Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

AT vs MT

Old Apr 1, 2007 | 08:09 AM
  #81  
R3VAN's Avatar
R3VAN
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,947
Likes: 0
From: H-Town, Texas
Default abc123

My AT has, so far, beatin every MT off the line. Very few of those have beatin me, but when they did its always been when Ive hit 4th gear, when I hit 4th they were already ahead of me. & 5th gear automatic mode is like 6th gear manual. I love my AT, but I do have to admit that manuals are much more fun to drive, not to say that you cant have fun with AT's, just have to be creative lol

Last edited by R3VAN; Apr 1, 2007 at 08:37 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 08:29 AM
  #82  
HDPDZO6's Avatar
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

The only thing I hated about my AT 350Z was the wimpy 4th gear. Loved 3rd though.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 08:35 AM
  #83  
twinship's Avatar
twinship
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by Aggro_Al
Back when the 03-04 Enthusiast Z had the same configuration in MT and AT the only difference between the AT and MT was, of course, the tranny and the FD. These were the two closest matched MTs & ATs made so they are pretty representative of the difference. Of course you are going to have some factory freaks and dogs in that sample but barring those extremes they should be pretty well matched.

They both have the same engine.
The MT in 5th gear and the AT in 4th gear had the same 1:1 gear ratio
They both have the same 17" wheels as stock
The MT had a 3.7 FD vs the 3.5 FD on the AT
Al--

Did the stock AT/MT FDs change after 04? Believe they are now 3.5/3.3 for MT/AT.

Which leads to my question...

I've heard that swapping the stock 3.3 FD for a 3.5 FD is one of the best performance mods for the NA AT. Can you explain the science of that, and what the real world results of such a swap would be?

Thx, appreciate your expertise on all things AT-related.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #84  
HDPDZO6's Avatar
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

3.3AT/3.5MT since the 350Z was released. Not 3.5/3.7

3.5 swap for AT was indeed a good mod to do, whereas 3.5 to 3.9 for the MT. High powered FI apps was the opposite though. A 3.3 can be more preferrable for either transmission.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #85  
Aggro_Al's Avatar
Aggro_Al
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
3.3AT/3.5MT since the 350Z was released. Not 3.5/3.7

3.5 swap for AT was indeed a good mod to do, whereas 3.5 to 3.9 for the MT. High powered FI apps was the opposite though. A 3.3 can be more preferrable for either transmission.
Yup, you are right. It was 3.3 on the AT and 3.5 on the MT when they were stock.

Last edited by Aggro_Al; Apr 1, 2007 at 08:52 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 09:54 AM
  #86  
Aggro_Al's Avatar
Aggro_Al
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by twinship
Al--

Did the stock AT/MT FDs change after 04? Believe they are now 3.5/3.3 for MT/AT.

Which leads to my question...

I've heard that swapping the stock 3.3 FD for a 3.5 FD is one of the best performance mods for the NA AT. Can you explain the science of that, and what the real world results of such a swap would be?

Thx, appreciate your expertise on all things AT-related.
First of all, let me say that I was wrong about the size of the FD. It is stock 3.3/3.5 AT/MT.

Second, I'm not to familiar with the actual advantages or disadvantages of swapping the FD so my answer may not be what you are looking for or may not be even right. So, someone who has actually done the swap could give you a better answer.

I've heard that quite a few MTs have swapped their 3.5s for the 3.9s with good success. So, I'm assuming that swapping the 3.3 for the 3.5 would be similar as long as it doesn't put engine out of it's optimal powerband.

In general, going from a 3.3 to a 3.5 would increase the torque multiplication at the rear. The 3.5 should give you more torque and more whp at the same RPM as the 3.3 at the expense of velocity and gas mileage and it might even make the shift changes a little bit jerky. If you're not concerned about having the absolute highest speed or the best gas mileage or living with shifting that's not quite as smooth then a 3.5 swap would probably be pretty good swap if you want more torque and whp and faster acceleration. It would probably put you on par in the high RPMs with the stock MTs. One of the other things you have to be concerned about though is having too much torque multiplication this could make the some of the gears unusable in it's current ratios and actually make the car less than optimal because the engine is out of it's powerband. In this case, you would want to decrease torque multiplication as some people have found out when they went FI.

One of the other things you can look at if all you want is an increase in acceleration without sacrificing too much in gas mileage and still keeping the top end would be a high-stall torque converter. It's probably the best bang for buck on the 5AT that you can get short of getting FI. A mild increase can probably put your car in the very low 5s or the high 4s and still keep it streetable. A good high-stall converter and install cost would be less than $1k and it's probably closer to $800 and a couple hours of work to do the whole thing.

Last edited by Aggro_Al; Apr 1, 2007 at 10:18 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 10:25 AM
  #87  
twinship's Avatar
twinship
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by Aggro_Al
One of the other things you can look at if all you want is an increase in acceleration without sacrificing too much in gas mileage and still keeping the top end would be a high-stall torque converter. It's probably the best bang for buck on the 5AT that you can get short of getting FI. A mild increase can probably put your car in the very low 5s or the high 4s and still keep it streetable. A good high-stall converter and install cost would be less than $1k and it's probably closer to $800 and a couple hours of work to do the whole thing.
Interesting, hadn't considered that. Any ideas which vendors offer the high-stall converters?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 11:58 AM
  #88  
shanki456's Avatar
shanki456
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Haverhill, MA
Default

Sorry if there are 200 of these threads I was just wondering. Didn't mean to strike up all this controversy.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 12:28 PM
  #89  
Aggro_Al's Avatar
Aggro_Al
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by twinship
Interesting, hadn't considered that. Any ideas which vendors offer the high-stall converters?
I'm sure there are quite a few vendors but the first ones that come to mind right now are Level 10, Edge Racing and Pro Torque.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 12:50 PM
  #90  
twinship's Avatar
twinship
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Thx, Al.

You da AT man!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 02:39 PM
  #91  
Forrest80's Avatar
Forrest80
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
The only thing I hated about my AT 350Z was the wimpy 4th gear. Loved 3rd though.
Your so dam right, 1st, 2nd, 3rd the thrill, then 4th and its a let down the high is over.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 02:41 PM
  #92  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, NV
Default

Originally Posted by twinship
Thx, Al.

You da AT man!
Yup Al is the resident transmission guru
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #93  
HDPDZO6's Avatar
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Forrest80
Your so dam right, 1st, 2nd, 3rd the thrill, then 4th and its a let down the high is over.
Good thing you don't have to shift to 4th while in the 1/4 though. Took me numerous passes before I realized that. Made a huge difference.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #94  
Aggro_Al's Avatar
Aggro_Al
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Default

4th and 5th are a let down for some people because they are full lock up gears. They use a mechanical clutch the whole time and skip the hydraulic part of the torque converter. Since 4th is the 1:1 gear and 5th is an overdrive torque reduction gear you no longer get the same acceleration feeling as the first three gears. 4th and 5th are also full lock-up gears, you don't get the torque multiplier from the torque converter which means that slingshot feeling you get from the TC is also gone. But, on the positive side you do get better gas mileage and a more connected feel at the higher speeds. The MTs don't hit the 1:1 gear until 5th.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 06:49 AM
  #95  
gothchick's Avatar
gothchick
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 1
From: ATL
Default

IMHO, AT FTL. 'Nuff said.
Attached Thumbnails AT vs MT-beat_dead_horse-1-.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 07:03 AM
  #96  
Ghost 350z's Avatar
Ghost 350z
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 2
From: Get out my way pimpin', FL
Default

Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
Good thing you don't have to shift to 4th while in the 1/4 though. Took me numerous passes before I realized that. Made a huge difference.

Yea it is a hell of a difference I wish I would have known that sooner. Plus a 3.5FD helps
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 07:04 AM
  #97  
Ghost 350z's Avatar
Ghost 350z
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 2
From: Get out my way pimpin', FL
Default

Originally Posted by gothchick
IMHO, AT FTL. 'Nuff said.

Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 08:11 AM
  #98  
boostingdsm2s2k's Avatar
boostingdsm2s2k
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: North Lauderdale
Default

just a note for A/T owners. no bashing is needed, im just curious. is the + and - options on the shifter an electric switch then couldn't we just hack in buttons by the steering wheel that'll act as paddles? i'm dabating getting a z over my s2k. i want an auto now because its just uncomfortable to be clutching in and out all day. plus i like the 350z auto. it's not bad.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 10:53 AM
  #99  
Nero's Avatar
Nero
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: Riverside/San Ramon, CA
Default

OMFG
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 11:06 AM
  #100  
furiousZ's Avatar
furiousZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: Florida - WPB
Default

Originally Posted by boostingdsm2s2k
just a note for A/T owners. no bashing is needed, im just curious. is the + and - options on the shifter an electric switch then couldn't we just hack in buttons by the steering wheel that'll act as paddles? i'm dabating getting a z over my s2k. i want an auto now because its just uncomfortable to be clutching in and out all day. plus i like the 350z auto. it's not bad.
If you don't want to be clutching all day ... the 350Z's auto is a great transmission. Go test drive one and you'll feel the power even without the MT tranny. Besides, we have a few great quarter mile AT times up there with the MT's in all categories. They're very underestminated-- use it to an advantage and be lazy in traffic at the same time.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:37 AM.