt
http://www.*********.com/zwiki/VQ35HR_Presentation

sorry if it doesn't link by mouse.
We're not mind readers, care to fill the *************************************** in?
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 08:06 PM
  #3  
mthreat's Avatar
mthreat
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 888
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by zand02max
We're not mind readers, care to fill the *************************************** in?
Yes: http://tinyurl.com/yva7fg
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 08:51 PM
  #4  
daz311x's Avatar
daz311x
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

slide 37 says it accelerates to 60 mph one second faster!!
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 09:02 PM
  #5  
hiz-n-herz's Avatar
hiz-n-herz
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: SF South Bay area
Default

Originally Posted by daz311x
slide 37 says it accelerates to 60 mph one second faster!!
repost... But I'll comment anyway cause I hate the repost police...

They say the ENGINE does. It does it in the 07 G35 coupe, with the help of a shorter final drive, which the Z will not get. No idea why! Z will prolly be .2 seconds quicker to 60, which means the G35 coupe will still be faster than the z. G35 owners spend more $$ on their cars and prolly expect to be faster. I have no idea...

I think Nissan will some out with a supercharged or twin turbo version on the new HR engine... Why else the stronger bottom end? Why no lower final drive? What is the mystery model that has not come out yet?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 04:54 AM
  #6  
boomer gt's Avatar
boomer gt
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Sorry I cut and pasted and went to bed without checking. Wasn't sure if it would be direct link. I guess the paste dried and left some ****** behind. LOL

Mthreat..thanks for the quick fix!!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #7  
RBlover69's Avatar
RBlover69
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: Whorelando
Default

Originally Posted by hiz-n-herz
repost... But I'll comment anyway cause I hate the repost police...

They say the ENGINE does. It does it in the 07 G35 coupe, with the help of a shorter final drive, which the Z will not get. No idea why! Z will prolly be .2 seconds quicker to 60, which means the G35 coupe will still be faster than the z. G35 owners spend more $$ on their cars and prolly expect to be faster. I have no idea...

I think Nissan will some out with a supercharged or twin turbo version on the new HR engine... Why else the stronger bottom end? Why no lower final drive? What is the mystery model that has not come out yet?
i doubt the g 35 coupe with the HR will be faster stock then the Z HR. That doesnt make any sense considering it will also weight more. lmao. It will be the same ratio as the current Z and G with the Z beating just out of sheer weight. There not going to make there flag sports car slower then there flag sports coupe. i

Last edited by RBlover69; Jan 20, 2007 at 02:51 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 02:51 PM
  #8  
RBlover69's Avatar
RBlover69
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: Whorelando
Default

i meant faster stock in the G coupe the the Z stock both fitted with Hrs.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #9  
Stanky19's Avatar
Stanky19
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Default

that seems like someone at nissan just altering graphs to make their boss happy. 6 more hp than the current Vq motor, is not going to make 1 sec. 0-60mph improvement. Unless the tourque curve changes drastically, it's a bunch of overhyped big words.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #10  
Ilov350ZEE's Avatar
Ilov350ZEE
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
From: Z world
Default

its not only 6 hp more like 15-20hp. The 306hp from the HR motor is rated under the new SAE hp rating, if you convert that to the old rating i'll be around 315-320hp. Get it?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 07:08 AM
  #11  
rockinbboy's Avatar
rockinbboy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 0
From: Wild Wild West
Default

Originally Posted by Ilov350ZEE
its not only 6 hp more like 15-20hp. The 306hp from the HR motor is rated under the new SAE hp rating, if you convert that to the old rating i'll be around 315-320hp. Get it?
+1. Most people don't realize the new power rating is under the new SAE rating.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:53 AM
  #12  
RBlover69's Avatar
RBlover69
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: Whorelando
Default

i wonder what the REvups and previous Zs would rate under the sae ratings.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 10:05 AM
  #13  
rocks's Avatar
rocks
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 2
From: hobbs nm
Default

They probably rate the same as they did before. What is the lift of the cams in the HR?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 10:21 AM
  #14  
jeeper78's Avatar
jeeper78
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Appleton, WI
Default

Originally Posted by RBlover69
i wonder what the REvups and previous Zs would rate under the sae ratings.
It all depends on how much the numbers were fudged. The new system is just designed to eliminate the fudge factor, or "eliminate subjective interpretation in establishing horsepower claims".
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 11:55 AM
  #15  
RBlover69's Avatar
RBlover69
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: Whorelando
Default

so what about dyno jets using sae ratings, would those be a accurate tool . I always wondered what the industry used to dyno there products .
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 06:13 AM
  #16  
jeeper78's Avatar
jeeper78
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Appleton, WI
Default

The ratings you see on car spec sheets, I believe are supposed to be SAE net horsepower. This is measured at the flywheel, on an engine dyno, and the engine is tested with all accessories installed, including a full exhaust system, all pumps, the alternator, the starter, and emissions controls.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 05:35 AM
  #17  
ZmanZZZ's Avatar
ZmanZZZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

oooh ok, horsepower differential
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
liqalu04
Engine & Drivetrain
31
Jan 2, 2022 12:58 PM
Jambo016
New Owners
27
Sep 16, 2016 01:08 PM
Dymsi
Exterior & Interior
14
Sep 29, 2015 11:32 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 AM.