Why does everyone talk **** bout the 350Z?
#261
Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
Understood... but since your grammer is off, you can't correct him (or anyone until you practice it yourself).
#262
Originally Posted by doug
i accept the fact my grammar is off.. but i don't make claims to it being right when its wrong
#264
Originally Posted by Willie
You got it, that is why everyone hates the Z. Z owners have ****ty gramatical structure and we can't spell worth a ****.
It's in person where the lingo really needs to shape up.
#265
Originally Posted by 350-hold-the-z
It's the internet, shouldn't matter how people spell (to a limit).
It's in person where the lingo really needs to shape up.
It's in person where the lingo really needs to shape up.
#267
<-- Can't stand skittles
I take that back, they're in a way (no one get offended) like the 350Z crowd.
Some owners I can stand and get along with...
...then there's the others that hype their car up beyond belief, but that's mainly with the SRT-4 crowd, only know a couple Z owners like that (again, not saying anything bad, just what I've noticed)
I take that back, they're in a way (no one get offended) like the 350Z crowd.
Some owners I can stand and get along with...
...then there's the others that hype their car up beyond belief, but that's mainly with the SRT-4 crowd, only know a couple Z owners like that (again, not saying anything bad, just what I've noticed)
#269
Originally Posted by 350-hold-the-z
Ok class, today we're graduating from the 3rd grade
Mad/embarrassed I explained my point and you choose to deny it?
Mad/embarrassed I explained my point and you choose to deny it?
Maybe instead of trolling our forum, you should actually TRY LOOKING FOR THIS PERSON instead of talking ****. There's not one thread or post from you asking about him.
Your point sucked. Mad? Not quite. Embarrased? Sure thing buddy.
#271
Originally Posted by doug
i accept the fact my grammar is off.. but i don't make claims to it being right when its wrong
#272
Originally Posted by 350-hold-the-z
Because I'm not trying to make it obvious. Otherwise I would just do what you said and make a thread for it.
And I'm not exactly talking ****...more than I can say for you though
And I'm not exactly talking ****...more than I can say for you though
And not exactly talking ****? OK...
Originally Posted by 350-hold-the-z
wow...I've seen some ugly wheels before but dayum
Spend your money elsewhere
Spend your money elsewhere
Originally Posted by 350-hold-the-z
Ok class, today we're graduating from the 3rd grade
Originally Posted by 350-hold-the-z
like i said earlier, im using this time to do 2 things
1 - annoy people here (obviously you filled this spot)
1 - annoy people here (obviously you filled this spot)
Originally Posted by 350-hold-the-z
nice taillights...queer
and what's with "us dollars" no **** we're in america already
and what's with "us dollars" no **** we're in america already
Originally Posted by 350-hold-the-z
you must be a dumb rubbernecker to actually spend time building that sum*****
Originally Posted by 350-hold-the-z
quit the *****ing between 350z's and your stupid honduhs
cant match my ****in chevy *****es
cant match my ****in chevy *****es
#273
Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
LOL... this is funny. You're gonna sit here for a LONG time waiting for some info to show up about this guy. Why don't you just man up and run him instead of being a scared little stalker trying to find info.
And not exactly talking ****? OK...
Still not talking ****? Riiiiiiiight.
And not exactly talking ****? OK...
Still not talking ****? Riiiiiiiight.
I find it funny that you continue to waste your oh-so-precious time on me.
wow...I've seen some ugly wheels before but dayum
Spend your money elsewhere
Spend your money elsewhere
Ok class, today we're graduating from the 3rd grade
like i said earlier, im using this time to do 2 things
1 - annoy people here (obviously you filled this spot)
1 - annoy people here (obviously you filled this spot)
nice taillights...queer
you must be a dumb rubbernecker to actually spend time building that sum*****
quit the *****ing between 350z's and your stupid honduhs cant match my ****in chevy *****es
I already found out he's not on here, and I only wanted to see if it was worth my time or not.
Now, my mission is to solely annoy you because I find it funny how you get all butthurt about your oh-so-precious Z and your ***-handing evo
#276
Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
Oooohhhh... nice one.
Maybe instead of trolling our forum, you should actually TRY LOOKING FOR THIS PERSON instead of talking ****. There's not one thread or post from you asking about him.
Your point sucked. Mad? Not quite. Embarrased? Sure thing buddy.
Maybe instead of trolling our forum, you should actually TRY LOOKING FOR THIS PERSON instead of talking ****. There's not one thread or post from you asking about him.
Your point sucked. Mad? Not quite. Embarrased? Sure thing buddy.
hahaha, a troll calling another person a troll. truly classic
#277
There are a few things that really bothered me in the argument of Doug vs those other two guys. While I acknowledge that Doug is not really taking a side, I don't agree with the way he argues his point.
For one, Doug, you seem to disregard any information provided in a magazine and treat it as useless junk. However, information in those magazines are based on countless tests run by the magazine and accurate 1/4 mile times driven by professional drivers in the said car. Why would you disregard that information? Also, later on when that RSX guy posts a magazine's time stating the rsx-s ran 14.9s ... you then claimed vehemently that the car is a 14 second car. So magazines putting the car in the 15seconds should be ignored... but the one that has it as 14.9 is legit? Don't take this the wrong way, but reading that bugged me. Sure that number shows 14secs a possibility in a stock rsx-s, but outliers like that have negligible significance.
to the other two guys who i think stopped posting, good job posting information to back your points, but you do sound slightly like overzealous fanboys. I've forgotten what the original argument is but i agree with you guys, stock for stock, 350z is faster in a straight line that the rsx-s.
Wow, so I just read my post and I sound like a pompous ****. Umm, i don't mean to seriously offend anyone, but just couldn't hold back my words. and I still don't understand why people get so obsessed with going fast in a straight line... on a road course you get to go fast in a straight line and around corners! more is better?
ChiShi
For one, Doug, you seem to disregard any information provided in a magazine and treat it as useless junk. However, information in those magazines are based on countless tests run by the magazine and accurate 1/4 mile times driven by professional drivers in the said car. Why would you disregard that information? Also, later on when that RSX guy posts a magazine's time stating the rsx-s ran 14.9s ... you then claimed vehemently that the car is a 14 second car. So magazines putting the car in the 15seconds should be ignored... but the one that has it as 14.9 is legit? Don't take this the wrong way, but reading that bugged me. Sure that number shows 14secs a possibility in a stock rsx-s, but outliers like that have negligible significance.
to the other two guys who i think stopped posting, good job posting information to back your points, but you do sound slightly like overzealous fanboys. I've forgotten what the original argument is but i agree with you guys, stock for stock, 350z is faster in a straight line that the rsx-s.
Wow, so I just read my post and I sound like a pompous ****. Umm, i don't mean to seriously offend anyone, but just couldn't hold back my words. and I still don't understand why people get so obsessed with going fast in a straight line... on a road course you get to go fast in a straight line and around corners! more is better?
ChiShi
#278
Originally Posted by Willie
You got it, that is why everyone hates the Z. Z owners have ****ty gramatical structure and we can't spell worth a ****.
#280
Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
Very true, but it's like a police officer giving you a ticket for your taillight being out when his it out at the same time. The officer would have to either a) fix his light or b) ticket himself before ticketing you.